Download | Play 
Download | Play
On Tuesday PBS Frontline: “Extraordinary Rendition” explored Bush’s use of the CIA to kidnap persons from sovereign nations and fly them to secret locations at CIA Black Sites or to prisons in other countries to be tortured and held indefinitely in secret without charges. Although the practice of “extraordinary rendition” did not originate under Bush, after Sept 11 “the program expanded beyond recognition—becoming, according to a former C.I.A. official, “an abomination.” What began as a program aimed at a small, discrete set of suspects—people against whom there were outstanding foreign arrest warrants—came to include a wide and ill-defined population that the Administration terms “illegal enemy combatants.”
Ill defined doesn’t really begin to cover it. In the two cases looked at in this clip, both men had actually previously been informants helping in the fight against terrorism prior to 9-11. Abu Omar had once been the “CIA’s most productive source of information” on a group of Islamic fundamentalists living in Albania, and Bisher al-Rawi had been a source for the MI5, helping keep tabs on Muslim extremists in the UK. Evidence in Italy’s case against 26 CIA operatives charged in Abu Omar’s kidnapping shows “that the abduction was a bold attempt to turn him back into the informer he once was,” not for his suspected ties to terrorism, and Al-Rawi believes he too was held “just on the hope he’d offer new intelligence.”
Both men have since been released without ever having been charged with anything, as were most of the hundreds of so-called “enemy combatants” held without due process by the Bush administration that have been released thus far. And if just wanting someone to become a potential informant being enough to get someone kidnapped and tortured wasn’t heinous enough for you, the documentary (which you can watch online) also tells the story of the US’s involvement in the (outsourced?) rendition and detention of the “wife and three children of a senior al-Qaeda suspect” in Somalia. Was Mukasey ever asked his opinion about the legality of any of that?
No Trackbacks To “PBS Frontline: Extraordinary Rendition“
Pinochetification of the government on the march
Freedom first.
Bush Sr, former CIA head must be beaming with pride now that his policies are in full stride.
#1. Hey, if you give us a terrorist, we’ll give you a million dollars.
#2. My wife’s no good husband stole two goats from me. I’m sure he’s a terrorist.
#3. Great! Here’s your million dollars!
Truly, this is filthy.
Not only is the “ordinary” it’s…”EXTRA-ordinary”!
welcome to new el salvador!
Reagan and Bush Sr used to do this kind of covert crap all the time.
Only during those twelve years there was no internet and everyone read the paper and watched the evening news so it was easy to hide it. Piece of Cake! God Bless America!
Now days the Cons don’t even care if people know they are doing it.
The federal government is way way to powerful.
Americans talk about this kind of thing like it is happening somewhere else, to someone else. Consider Jose Padilla, an American citizen. Consider Maher Arar, a Canadian citizen who was what?, …arrested? detained? processed? - how about kidnapped?! Yeah, kidnapped in New York City, from whence he was spirited away to Syria, kept in an underground cell barely bigger than a coffin for nearly a year, and beaten daily.
Don’t think it couldn’t happen to you.
Reich-wingers…..are your proud of yourselves?
frank @ 9:
Corporations are way way to powerful. Pay to play baby. Yes SIR Mr. Corporation. How may I help you today!
Us little people are disposable fodder.
L.A. Confidential @ 12:
Yes, corporations did all of this somehow, not the federal government.
frank @ 13:
They did it together. It’s called ‘Fascism.’
The PBS show was very enlightening and showed proof of how the White House has lied to Americans and the United Nations. Now we will pay for those crimes that Bush/Cheney have done. When these victims bring charges they file with the United Nations, Americans can look forward to paying the bill. Yes Bush/Cheney will be out of office but Daddy Bush will say the US should pay and Dick Cheney will have his money hidden and say he was doing the crime while VP and the money should come from the US not him. Yes we know the truth but much more will come out as countries turn on the US. When Bush/Cheney stop paying the countries to keep their mouths shut then you’ll hear the full story and all the people will file complaints. Oh don’t worry the Republicans will say Bill Clinton did it.
miss_kitty @ 14:
They did it together. It’s called ‘Fascism.’
It’s called a corrupt government with too much power. Corporations wouldn’t be able to do this if the government didn’t have the authority to in the first place.
frank @ 16:
Don’t be obtuse frank, it’s called fascism and it is this way BECAUSE the corporation have taken control of the political machine.
That is why it is called fascism.
I think what we have here is a failure to communicate. What this stunning statement reveals is that doing it a little bit was considered NOT an ‘abomination.’ Wrong, nameless, faceless CIA spook. Any step toward this kind of practice is an ‘abomination,’ and has never been done in the ‘best interests’ of this country-I mean the people, not the fascists in charge. Anyone who did this, was party to this or presided over it should be charged with a crime, arrested and tried in a court of law.
Frightening, isn’t it?! And blows that image of being good guys too, doesn’t it?? American foreign policy is shit and abuse, and has been so for a very long time… as pointed out earlier re: Reagan and Bush Sr. doing so in their rule of the country.
And as already pointed out several times here, the government has too much power. Time to strip them of those overreaching abilities they’ve granted themselves.
“Torture in the name of the free…more misery for you and me…they ship ‘em out so we can’t see…the way they bring ‘em to their knees…”
–Wackiavelli
HILARIOUS!!!
http://www.milkandcookies.com/link/78441/detail/
miss_kitty @ 18:
I think what we have here is a failure to communicate. What this stunning statement reveals is that doing it a little bit was considered NOT an ‘abomination.’ Wrong, nameless, faceless CIA spook. Any step toward this kind of practice is an ‘abomination,’ and has never been done in the ‘best interests’ of this country-I mean the people, not the fascists in charge. Anyone who did this, was party to this or presided over it should be charged with a crime, arrested and tried in a court of law.
You rock, Miss Kitty… and I agree wholeheartedly with your analysis of this. Anyone who participated in this has perpetrated a crime and deserves the full extent of the law to see they’re tried and charged.
LA Confidential@12 said: Us little people are disposable fodder.
I was somewhat amused to find that the anagram of Donald Rumsfeld is ’slumland fodder’…
miss_kitty @ 18:
I think what we have here is a failure to communicate. What this stunning statement reveals is that doing it a little bit was considered NOT an ‘abomination.’ Wrong, nameless, faceless CIA spook. Any step toward this kind of practice is an ‘abomination,’ and has never been done in the ‘best interests’ of this country-I mean the people, not the fascists in charge. Anyone who did this, was party to this or presided over it should be charged with a crime, arrested and tried in a court of law.
No, doing it to persons already wanted by law “people against whom there were outstanding foreign arrest warrants” (like the guys wanted for bombing the embassies in Africa) is one thing. Doing it to people arbitrarily declared enemy combatants (like informants and family members like wives and children) is another thing altogether.
Lynda from Australia @ 23:
LOL perfect
we need to turn bush and cheney over to germany for Extraordinary Rendition. it’s time they pay for ALL their crimes against the USA AND HUMANITY….
L.A. Confidential @ 25:
Glad to see someone besides me are looking beyond the doors of perception for the deeper meaning of things and events.
And this post followed the post describing how Congress will NOT impeach the people responsible for these, and so many other, gross obscenities committed under the guise of “protecting” us.
Disgusting.
roooth @ 28:
Their on the Company “Dole”
Before 9-11, the few renditions ordered under Clinton were against persons already wanted by law for terrorist acts (like involvement in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing case and/or the Embassies in Africa) who had fled to sanctuary countries. there were only a few who were snatched up and taken to be tried. One of them, Talaat Fouad Qassem, one of Egypt’s most wanted terrorists for numerous crimes including the assassination of Sadat, was taken to Egypt and turned over where he had already been given a death sentence in absentia. He disappeared and was believed to have been killed. It’s insinuated but not conclusive that Clinton cooled his heels on the program at least somewhat after that, at least as far as sending renditioned persons to foreign countries like Egypt where they faced charges. There has been no allegations that the US participated in torture as part of the rendition program under Clinton, and no one was picked up and held without charges. That’s what Bush has done, and that is what is heinous about today’s extraordinary rendition program.
Outsourcing Torture
The secret history of America’s “extraordinary rendition” program.
http://www.newyorker.com/archi.....14fa_fact6
It’s a good article.
these are crimes against humanity. Everybody involved, from George W. Bush to the thugs doing the torturing need to be punished as war criminals.
justabill @ 24:
No, doing it to persons already wanted by law “people against whom there were outstanding foreign arrest warrants” (like the guys wanted for bombing the embassies in Africa) is one thing. Doing it to people arbitrarily declared enemy combatants (like informants and family members like wives and children) is another thing altogether.
I respectfully disagree.
