Barack Hussein Obama (b. August 4, 1961) is the junior Senator from Illinois, elected to the United States Senate as a Democrat in 2004. Obama is currently the only African AmericanUnited States Senate, where he serves his first term. Obama has been accused of falsely calling himself a constitutional law professor, though there are documents to back up his statement. [1][2][3] serving in the
Barack Obama is often praised for his speeches, except when he is not able to read them from a teleprompter. “Shorn of his Teleprompter, we saw a different Obama. His delivery was halting and unsure. … The prepared text for his remarks, as released on his website, sounded a lot like a typical Obama speech. … [But with] no Teleprompter signaling the prepared text, Obama failed to deliver the speech in his characteristically flawless fashion.”[13]
On Hillary Clinton — this was one of the kinder, gentler passages:
During the 1970s and ’80s, the Clintons invested in the Whitewater Development Corporationprosecutions and convictions. Jim and Susan McDougal, and then-Arkansas Governor Jim Guy Tucker were convicted of multiple counts of financial fraud, even though President Clinton testified for four hours for the defense.[46] which later became the subject of a federal investigation. Read on…
Conservatives suck at satire and are rarely funny on purpose, but I think Conservapedia struck comedy gold. Using sources such as Charles Krauthammer, Brent Bozell and World Net Daily, they couldn’t help but create a belly-laugher of a website and plenty of red meat for the frothing fringe that now dominates the Republican base. It’s going to be a long year…
Filed Under: Barack Obama, Campaigns/Elections, Election 08, Republican Party, Right Wing Stupidity, Smears
No Trackbacks To “Conservapedia Attacks! The Democratic Candidates“
I wonder what they say about McSenile?
WOW! This is sad! It will work on myopic idiots who believe FOX and Limbaugh. SAD!!!!
Conservapedia: the definitive web resource for getting it dead wrong.
Who cares? This trash is coming from a website where homosexuality-related entries (pun intended) are, by far, the leading topics read. Conservapedia is a ridiculous concept.
Jim Guckert @ 1:
Prediction:
“He’s just so McSaintly! We have a real mcCrush on him.”
Bonkers Hussein @ 5:
That’s McSick.
Conservapedia sounds like a foot fungus that afflicts modern day Republicans. It develops after long periods of opening mouth and inserting foot. Some believe that it is caused by an aversion to facts or the truth, but studies have found that it began when Larry Craig lived out one of his fetishes.
ok hackers! get to it!
But because everything found on Conservapedia is a lie, this is a good thing, right?
flamethrower @ 7:
LMAO
Conservapedia on Obama: He has no clear personal achievement that cannot be explained as the likely result of affirmative action.
Its the shared cum rag between conservative butt buddies. No one else even knows or cares about that nonsense.
Conservapedia and Faux links go to /dev/null.
Can conservatives consider themselves the real “Americans for Balanced Energy Choices,” come to think of it?
Conservapedia = more Koolaide for the weak.
Logan I think you hit it right on the head although I’m using a bit of editorial license…”Conservatives SUCK…!”
Conservapedia has quite the editing practices. If you click on “view source” it lists the sources for the article. You find one, copy and paste it, and go to the site, and surprise, surprise! The article you go to is not what is on Conservapedia.
I can understand wanting to compete with Wikipedia, but to post complete fabrications when the actual articles are right there in broad daylight doesn’t just smack of partisan hacking, but of severe immaturity. Who owns that site, 3 year olds?
Well, you must consider that this is a site that once said the existence of dinosaurs is “controversial.”
Barrack enjoying Pizza
http://tinyurl.com/2dhp2k
Between this and the McCain Weather Girls video, it seems conservatives are seeking to poison our culture with crushing lameness.
Another Hillary glamor shot.
http://tinyurl.com/yvy7jk
http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Statistics
Most viewed pages:
Main Page [2,427,659]
Homosexuality [2,367,731]
Teen Homosexuality [415,687]
Wikipedia [341,658]
Arguments Against Homosexuality [331,266]
Homosexual Agenda [329,016]
Ex-homosexuals [316,236]
Homosexuality and Choice [311,170]
Homosexuality and Anal Cancer [298,583]
Homosexuality and Health [292,107]
This is what happens when you can’t get your head out of your ass. Or if you put too much faith in your priest.
I just cannot imagine what it would be like to be a conservative. Are they ALL retarded?
Acting Patriotic @ 20:
I don’t know if that is true but it certainly would not surprise me.
Acting Patriotic @ 20:
Conservatives… latently obsessed with homosexuality?? You don’t say!! My monocle just popped!
Over at Agitprop, there are days when I lack the inspiration to post … then I head over to Conservapedia and ask for a random page. Instant blog post.
i wouldn’t worry too much, readers of the ‘trustworthy’ encyclopedia have their minds elsewhere:
http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Statistics
and yes, that’s real. how … curious.
