We’ve gone way past the thin edge of the wedge. And it’s hard getting a wedge back out of some types of wood. Driving it on through is the easiest way.
But in this metaphor, it’s the worst thing that can happen. And there are damn few helping us pull the wedge out. We’re left praying that a dem regime will back it out.
This whole ’superdelegate’ thing has been sticking in my craw lately, (since I found out about them) but was willing to let it slide till I saw how it played out, then I read this in the times: “…said a Democrat who is both a [candidate’s name] superdelegate and major donor”
WTF?!? I mean these people have the this kind of voting power and they can donate heavily? To me that stinks big time.
Would it be too much to as for the ‘Bastion of Democracy’ to actually have some goddamn democracy?
So who is McCain to complain about torture? He totally caved to the Bush regime and his little bill “outlawing” waterboarding is now being cited retroactively by the Bush regime to claim that it wasn’t illegal when they did it. You see, because Congress specifically banned it, they say it must have been legal before when they were doing it. Geneva Conventions? International treaties? Who cares? Orwellian, no? Or is it Kafkaesque? Whatever.
Good question. Must be, since it’s being questioned hard by the most weak-kneed bunch of mofos ever assembled in Congress since the last Congress met. The telecoms and their lords obviously violate U. S. law. So why isn’t it straight into a federal court?
But maybe not, if they actually succeed in striking it down. I don’t know.
Super capitalist do business in Zurich…
Without the interference of government regulation
4 enterprising capitalist earn 163 million dollars on
only a small investment in hand guns.
The highest form of capitalism.
Shouldn’t they get a medal of freedom or something?
Please, call your Senators tomorrow and raise hell. I’m calling Feinstein…. AGAIN!
Link to Greenwald’s post about tomorrow’s vote at www.GOPnot4me.blogspot.com
These are not statements of fact, merely allegations. There is no assertion that Conyers is guilty of war crimes. This is for discussion purposes only by State Grand Juries, the public, and State Governors for purposes of appointing replacement Members of Congress.
Draft War Crimes Indictment: John Conyers
1. John Conyers [”Conyers”, or “defendant”] was sworn as a Constitutional officer, 5 USC 3331 in Jan 2007. Conyers as Chairman of the Judiciary Committee knew, or should have known, the oath was his binding agreement to fully enforce the Constitution and Geneva Conventions.
2. Conyers in or about 2006 drafted, “Constitution in Crisis,” a well-researched list of exhaustive war crimes, impeachable offenses, and other high crimes of the President and Vice President.
3. Conyers is an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Michigan.
Count 1: Conspiracy
4. In or about December 2006, John Conyers and Nancy Pelosi allegedly conspired to agree to remove impeachment from the legal options of Congress to prosecute, investigate, and challenge the President’s war crimes. Conyers and Pelosi allegedly knew, or should have known, such an agreement would impermissibly leave the Constitution, Supreme Law, and Geneva Conventions unenforced, contrary to their oath of office.
5. The aim of the alleged conspiracy was for Conyers and Pelosi to agree with the President that there would be no impeachment, and a DoJ OLC agreement not to investigate Conyers, Pelosi, and other alleged co-conspirators for their knowledge of, and failure to prevent planned war crimes abuses against prisoners of war. In exchange for the agreement not to prosecute or impeach, Conyers and his alleged co-conspirators were promised by the DOJ Attorney General immunity from prosecution for any and all acts they may have been aware related to war crimes planning, policy making, and implementation. This promise of immunity from prosecution was impermissibly relied upon as an excuse not to fully assert his oath of office.
Count 2: Malfeasance
6. Incorporating all paragraphs above, Conyers allegedly knew or should have know that as a sworn Constitutional officer, he had the legal obligation to keep impeachment on the table, fully investigate facts, and where appropriate issue a final Congressional report related to the alleged war crimes of the President. Conyers refused to do this.
