Download | Play 
Download | Play (Thanks to David for the video)
Ah, the quality of political discourse these days. Never mind that we’re involved in an unwinnable quagmire costing the country thousands of lives and billions of dollars. Never mind that we have an administration that is actively obstructing justice and has politicized nearly every department of government. Never mind that we have millions of people in this country living below the poverty level in the “richest country on Earth”. The thing that is REALLY important is that the female Democratic presidential contender has (*gasp*) BREASTS, and she wore a blouse one day that (*double gasp*) revealed ever-so-slightly that she is in possession of said breasts.
Of course, for John Harwood of the Wall Street Journal, Hillary’s blouse was a calculated move…
4 Trackbacks To “MTP: Harwood Likens Hillary’s Cleavage To Barry Bond’s Doping“
May I be the frist to ask, what’s wrong with breasts?
no comment.
Why are these people afraid of breasts? I swear, most men really don’t like women. They may be attracted to them, but they don’t trust them, don’t want to talk to them and generally just don’t like them. They’re schoolyard children afraid of kooties.
I tuned into that show this morning, and couldn’t stand it for more than a few minutes.
Word is out to plant the seed in everybody’s minds that Clinton and Obama are the only two, clear, leading, intelligent choices. Nobody else matters. “It’s probably going to be Clinton” is what everybody is supposed to remember.
The talking heads want Clinton; then it will be a bitter presidential race and is the only way the ‘cons might be able to steal the office again.
I cannot watch mainstream media anymore. It pollutes the minds of all Americans.
calculated?I don’t think so.But this does show the level that some people will stoop to.4 more years of a Clinton would be far better than anything the repug’s could provide.Attacking HC because of some cleavage is ludicris.I suppose they would like to see women dress in nothing but dresses below the knee.The one thing have accomplished is pissing off alot of women..as for the media,I think there are more important issues to be discussed..
Is it me or did the video have nothing to do with breasts? I just saw a string of Hillary and Obama clips but nobody mentioned her cleavage.
[I sent an email-Sitemonitor]
Stupid Git @ 3:
Maybe they’ll cover her up with a tarp next time she is speaking in front of the camera… sort of like what Ashcroft did with the bare breasted statues behind him.
Schadenfreude @ 6:
I’d like to see this alleged cleavage popping video. I’ve heard quite a few comments that it was nothing.
[I sent an email-Sitemonitor]
Schadenfreude @ 6:
Yeah, me too….Saw/heard NOTHING even closely relating to cleavage/breasts, so whey
the C&L commentary above????
[I sent an email-Sitemonitor]
That is correct Mr. Harwood, Hilliary has used The Clear Cream to enlarge her breasts, and it also explains why she has been hitting so many debate questions out of the park.
….
Sure seems to me the clip doesn’t match the headline.
[I sent an email-Sitemonitor]
It would be terrific if America’s culture could grow out of it’s chortling, giggling, sniggering adolescent phase before it does more damage to the planet and humanity.
i wish hillary would keep her boobs out of this…
btw, the vid highlights hillary’s failed attempt to paint herself as the more experienced candidate…
i bet she’ll be wearing a push-up bra next week…
jharp @ 11:
Agreed. Why the commentary in this thread by C&L???
[I sent an email-Sitemonitor]
Titties are good. Don’t be doggin’ the titties. Just because these asswipes can’t get her for a 400.00 haircut, they gotta slag her cones? Give me a break.
She’s showing less cleavage than the average female cast on any CSI episode. THIS makes news? Shoot me now.
Is it any wonder that if the rest of the world is not busy hating our guts they laughing their asses off at us? It’s a good thing I don’t travel outside U.S. borders, I would be too fearful and ashamed.
Wrong clip posted???
[I sent an email-Sitemonitor]
Nicole: Are you monitoring this? Why the C&L “lead in” commentary above when
video clips played on Meet the Press have absolutley NO connection????
[I sent an email-Sitemonitor]
WASHINGTON POST REACHES NEW LOW: REPORTS HILLARY’S BREASTS ‘TACK TO THE RIGHT’
Schadenfreude @ 6:
I think this is wrong clip.
[I sent an email-Sitemonitor]
Blue Buddha @ 7:
Now that you mention Ashcroft,one has to wonder why a far right neocon like him resigned his position..that to me raised a big question.
Oops. I think this is *the* wrong clip.
[I sent an email-Sitemonitor]
relax kids, it’s across the board. next week they are going to discuss the stategic capabilities of rudi mcromney’s saggy ball sack.
but seriously folks. i think lots of men would be happy if american women wore burquas and were beaten for showing a wrist or ankle.
i suspect some people have one foot in some closet, if you know what i mean.
The windows media link does link to a clip of Harwood’s comments.
[I sent an email-Sitemonitor]
Don Davis @ 20:
Certainly hope that those of you who click on this website will note that is
if “FAKE NEWS”….picture was photocroped..