“…use of the CIA to kidnap persons from sovereign nations and fly them to secret locations at CIA Black Sites or to prisons in other countries to be tortured and held indefinitely in secret without charges.”
It’s extralegal and we have no business in partaking in barbaric criminal activities.
Legal extradition? Hell yeah. Do the paperwork and send them home to trial, openly.
And foreign arrest warrants don’t=guilty. Even if they did, where on earth is ’secret torture’ part of a prison sentence? I mean openly. (”Sentence is 10 years in prison and some secret torture”)
We don’t get to take guys with arrest warrants, say for serial killing, off the street and just ‘disappear’ them. Then torture them for a confession, or because they piss us off. If that did happen here in the usual court system and was found out, all sorts of legal remedies would start taking place-for the benefit of the alleged criminal-or suspect, if you will.
Usually, a breach of civil and human rights would result in a dismissal of charges, criminal charges against the enforcement agency and officers being laid, and a big fat settlement check for our now free hypothetical alleged serial killer.
We can’t draw a line and say it’s ok for any reason. It’s simply not respectful of every person’s human rights.
It’s the thin end of the wedge, my friend. If we do it to A, then why not B? Torture of anyone, for any reason, is recognised as a felony, internationally.
Lynda from Australia @ 5:
Truly, this is american.
Paul @ 31:
Those that elected him, those who pay the taxes to support and those who sit by and do nothing …….
What happens if an American citizen sends $1 to Ahmadinijad?
In fact under Clinton :
I’ll agree it was still ugly, and its a world we’ll never know with certainty what all went on, and it’s not like Clinton was an angel because he wasn’t, but the idea that someone that was not only a wanted terrorist but who had actually already been convicted and was on the loose being grabbed from a country like Somalia that would not apprehend them isn’t even close to the same thing Bush has been doing. I’d hope that any President would, with the appropriate safeguards against grabbing innocent people, with due process and no torture, would do the same to get the really bad guys off the street wherever they are. If they are that bad, they can get a lawyer and be tried and convicted in court, and if not, we have no business touching them.
miss_kitty @ 32:
Um, Clinton never did that, That was not part of the Extraordinary Rendition program under Clinton. No one was held indefinitely without charges (they were all already found guilty) and none were tortured. There were no CIA black sites. All that happened under Bush.
“In the two cases looked at in this clip, both men had actually previously been informants helping in the fight against terrorism prior
to 9-11.”
Kind of like Saddam Hussein…
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/
What turns my stomach about all this is the confluence of the torture with the utter lack of due process. But it’s all part of the War on Terror ™ smoke and mirrors. Torture is wrong under any circumstance, but even so, in the case of McCain, it was quite apparent when he was captured that he was a member of the US military. It didn’t make his treatment any more justified, but there was no doubt who he was working for, and in what capacity. So for the Neo-Kooks to feel it’s OK to torture someone who is NOT in a uniform, is NOT using military equipment, and at the very same time afford him absolutely NO due process is doubly bad, if that’s even possible regarding torture.
I’ve heard Neo-Kooks talk about the “medieval” mindset of the Islamic extremists. But with their evisceration of the nearly millennia-old bedrock principle of Habeas, and advocating Inquisition style torture techniques, we ought to call them the Neo-Medieval Cons.
here is our song Extraordinary Rendition - it starts with a clip from The Battle of Algiers - Images put to the music by ThinkingBlue - We must stop this un-American inhuman practice. When this story broke in the Boston Globe, my 12 year old daughter said - “Are we torturing people now Daddy?” We decided then that we must speak out and stop this or we are as responsible as those who give the orders and those who carry them out. Here are the lyrics
Extraordinary Rendition
We write a new rendition everyday
By what we do not what we say
What are you doing in our name?
Kidnap and tortures all the same
Extraordinary Rendition
When Freedom’s price is Freedom
We have no rights when we most need them
We are becoming what we fight
We kidnap, torture, kill for right
Extraordinary Rendition
Do you believe their rendition of the truth?
whatcha gonna do when them come for you?
Do you believe their rendition of the truth?
whatcha gonna do when them come for you?
We write a new rendition everyday
By what we do not what we say
We ought to stand for what is right
But our greatest weakness is our might
Extraordinary Rendition
Tim Ed Anshabby @ 39:
Could not agree more.
Devolution at top speed.
justabill @ 37:
Well then, I’m confused by the phrasing in the story. That’s probably my fault though-the old bean hasn’t been super clear on this and that since I had chemo a