7. Despite Congressman Kucinich’s resolutions calling for an investigation to the Vice President’s alleged war crimes, Conyers and his alleged co-conspirators did not fully investigate the facts outlined in the “Constitution in Crisis,” did not fully enforce Article 82 of the Geneva conventions, a legal duty on him as an attorney to enforce Geneva; and they refused to fully assert their oath of office to defend the Constitution, Supreme Law, and Geneva Conventions.
Count 3: Breach of Fiduciary Duty
8. Incorporating all above paragraphs, as a sworn Constitutional officer, Conyers and his alleged co-conspirators did not fully meet their legal obligations under the US Constitution, despite exhaustive evidence of those standards in “Constitution in Crisis.”
9. Conyers when working on the Watergate Hearings knew, or should have known, the importance of enforcing the Constitution against the President. Despite knowing this legal duty on him, Conyers and his alleged co-conspirators refused to meet their legal obligations.
Count 4: Refusal to Investigate War Crimes
10. Incorporating all above paragraphs, Conyers and his alleged co-conspirators did not meet Article 82 legal obligations under Geneva; nor did they fully investigate the alleged war crimes of the President. His Committee did not issue a final report.
Adjudication
Incorporating the above paragraphs, Conyers and his alleged co-conspirators did not meet the minimum legal standards expected of an attorney, a member of the House of Representatives, a sworn Constitutional officer, nor as Chairman of the Judiciary Committee. His alleged malfeasance in re war crimes has no mitigations. If convicted by a lawful tribunal, the maximum penatly for war cimes is the death penalty.
We’ve gone way past the thin edge of the wedge. And it’s hard getting a wedge back out of some types of wood. Driving it on through is the easiest way.
But in this metaphor, it’s the worst thing that can happen. And there are damn few helping us pull the wedge out. We’re left praying that a dem regime will back it out.
Otherwise, Viva La Resistance.
I would’ve gone with more of a wedgie metaphor (in which case driving it through is not the easiest way), but other than that, yeah, what (s)he said.
We have a FISA resolution that was implemented in 1978 and regularly updated till present. It will expire Friday and the administration wants to include an immunity clause to protect themselves and the telecoms who participated in illegal surveilance since he took office, not just since 9/11. Write your senators now. Don’t wait till tomorrow.
“In any event, this notion that federal courts can’t handle national security matters is insulting to the judges that this body has seen fit to confirm – and it’s contrary to the facts.”
Feingold is THE man. The only one I can consistently see.
Obama, make him VP. Congress is pretty much useless 99.9% of the time. All those new executive thug powers would be sweet if Feingold had a say with part of them.
We have a FISA resolution that was implemented in 1978 and regularly updated till present. It will expire Friday and the administration wants to include an immunity clause to protect themselves and the telecoms who participated in illegal surveilance since he took office, not just since 9/11. Write your senators now. Don’t wait till tomorrow.
This is too important to not do anything about it. Even though I don’t live in the US, I see every country the US has any dealings with doing similar things. Whatever the US does, the rest of the so called free world follows suit. Human rights, civil rights and freedom in general will cease to exist if the US is allowed to continue like this. Orwell’s 1984 will be a walk in the park in comparison.
C&L, you’re trying to change the subject, putting the focus on the Repubs. BUT (as I said in another posting), there’s a lot of dirt on the Dem side to deal with before anyone goes around acting holier than thou. Let’s not forget that o-MOB-a played the race card against the Clintons. Let us not forget the turncoat Dems that are working hard to get to Loserville again come November.
Let us not forget that the media has revved up o-MOB-a-mania, and that way too many Dems are falling for it, just like they did for Kerry in 04.
Let us not let all the Obamorons move on with their travesty without forcing them to look in the mirror and admit they are no better than the Drudges of this world. Because o-MOB-a IS politics as usual, covered up by a media waiting to swat him down.
While Repubs rally around Reagan, you Dems treat your first family like crap.
You call Clinton a racist and then expect my vote if you steal this thing.
