Crooks and Liars in your InBox

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Search

Categories

Syndication

John Amato’s virtual online magazine…OK, It’s a blog!




Chris Dodd on FISA: Gives a shout out to Glenn Greenwald

Sen. Chris Dodd spoke out against immunity for the telecoms on the Senate floor Monday night as they prepare to vote on the new FISA bill today and quoted our pal, Glenn Greenwald. (rough transcript)

Dodd: And the idea that this body would grant retroactive immunity in the face of these challenges and deny the courts an opportunity to determine at the mere request of a president….the major companies for years on end can sweep up—vacuum up to use the Church committees language, every telephone conversation, every fax , every email of millions and millions of Americans is a precedent I don’t think we would want to have left as part of our heritage in coming generations. And believe me they will look back to us…Constitutional lawyer and author Glenn Greenwald expressed the high stakes this way, Mr. President and I quote:

‘The Bush administration will be gone in eleven months, but in the absence of some meaning accountability all of this will remain. If these theories remain undisturbed and unchallenged. And all of these crimes go un-investigated and unpunished, that will have a profound impact on changing our national character and further transforming the type of country we are.’




No Trackbacks To “Chris Dodd on FISA: Gives a shout out to Glenn Greenwald“

173 Responses for “Chris Dodd on FISA: Gives a shout out to Glenn Greenwald”
1
smoke Says:

Cool

2
xoites defends Constitution Says:

“…further transforming the type of country we are.”

Maybe it will just further change the perception of the type of country we are. Many used to believe this country stood for justice and democracy even though then (as now) that was a big lie.

3
peaceful easy feeling Says:

Considering Dodd’s relevance in the presidential primaries, it’s not surprising at all to see him turning to the blogosphere for his material.

4
getalife Says:

Watched Dodd speak on FISA amnesty for 2 and half hrs last night. Our Senate is using unity and will vote today to allow w to break the law again and give everyone involved amnesty.

So far, he has admitted torture, spying on Americans without a warrant and punked on WMD’s in Iraq.

The Dems have decided to not hold them accountable to win elections instead. Hope for the Dems to do the right thing, will be ended today.

If this is not broken government, what is?

5
Mmcd Says:

Can ONE Senator make aa difference?

6
Dire Lobo Says:

Way to go Glenn!

7
mudshark Says:

Senator Dodd: Just Do It.

8
MargeAggedon Says:

Say it with me folks… “Fascist Dictatorship”.
Ruling by ‘whatever the hell the presidunce feels like’ is NOT acceptable. Bring back the rule of law and arrest the war criminals NOW.

9
JerryO Says:

Yup, yup…two words…DANGEROUS PRECEDENT. If the Bush Administration is left unchallenged and unaccountable for their eight year nightmare, how much farther will the next Administration go? We have already lost our right to privacy, the protections of Habeas Corpus, corporations are operating practically tax-free and are allowed to have major role in dictating Federal Law and Policy.

10
zonk Says:

This man is the ONLY congress-critter who is really working hard to preserve our constitution and save our country from corporatism.

And if you remember your history, corporatism IS fascism, according to Il Duce himself.

11
Norman Says:

I think that since Dodd was able to get out of the bubble while campaigning for President he was able to actually talk to real people. Only a few know that this government is broken and that this administration has sent this country back years, both morally and physically. The GOP IS BANKRUPT and they don’t care who they take with them as long as it isn’t a BUSH. Loyalty of party over country has ruined the GOP. We can’t count on Reid he is empty and Nancy is one of them.
Thank you Senator Dodd for keeping your word one of the few people whom you can still trust what they say.

12
Otay Says:

I want to see the senate ditch Harry Reid and put Dodd in his place.

13
MargeAggedon Says:

Otay @ 12:

I want to see the senate ditch Harry Reid and put Dodd in his place.

They’d never do it. I get the feeling real leadership scares the hell out of them. They’re afraid the bullies might threaten to send them a nasty note again.

14
Dr. Acula Says:

Dangerous precedent set by a dangerous president.

15
xpj1000 Says:

You have to admire Chris Dodd. He’s got the courage to not only talk about preserving our democracy and Constitution but to actually attempt to do it.

I really like the things Barrack Obama has to say and I want desperately to believe that change for the better will happen. At the same time, though, I don’t believe he can or will effect that change. Does anybody know if Obama and Clinton are there to support Dodd or are they on the campaign trail? If they’re not, what change do they really represent?

16
nwmuse Says:

I love Chris Dodd. I’m sorry he dropped out of the race. He does a good job in the Senate though and is better able to serve there.
Our government is broken, plain and simple. That will be proved out today. It is hard to stay hopeful of real, positive change. Nothing will ever be uncovered and nobody will ever be held to account. Sad and devastating for our country.

17
CalGeorge Says:

This immunity deal strikes at the very heart of our democracy.

It eviscerates the Rule of Law.

It undermines the checks and balances that are the very lifeblood of our government.

It sends the unambiguous message:

Congress will serve corporations, not the people.

Shame on you, Congress. For shame!

Congress today is plunging a knife into the very heart of Democracy.

Yes, sir, Mr. President, whatever you say, sir. Protection for you and your lawbreaking allies is more important than the oath I took to defend the Constitution.

18
xpj1000 Says:

I just did a cursory look through both Clinton and Obama’s websites. Niether appears to mention FISA or Americans’ Constitutional rights. Maybe I need to take more time with each site to find their stand on this topic.

19
L.A. Confidential Says:

Right the freaking Dems will save us. Just like they ended this war when the voters put them back in the game in Congress.

Right, sure, uh huh.

20
Otay Says:

xpj1000 @ 15:

You have to admire Chris Dodd. He’s got the courage to not only talk about preserving our democracy and Constitution but to actually attempt to do it.

I really like the things Barrack Obama has to say and I want desperately to believe that change for the better will happen. At the same time, though, I don’t believe he can or will effect that change. Does anybody know if Obama and Clinton are there
to support Dodd or are they on the campaign trail? If they’re not, what change do they really represent?

Unlike Edwards, Hillary and Obama can’t even be bothered to speak out forcefully against telecom immunity. It’s too frightening to take on leadership skills, I imagine.

21
craig Says:

Have no doubt… the next Democratic president that has a GOP-controlled congress WILL BE IMPEACHED. They will do it, they are already planning to do it. It doesn’t matter what it will be about - maybe the price of a haircut.

22
Ron Says:

If it was a republican leadership, they would find a way to get their way, even if they had to bribe everyone. I have to wonder how many of the Dems were wiretapped and are being blackmailed.

23
L.A. Confidential Says:

Ron @ 22:

If it was a republican leadership, they would find a way to get their way, even if they had to bribe everyone. I have to wonder how many of the Dems were wiretapped and are being blackmailed.

Probably all of them. And none of them want to have their cozy jobs-free rides yanked out from underneath them.

24
ticktock Says:

Hi folks….

They’re voting for the Feinstein amendment right now…Cspan2…let’s see how it goes…

25
Terrible Says:

“further transforming the type of country we are.” is putting it pretty damn mildly! If they pass this we won’t have phones anymore and there will be all those nasty former telecom CEOs on the street corners begging. The ones that survive that is.

26
Chico Says:

The anti-war sentiment seems to be pretty strong from my perspective in both the street and right here on C&L. It’s also pretty clear, that most if not all the ills this country currently faces, stem directly from the Iraq War.

So why did the 4 strongest antiwar candidates (Dodd, Kucinich, Gravel and Ron Paul) suffer thru such anemic support in the primaries ?

I suppose the answer lies in the very same criticism we place on Congress for talking a good game, but not showing up where the rubber meets the road.

27
JTM Says:

xpj1000 @ 15:

Does anybody know if Obama and Clinton are there to support Dodd or are they on the campaign trail?

They won’t be there.

xpj1000 @ 15:

If they’re not, what change do they really represent?

I leave that to you.

28
L.A. Confidential Says:

ticktock @ 24:

Hi folks….

They’re voting for the Feinstein amendment right now…Cspan2…let’s see how it goes…

Bush usually just signs a statement on any legislation that passes that doesn’t benefit the agenda.

“Null and Void due to National Security” . . . . GWB

29
L.A. Confidential Says:

L.A. Confidential @ 28:

ticktock @ 24:

Hi folks….

They’re voting for the Feinstein amendment right now…Cspan2…let’s see how it goes…

Bush usually just signs a statement on any legislation that passes that doesn’t benefit the agenda.

“Null and Void due to National Security” . . . . GWB

And the Dems know it. Their just raking in our money and accomplishing NOTHING.

30
Chico Says:

L.A. Confidential @ 23:

Ron @ 22:

If it was a republican leadership, they would find a way to get their way, even if they had to bribe everyone. I have to wonder how many of the Dems were wiretapped and are being blackmailed.

Probably all of them. And none of them want to have their cozy jobs-free rides yanked out from underneath them.

This is how EVERYONE in Washington is manipulated. They threaten them with their livelihood and all their worldly possessions. It’s also why the entire establishment hated Ross Perot, it would have been impossible to make him conform by threatening to take away his goodies, he already had plenty of toys and the resources to buy a hundred times as many.

31
ticktock Says:

L.A. Confidential @ 28:

ticktock @ 24:

Hi folks….

They’re voting for the Feinstein amendment right now…Cspan2…let’s see how it goes…

Bush usually just signs a statement on any legislation that passes that doesn’t benefit the agenda.

“Null and Void due to National Security” . . . . GWB

Was just hoping the Senate wasn’t going to assist with his agenda…all we can hope for right now is that there is not enough votes for cloture…knew that this amendment wasn’t going to pass…

32
L.A. Confidential Says:

Chico @ 30:

L.A. Confidential @ 23:

Ron @ 22:

If it was a republican leadership, they would find a way to get their way, even if they had to bribe everyone. I have to wonder how many of the Dems were wiretapped and are being blackmailed.

Probably all of them. And none of them want to have their cozy jobs-free rides yanked out from underneath them.

This is how EVERYONE in Washington is manipulated. They threaten them with their livelihood and all their worldly possessions. It’s also why the entire establishment hated Ross Perot, it would have been impossible to make him conform by threatening to take away his goodies, he already had plenty of toys and the resources to buy a hundred times as many.

Yes Indeed. They hold the wealth, we hold the debt.

They don’t want to join the ranks of us lowly debt holders either.

33
JTM Says:

It would be very surprising if cloture doesn’t sail through, given that the debate is already under the control of a UC agreement.

Your hope (and letters & phone-calls) should be aimed at the House.

34
Shadowgm Says:

It’s a sad commentary on our country when we judge our leaders by the most incompetent, as opposed to the best and brightest.

“Not as bad as Bush.”

And judge the standards for impeachment in a similar way - multiple instances of lying to Congress, breaking the law … but no action. Of course, when a Democratic president steps wrong, the Republicans will be there in force.

(Egads. The CBS Early Show just ran a tease for a story about super siblings, and whether it’s a case of nature or nurture … and showed Peyton & Eli Manning, Venus & Serena Williams, and Jeb & George Bush.)

35
Shadowgm Says:

Chico @ 26:

I suppose the answer lies in the very same criticism we place on Congress for talking a good game, but not showing up where the rubber meets the road.

If I had a nickel for every bedbug letter I got from Feinstein and Pelosi …

36
Rasputin Says:

Yes call your Senators… but remember this day and when it comes time to donate to his senate race… Contribute!

Screw giving to the DCCC… give to candidates who vote responsibly like Senator Dodd, a true American hero!

37
Ron Says:

Shadowgm @ 34:

It’s a sad commentary on our country when we judge our leaders by the most incompetent, as opposed to the best and brightest.

“Not as bad as Bush.”

And judge the standards for impeachment in a similar way - multiple instances of lying to Congress, breaking the law … but no action. Of course, when a Democratic president steps wrong, the Republicans will be there in force.

(Egads. The CBS Early Show just ran a tease for a story about super siblings, and whether it’s a case of nature or nurture … and showed Peyton & Eli Manning, Venus & Serena Williams, and Jeb & George Bush.)