Conservapedia on the Bush Fiasco called the Iraq War:
We created a battle, a confrontation, a flash point, with Islamic terrorism in Iraq. This has focused the battle. The ones killed there won’t have to be killed here, or somewhere else. We have a good shot at creating a democratic, peaceful Iraq…
Friends, the ‘battle’ is ‘focused’…. and…it as it is going on the sixth year conservapedia says ‘the ones killed there won’t have to be killed here’ (sort of like saying that wisdom tooth you had pulled there won’t have to be pulled again here), and ‘we do have a good shot’ at democracy!
Captain Hussein Kangaroo @ 21:
Conservatism means ideals are unattainable.
Ideals are therefore discarded.
The mediocre is embraced.
It shows up in the population as Bush Bots.
Mediocrity and hypocrisy.
Why strive for excellence when most people are Bush Bots?
This is where “abob” comes in and says “it’s true!”
shwa @ 25:
Now that I think about it, alot of those could have been outraged liberal readers or just people wondering what the fuck these morons are thinking… though I don’t doubt the latent obsession in the first place!
Just the idea that there should be an ‘encyclopaedia’ to express a specific point of view is pretty telling. Obviously, the many authors must have missed the Enlightenment altogether………. and the premise of the Encyclopédie.
Ill-educated dunderheads one and all.
im gonna hack the bush wikipedia and write fucktard one thousand times
now thats funny
Somebody dugg that page 20 days ago….
http://digg.com/political_opin.....e_obsessed
Never mind Conservapedia.I can’t believe the daily thrashing the Dems are taking on CNN.
It doesn’t matter one whit what the issues are-the Democrats always come out looking bad.
I’ve learned in the last couple of days how sneaky,incompetent,weak,philandering,insincere,unpatriotic and racist Democrats are.Oh and something about McCain making a “gaffe” about Iran sending Al Qaeda terrorists into Iraq which apparently was hardly even worth mentioning because McCain is so experienced and looks so cool in aviator sun glasses and is such a “Maverick”.
and where are
And don’t forget - Conservapedia is brought to you by the idiot son of Phyllis Schlafly: http://cynicsparty.com/2008/02.....f-the-day/
billo should have a place in the conservapedia
as a wet fart–flaming
well, the conservapedia folks would probably love this tidbit…
[Maybe. But it’s off topic here. Post it in an open thread-Sitemonitor]
Conservatism is suffering a very painful, ugly demise. Once a handsome, well-groomed , polite but tough defender of hard working values, it has slowly aged into a bitter,drooling, greedy, lecherous and violent shell of it’s former self. It will be dead soon, killed by the cancers of avarice and hubris. It’s final throes are not quiet and noble but rather flatulent and scatological . There are concerns that conservatism’s young son, Neo, may have to be commited to an asylum before he does any more damage to inside and outside body and property.
Conservatives aren’t funny and this is? It might be funny if you’re fourteen. “McSenile” is just hilarious. Nanee nanee boo-boo is funny too.
We all know that the conservatives are mindless follow the leader sheep. It is nice to see another example and all but they bore me pretty fast. I mean getting on Obama because these jerks think he can only read a teleprompter or because Hill and that old family favorite Whitewater nonsense. Really! If somebody is not going to vote for Hill because of Whitewater I’m not going to worry. That person will get lost on the way to the polling place anyway. I’m going back over to the Barney Frank topic. I think they are having some sort of party over there. Something I can get into.
The closet republican in Hillary Clinton comes out!
Clinton: Protect reputable home lenders
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/200....._housing_8
iraqhusseinconcilable @ 38:
I wonder if that was the thinking in 1864?
Conservatives attacking Democrats???
Wow, now that’s news.
with the stinging wit of simians pitching feces, it’s another o’really moment… the rush man… the ann coulter man… trying to scrape their wits off their shoes
Of corse Senator Obama told the truth, not to be funny or a smart ass or anything like that, however most black people that compete for postions of higher authority are well aware of the eye’s, ears and questons that will be hurled at them (myself included), which is why many of us already have our ducks lined up, which is why it is that Senator Obama submitted all of his credentuals as well as his financial records, including tax statements and background information that show that he does not have to lie about anything.
We know this up front from experience of going through the process, that it is important to lay it out there.
In fact you can say whatever you will, but not one of the rest of the candidates on both parties have or did produce supporting documentation as he has and the reason is because and again say whatever you want, but there are some people in this country who do not believe that it is necessary for them to be questioned and that we should take them at face value.
This is how we ended up with Bush and a whole lot of these people currently running all over our government and a good reason to understand why we are now in a deep recession.
I call a spade a spade. It is what it is.
Ah Conservapedia! The guys who brought us Jesus riding a dinosaur!
I love those guys!
Conservapedia is a crack-up. Check any thread there and if it’s comprehensible it’s usually accusepedia, or worhipapedia. The Intelligent Design threads are the best–definite proof that there is neither involved in conservapedia. The funniest thing is the writing, it’s like trollsville with no one to guide them. Bad English, no fact, all funny.
ConcernedCanuck @ 15:
Well than this should make it easy to give our own bent to conservapedia. Sign up, hack away. Kind of like virtual graffiti! Go go dirty… defile the site liberals!
Leslie @ 11:
If you think that’s funny, read the Talk page; see how these mouth-breathers actually arrive at their “consensus.” That Schlafly kid is a real piece of work.