C&L, you’re trying to change the subject, putting the focus on the Repubs. BUT (as I said in another posting), there’s a lot of dirt on the Dem side to deal with before anyone goes around acting holier than thou. Let’s not forget that o-MOB-a played the race card against the Clintons. Let us not forget the turncoat Dems that are working hard to get to Loserville again come November.
Let us not forget that the media has revved up o-MOB-a-mania, and that way too many Dems are falling for it, just like they did for Kerry in 04.
Let us not let all the Obamorons move on with their travesty without forcing them to look in the mirror and admit they are no better than the Drudges of this world. Because o-MOB-a IS politics as usual, covered up by a media waiting to swat him down.
While Repubs rally around Reagan, you Dems treat your first family like crap.
You call Clinton a racist and then expect my vote if you steal this thing.
C&L, you’re trying to change the subject, putting the focus on the Repubs. BUT (as I said in another posting), there’s a lot of dirt on the Dem side to deal with before anyone goes around acting holier than thou. Let’s not forget that o-MOB-a played the race card against the Clintons. Let us not forget the turncoat Dems that are working hard to get to Loserville again come November.
Let us not forget that the media has revved up o-MOB-a-mania, and that way too many Dems are falling for it, just like they did for Kerry in 04.
Let us not let all the Obamorons move on with their travesty without forcing them to look in the mirror and admit they are no better than the Drudges of this world. Because o-MOB-a IS politics as usual, covered up by a media waiting to swat him down.
While Repubs rally around Reagan, you Dems treat your first family like crap.
You call Clinton a racist and then expect my vote if you steal this thing.
Again, I say no. I say hell no.
WHY are you such a hater? Geez!
You go along with a trumped-up race card, and I’M the hater. As I said, when this is said and done, you will all feel soul-less. Thank you for abandoning your true leaders in our time of need.
rights and civil liberties are not for flesh and blood American citizens,
are for the corporate entities and business rich friendsof bushco
and cheney.
forbid the hard-working, tax-paying citizens should have any right, except
the one bush gives and that is to be fodder to greed.
C&L, you’re trying to change the subject, putting the focus on the Repubs. BUT (as I said in another posting), there’s a lot of dirt on the Dem side to deal with before anyone goes around acting holier than thou. Let’s not forget that o-MOB-a played the race card against the Clintons. Let us not forget the turncoat Dems that are working hard to get to Loserville again come November.
Let us not forget that the media has revved up o-MOB-a-mania, and that way too many Dems are falling for it, just like they did for Kerry in 04.
Let us not let all the Obamorons move on with their travesty without forcing them to look in the mirror and admit they are no better than the Drudges of this world. Because o-MOB-a IS politics as usual, covered up by a media waiting to swat him down.
While Repubs rally around Reagan, you Dems treat your first family like crap.
You call Clinton a racist and then expect my vote if you steal this thing.
Again, I say no. I say hell no.
WHY are you such a hater? Geez!
You go along with a trumped-up race card, and I’M the hater. As I said, when this is said and done, you will all feel soul-less. Thank you for abandoning your true leaders in our time of need.
Your rants make it hard for any of us to understand what you are for.
C&L, you’re trying to change the subject, putting the focus on the Repubs. BUT (as I said in another posting), there’s a lot of dirt on the Dem side to deal with before anyone goes around acting holier than thou. Let’s not forget that o-MOB-a played the race card against the Clintons. Let us not forget the turncoat Dems that are working hard to get to Loserville again come November.
Let us not forget that the media has revved up o-MOB-a-mania, and that way too many Dems are falling for it, just like they did for Kerry in 04.
Let us not let all the Obamorons move on with their travesty without forcing them to look in the mirror and admit they are no better than the Drudges of this world. Because o-MOB-a IS politics as usual, covered up by a media waiting to swat him down.
While Repubs rally around Reagan, you Dems treat your first family like crap.
You call Clinton a racist and then expect my vote if you steal this thing.
Again, I say no. I say hell no.
Let us put the blame where it belongs, right on the repugs noses. You my friend are falling for the divide and conquer tactic of the Rove machine (MSM).
You go along with a trumped-up race card, and I’M the hater. As I said, when this is said and done, you will all feel soul-less. Thank you for abandoning your true leaders in our time of need.
Your rants make it hard for any of us to understand what you are for.
Clinton. The prosperity and move toward world peace that comes with that leadership. REAL feeling of hope and accomplishment. Of empowerment. Remember?
I’m NOT for kingmakers that guide mob chronies to the head of the line. I am not for candidates that berate a candidate for working for Wal-mart while his wife made money off of that corporation. I am not for someone who plays along with the media as they invent race issues.
I am NOT for a candidate the GOP-owned media delivers on a silver platter, knowing they will cut him to ribbons once they have him all alone.
C&L, you’re trying to change the subject, putting the focus on the Repubs. BUT (as I said in another posting), there’s a lot of dirt on the Dem side to deal with before anyone goes around acting holier than thou. Let’s not forget that o-MOB-a played the race card against the Clintons. Let us not forget the turncoat Dems that are working hard to get to Loserville again come November.
Let us not forget that the media has revved up o-MOB-a-mania, and that way too many Dems are falling for it, just like they did for Kerry in 04.
Let us not let all the Obamorons move on with their travesty without forcing them to look in the mirror and admit they are no better than the Drudges of this world. Because o-MOB-a IS politics as usual, covered up by a media waiting to swat him down.
While Repubs rally around Reagan, you Dems treat your first family like crap.
You call Clinton a racist and then expect my vote if you steal this thing.
Again, I say no. I say hell no.
Let us put the blame where it belongs, right on the repugs noses. You my friend are falling for the divide and conquer tactic of the Rove machine (MSM).
You go along with a trumped-up race card, and I’M the hater. As I said, when this is said and done, you will all feel soul-less. Thank you for abandoning your true leaders in our time of need.
Your rants make it hard for any of us to understand what you are for.
Clinton. The prosperity and move toward world peace that comes with that leadership. REAL feeling of hope and accomplishment. Of empowerment. Remember?
I’m NOT for kingmakers that guide mob chronies to the head of the line. I am not for candidates that berate a candidate for working for Wal-mart while his wife made money off of that corporation. I am not for someone who plays along with the media as they invent race issues.
I am NOT for a candidate the GOP-owned media delivers on a silver platter, knowing they will cut him to ribbons once they have him all alone.
You go along with a trumped-up race card, and I’M the hater. As I said, when this is said and done, you will all feel soul-less. Thank you for abandoning your true leaders in our time of need.
Your rants make it hard for any of us to understand what you are for.
Clinton. The prosperity and move toward world peace that comes with that leadership. REAL feeling of hope and accomplishment. Of empowerment. Remember?
I’m NOT for kingmakers that guide mob chronies to the head of the line. I am not for candidates that berate a candidate for working for Wal-mart while his wife made money off of that corporation. I am not for someone who plays along with the media as they invent race issues.
I am NOT for a candidate the GOP-owned media delivers on a silver platter, knowing they will cut him to ribbons once they have him all alone.
BTW, it is all of you who have fallen for the Rovian Mind Trick and divided the party.
Sorry pal, but I have been against anyone putting down OB or HRC, whoever takes the nom. I will vote for, it’s people like you who are the Rove-ing idiots!
loubie @ 29:
Your rants make it hard for any of us to understand what you are for.
Clinton. The prosperity and move toward world peace that comes with that leadership. REAL feeling of hope and accomplishment. Of empowerment. Remember?
I’m NOT for kingmakers that guide mob chronies to the head of the line. I am not for candidates that berate a candidate for working for Wal-mart while his wife made money off of that corporation. I am not for someone who plays along with the media as they invent race issues.
I am NOT for a candidate the GOP-owned media delivers on a silver platter, knowing they will cut him to ribbons once they have him all alone.
So…you’re for McCain, then? Huckabee?
We shall see. There’s still a long way to go.
But I will not vote for people that called the Clintons racist. And I don’t see whcy Clinton supporters should either.
BTW, it is all of you who have fallen for the Rovian Mind Trick and divided the party.
Sorry pal, but I have been against anyone putting down OB or HRC, whoever takes the nom. I will vote for, it’s people like you who are the Rove-ing idiots!
from Toles at Wapo. Open Thread below…
No Trackbacks To “Open Thread“
Rights are a quaint notion right now, to some.
Just like the idea that we are human beings. Or even Americans.
Toles is one of the best. I have him on my home page, along with Ted Rall and, of course, Trudeau.
We’ve gone way past the thin edge of the wedge. And it’s hard getting a wedge back out of some types of wood. Driving it on through is the easiest way.
But in this metaphor, it’s the worst thing that can happen. And there are damn few helping us pull the wedge out. We’re left praying that a dem regime will back it out.
Otherwise, Viva La Resistance.
Spying Immunity is also sought by … Billo!
Remember very early on in the nightmare when Boosh was asked about the fact that he wouldn’t disclose his email?
He said something like: ‘It’s ‘cos I don’t want people lookin’ at mah stuff.’
Everybody else’s ’stuff’…fair game.
McCain lies about Castro.
Toles is by far my favorite editorial cartoonist in action today. Even just to look at his drawings makes me laugh. He’s always spot on.
hoping for a BIG obama win tomorrow - the bigger the better
a Edwards endorsement to Obama
Obama winning huge in Hawaii and Wi
Obama taking Texas and Ohio
This whole ’superdelegate’ thing has been sticking in my craw lately, (since I found out about them) but was willing to let it slide till I saw how it played out, then I read this in the times: “…said a Democrat who is both a [candidate’s name] superdelegate and major donor”
WTF?!? I mean these people have the this kind of voting power and they can donate heavily? To me that stinks big time.
Would it be too much to as for the ‘Bastion of Democracy’ to actually have some goddamn democracy?
Pardon my ignorance due to not living in the US, but is the immunity a fact now?
Tequila @ 6:
So who is McCain to complain about torture? He totally caved to the Bush regime and his little bill “outlawing” waterboarding is now being cited retroactively by the Bush regime to claim that it wasn’t illegal when they did it. You see, because Congress specifically banned it, they say it must have been legal before when they were doing it. Geneva Conventions? International treaties? Who cares? Orwellian, no? Or is it Kafkaesque? Whatever.
Immunity a fact?
Good question. Must be, since it’s being questioned hard by the most weak-kneed bunch of mofos ever assembled in Congress since the last Congress met. The telecoms and their lords obviously violate U. S. law. So why isn’t it straight into a federal court?
But maybe not, if they actually succeed in striking it down. I don’t know.
Super capitalist do business in Zurich…
Without the interference of government regulation
4 enterprising capitalist earn 163 million dollars on
only a small investment in hand guns.
The highest form of capitalism.
Shouldn’t they get a medal of freedom or something?
Please, call your Senators tomorrow and raise hell. I’m calling Feinstein…. AGAIN!
Link to Greenwald’s post about tomorrow’s vote at www.GOPnot4me.blogspot.com
The only rights that aren’t being violated is the corporations. The supreme court considers them as individuals with rights.
These are not statements of fact, merely allegations. There is no assertion that Conyers is guilty of war crimes. This is for discussion purposes only by State Grand Juries, the public, and State Governors for purposes of appointing replacement Members of Congress.
Draft War Crimes Indictment: John Conyers
1. John Conyers [”Conyers”, or “defendant”] was sworn as a Constitutional officer, 5 USC 3331 in Jan 2007. Conyers as Chairman of the Judiciary Committee knew, or should have known, the oath was his binding agreement to fully enforce the Constitution and Geneva Conventions.
2. Conyers in or about 2006 drafted, “Constitution in Crisis,” a well-researched list of exhaustive war crimes, impeachable offenses, and other high crimes of the President and Vice President.
3. Conyers is an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Michigan.
Count 1: Conspiracy
4. In or about December 2006, John Conyers and Nancy Pelosi allegedly conspired to agree to remove impeachment from the legal options of Congress to prosecute, investigate, and challenge the President’s war crimes. Conyers and Pelosi allegedly knew, or should have known, such an agreement would impermissibly leave the Constitution, Supreme Law, and Geneva Conventions unenforced, contrary to their oath of office.
5. The aim of the alleged conspiracy was for Conyers and Pelosi to agree with the President that there would be no impeachment, and a DoJ OLC agreement not to investigate Conyers, Pelosi, and other alleged co-conspirators for their knowledge of, and failure to prevent planned war crimes abuses against prisoners of war. In exchange for the agreement not to prosecute or impeach, Conyers and his alleged co-conspirators were promised by the DOJ Attorney General immunity from prosecution for any and all acts they may have been aware related to war crimes planning, policy making, and implementation. This promise of immunity from prosecution was impermissibly relied upon as an excuse not to fully assert his oath of office.
Count 2: Malfeasance
6. Incorporating all paragraphs above, Conyers allegedly knew or should have know that as a sworn Constitutional officer, he had the legal obligation to keep impeachment on the table, fully investigate facts, and where appropriate issue a final Congressional report related to the alleged war crimes of the President. Conyers refused to do this.
7. Despite Congressman Kucinich’s resolutions calling for an investigation to the Vice President’s alleged war crimes, Conyers and his alleged co-conspirators did not fully investigate the facts outlined in the “Constitution in Crisis,” did not fully enforce Article 82 of the Geneva conventions, a legal duty on him as an attorney to enforce Geneva; and they refused to fully assert their oath of office to defend the Constitution, Supreme Law, and Geneva Conventions.
Count 3: Breach of Fiduciary Duty
8. Incorporating all above paragraphs, as a sworn Constitutional officer, Conyers and his alleged co-conspirators did not fully meet their legal obligations under the US Constitution, despite exhaustive evidence of those standards in “Constitution in Crisis.”
9. Conyers when working on the Watergate Hearings knew, or should have known, the importance of enforcing the Constitution against the President. Despite knowing this legal duty on him, Conyers and his alleged co-conspirators refused to meet their legal obligations.
Count 4: Refusal to Investigate War Crimes
10. Incorporating all above paragraphs, Conyers and his alleged co-conspirators did not meet Article 82 legal obligations under Geneva; nor did they fully investigate the alleged war crimes of the President. His Committee did not issue a final report.
Adjudication
Incorporating the above paragraphs, Conyers and his alleged co-conspirators did not meet the minimum legal standards expected of an attorney, a member of the House of Representatives, a sworn Constitutional officer, nor as Chairman of the Judiciary Committee. His alleged malfeasance in re war crimes has no mitigations. If convicted by a lawful tribunal, the maximum penatly for war cimes is the death penalty.
Bit NOLA @ 3:
I would’ve gone with more of a wedgie metaphor (in which case driving it through is not the easiest way), but other than that, yeah, what (s)he said.
Another Toles goodie
http://www.uclick.com/client/nyt/tt/
We have a FISA resolution that was implemented in 1978 and regularly updated till present. It will expire Friday and the administration wants to include an immunity clause to protect themselves and the telecoms who participated in illegal surveilance since he took office, not just since 9/11. Write your senators now. Don’t wait till tomorrow.
Toles is right on, as usual.
Senator Feingold 2/11/08
“In any event, this notion that federal courts can’t handle national security matters is insulting to the judges that this body has seen fit to confirm – and it’s contrary to the facts.”
Feingold is THE man. The only one I can consistently see.
Obama, make him VP. Congress is pretty much useless 99.9% of the time. All those new executive thug powers would be sweet if Feingold had a say with part of them.
Ron @ 19:
This is too important to not do anything about it. Even though I don’t live in the US, I see every country the US has any dealings with doing similar things. Whatever the US does, the rest of the so called free world follows suit. Human rights, civil rights and freedom in general will cease to exist if the US is allowed to continue like this. Orwell’s 1984 will be a walk in the park in comparison.
“Good intentions do pave the road to hell.
C&L, you’re trying to change the subject, putting the focus on the Repubs. BUT (as I said in another posting), there’s a lot of dirt on the Dem side to deal with before anyone goes around acting holier than thou. Let’s not forget that o-MOB-a played the race card against the Clintons. Let us not forget the turncoat Dems that are working hard to get to Loserville again come November.
Let us not forget that the media has revved up o-MOB-a-mania, and that way too many Dems are falling for it, just like they did for Kerry in 04.
Let us not let all the Obamorons move on with their travesty without forcing them to look in the mirror and admit they are no better than the Drudges of this world. Because o-MOB-a IS politics as usual, covered up by a media waiting to swat him down.
While Repubs rally around Reagan, you Dems treat your first family like crap.
You call Clinton a racist and then expect my vote if you steal this thing.
Again, I say no. I say hell no.
lou: No one liked Kerry the way they liked Obama. And how is defending MLK playing the race card?
Anyway, the Brits hate
the Tibetans.
loubie @ 24:
WHY are you such a hater? Geez!
No one attacked MLK.
Go back to Chris Mathews.
Get set for the McCain Years.
lou: McCain can’t even win against Bush.
Ron @ 26:
You go along with a trumped-up race card, and I’M the hater. As I said, when this is said and done, you will all feel soul-less. Thank you for abandoning your true leaders in our time of need.
rights and civil liberties are not for flesh and blood American citizens,
are for the corporate entities and business rich
friendsof bushcoand cheney.
forbid the hard-working, tax-paying citizens should have any right, except
the one bush gives and that is to be fodder to greed.
24 loubie–Bush wants his Chaney back!
loubie @ 29:
Your rants make it hard for any of us to understand what you are for.
Tequila @ 28:
It will be fun finding out about o-MOB-a and his fun times in Chi-Town come September.
I know I won’t vote for him. Hypocrisy and cronysim do not equate to Hope and Change.
They do equate to Audacity, when you pull the act he’s pulling off.
lougie @ 24:
Let us put the blame where it belongs, right on the repugs noses. You my friend are falling for the divide and conquer tactic of the Rove machine (MSM).
loubie @ 33:
So, you’re for Clinton then?
Ron @ 32:
Clinton. The prosperity and move toward world peace that comes with that leadership. REAL feeling of hope and accomplishment. Of empowerment. Remember?
I’m NOT for kingmakers that guide mob chronies to the head of the line. I am not for candidates that berate a candidate for working for Wal-mart while his wife made money off of that corporation. I am not for someone who plays along with the media as they invent race issues.
I am NOT for a candidate the GOP-owned media delivers on a silver platter, knowing they will cut him to ribbons once they have him all alone.
lafin gas @ 34:
I got that. LOL!
BTW, it is all of you who have fallen for the Rovian Mind Trick and divided the party.
loubie @ 36:
So you hate blacks. Why didn’t you just say so.
loubie @ 36:
So…you’re for McCain, then? Huckabee?
loubie @ 38:
Sorry pal, but I have been against anyone putting down OB or HRC, whoever takes the nom. I will vote for, it’s people like you who are the Rove-ing idiots!
Proud2bHumble @ 40:
We shall see. There’s still a long way to go.
But I will not vote for people that called the Clintons racist. And I don’t see whcy Clinton supporters should either.
If you lose because of it, you deserve it.
lafin gas @ 41:
Geeeeee, ya think?
loubie @ 38:
and you have been drinking too much cheap wine.