Jeb and Geo. Bush, super siblings? GIVE ME A F**KING BREAK.

38
L.A. Confidential Says:

Rasputin @ 36:

Yes call your Senators… but remember this day and when it comes time to donate to his senate race… Contribute!

Screw giving to the DCCC… give to candidates who vote responsibly like Senator Dodd, a true American hero!

Frankly I’m tired of donating money and getting shafted in the end.

39
rain Says:

I am wondering when GW will grant a complete pardon to the communications companies of this country. After charges are filed? After a conviction?

Ford granted Nixon a complete and unconditional pardon to Nixon the minute he got in the oval office - after stating to the confirmation committe “the public wouldn’t stand for it.” Well, the public didn’t. He served out his term and even though he was a sitting president - ran for re-election - he did not win.

I don’t think the public will stand for immunity from prosecution with the communications company.

Remember when we were kids and we made a telephone out of string and tin cans? We can do it again.

40
Bud Says:

OT, but boosh and FOX are at it again

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,330415,00.html

FEAR! FEAR! FEAR! FEAR!

41
theWalrus Says:

With today’s FISA vote, the Rule Of Lawlessness reigns, thanks to our Senate Dems. Don’t worry everybody. When a Dem is elected Prez later this year the “Rule Of Law” will come back with a vengeance. If he/she so much as sneezes the Repubs will begin impeachment hearings. The sad part is, many Senate/House Dems would probably support it, you know, so as to appear fair and bipartisan. It’s called “self-destruction”.

42
empy Says:

Otay @ 20:

xpj1000 @ 15:

You have to admire Chris Dodd. He’s got the courage to not only talk about preserving our democracy and Constitution but to actually attempt to do it.

I really like the things Barrack Obama has to say and I want desperately to believe that change for the better will happen. At the same time, though, I don’t believe he can or will effect that change. Does anybody know if Obama and Clinton are there
to support Dodd or are they on the campaign trail? If they’re not, what change do they really represent?

Unlike Edwards, Hillary and Obama can’t even be bothered to speak out forcefully against telecom immunity. It’s too frightening to take on leadership skills, I imagine.

Not true, Edwards did speak out against Telcom Immunity. Nobody is our corporate media was listening though (or you either obviously). He asked both sitting Senators campaigning against him to do the right thing and stand with Dodd.

43
L.A. Confidential Says:

Pelosi seemed especially broken up about having to surrender on Iraq, sounding like an NFL coach in a postgame presser, trying with a straight face to explain why he punted on first-and-goal. “We just didn’t have any plays we liked down there,” said the coach of the 0-15 Dems. “Sometimes you just have to play the field-position game….” ©Copyright 2008 Rolling Stone

44
ticktock Says:

the feingold/webb amendment is up on vote right now…cspan2…this is it kids….

Are Clinton and Obama there to vote today? If not, why not? If this fails by only two votes, we have some calling and writing to do..

46
Shadowgm Says:

pissed off patricia @ 45:

Are Clinton and Obama there to vote today? If not, why not? If this fails by only two votes, we have some calling and writing to do..

With the Potomac Primary today, doubtful.

47
JTM Says:

rain @ 39:

I am wondering when GW will grant a complete pardon to the communications companies of this country. After charges are filed? After a conviction?

You don’t seem to get this.

The telecoms are being sued, not prosecuted. A pardon is irrelevant. A pardon would not stop the suits, so it would not prevent disclosure of the acts. Only immunity would do this.

48
L.A. Confidential Says:

pissed off patricia @ 45:

Are Clinton and Obama there to vote today? If not, why not? If this fails by only two votes, we have some calling and writing to do..

Why bother when Bush will just null and void it.

The next one is the Dodd amendment, that’s the big one.

I understand Hillary will not be in any of the states voting today, so she could be there, but I see neither she nor Obama are there.

50
JTM Says:

Shadowgm @ 46:

pissed off patricia @ 45:

Are Clinton and Obama there to vote today? If not, why not? If this fails by only two votes, we have some calling and writing to do..

With the Potomac Primary today, doubtful.

Also, not really relevant, since one is in Texas and the other is in Wisconsin.