Theo @ 25:
oops, I meant “does not”
[I sent an email-Sitemonitor]
I watched MTP this morning….this is the wrong clip.
[I sent an email-Sitemonitor]
OOOPS!!!!!!!!!!! I confused the video names. Sorry, guys.
I put the right videos up.
[Thanks Nicole. The right video is up now kids-Sitemonitor]
It was the “Ignore The Important News of the Week” on MTP this mornings. 55 minutes of show and Tim “Liberal Bias” Russert dedicated the last five minutes before the adds for GE, BP, Luvox, and other corps. to Gonzales and his mockery of DoJ department. What did he spend the bulk of his show on? Clinton’s and Obama’s pissing match on who’s the better foreign policy maker.
Liberal Media my ass.
Good job Tim on selling us out more.
ok back to discussing titties…….
yeah, uhhhh, this is the wrong clip. All I see is hillary and obama takin swipes at each other.. nothing there about funbags, whatsoever.
[Yeah, uhhhh, It’s been fixed-Sitemonitor]
it’s a shame, I wanted to hear the spineless commentary on hillary’s boobs and why the mere flashing of the top-skin off of one makes every man desperately afraid of doing something dumb in order to touch them. When will male-dominated societies finally learn to control their testosterone instead of blaming the natural power of women for their own weaknesses?
for the love of jeebus……..
oops, disregard the ‘wrong-clip thing, it took me too long to post before she fixed it. thanx, C&L peeps
I think Hillary would do much better if she dressed like a prostitute. The “mainstream press” would leave her appearence alone and she’d certainly win over Republican men, that’s for sure.
Nicole: Appreciate corrected video; BUT still am in the dark as to exactly what
the big hubba ba loo was all about. Is there something(video/clip) out there that
can give me/us a better understanding as to what this titty discussion was all about???
if she dressed like a little boy she would rile up the religous right….and a whole bunch of repug conngressmen
Doggiebobo @ 35:
What I’m trying to communicate is…where are the clips of this revealing blouse Hillary wore?
Doggiebobo @ 35:
I believe HC went on the Senate floor and exposed about a inch of cleavage…
’tis better to have boobs than be a boob…
I saw it …and didn’t even notice it until they made a stink over it….they should get their minds out of the gutter.
Boobies!!! when all else fails you, when you’ve played the 9/11 card so many times nobody cares anymore, when 1/2 your candidates supported pro-choice movements at one time or another, when your party is so embarrassing that you can’t argue experience, qualifications, or even that puppet like quality you seem to like so much in your current leader…what do you do?!? Oh me oh my!!! It’s Boobies to the rescue!!! I’ve always said thank God for boobies (*but then I was always a little adolescent) now the Repug’s can once again join me in a roaring round of Halle-boob-jah Halle-boob-jah, haalllleee-boooob-jah!
Question:
Are we given the choice of having Hillary’s Boobs in the Whitehouse or a Republican Boob (pick one of the candidates) ?
breasts? what are these “breasts” and how come i’ve never seen any?
oh, it’s because i live at home with my parents.
If we think about Hillary’s breasts we won’t have to think about her humorless face or her 180 degree turn from staying in Iraq “if you don’t like it vote for someone else” just 4 months ago to her stunning all-pink-sweetheart-harmless-wardrobe turnaround of “the injustice of it all, bring the troops home”.
Yes, think of Hillary’s breasts, it’s easier.
Bonds and Clinton,Oil and boobs,hmmm…..I’ll take the oilnboobs…anyday
gop agenda always,but now is just as good
deceive
smear
distract
mudshark @ 38:
AN INCH OF BOOBAGE? Coulter wears the same sleezy cocktail dress day in, day out. Vitter’s wife wears some slutty leopard print getup to a press conference, don’t get me started on Fred Thompson’s wife. And gasp, Hillary shows some cleavage and it warrants an op-ed in some right wing news paper. Geez. If that’s the best they could come up with, Hillary is a shoein for ‘08.
Doggiebobo, we don’t have the clip, but here’s the article from WaPo (there’s a picture):
http://www.washingtonpost.com/.....02668.html
Hillary has BREASTS???
OMG - Next you’ll tell me that Bill has a PENIS!
Oh, the humanity!!
(The next sound you hear will be me pounding my head on the keyboard)
Harwood doesn’t like breasts, but prefers a mans, hairy, flat chest anyday.
Ya know, I’ve never heard anybody reply to this stuff with “Man, you’re really an aBLEEP. With all the real problems around to try to solve, you bring up sBLEEP like this? Get the fBLEEP out of here and don’t come back.” Now, that would be a lip reading session to watch over and over.
The question is: What did Hillary’s breasts communicate to John Har(d)wood? Are they as communicative as John Edwards’ hair? And who the hell needs Ruper Murdoch when the WSJ reporter pulls this crap on MTP?
Limp-Dick Blimpaugh @ 50: