All Right!!!!

Let's see the conservative Big Oil supporting Christians go after John McCain instead of Al Gore for a while.

Well being a Repug, Mccain has certainly produced more methane.....kinda goes without saying.........uh huh.....

I seem to remember Gore trying to get the senate's involved in global warming about 25 or 30 YEARS ago and getting totally ignored?

Yeah, I was wondering how Graham's argument could logically come to be made, but I worked it out: Sen. Lindsey Graham is a lying sack of slime.

Arrggghh Man-bear-pig.

Typical Repub managerial attitude: pin the blame on someone when they promote a dangerous new idea...until it's proven true. Then take the credit.

well with all that hot air leaking out of McOldGuy's piehole, I'd definitely say he is the man who has done to most to encourage global warming/climate change.

Well we better do something fast. The ice shelfs are melting and disappearing. In my area last spring and summer there were no bees. That has never happend before. This year I'm developing a bee and butterfly garden. I hope can we reverse the damage we are doing, if not, were screwed.

Neither.

Neither has done anything except obfuscate the problems of pollution. This is because neither of them are basing their arguments on human rights. One such right of humanity is the right to their person and property. If these things are violated, then the counter-party, if they can be proven to be guilty, would be liable to pay damages to the plaintiff.

But Gore and McCain do not see things this way. Gore in particular sees it as a way to gain power and control. McCain on the other hand is simply an uneducated and immoral person, so he probably doesn't even know what global warming is.

Notwithstanding the fact, of course, that the Earth has recently cooled so much that the previous 100 years of gain have been erased. This is fact, but you don't see MSM or politicians mentioning it, because it goes against their self interest, which is to keep the lid on the populace, and extract taxes from them for driving or refrigerating food. Gore also uses 20 times the national average in energy, while telling people to use less energy.

Finally, global climate change is not caused by mankind. It is caused by the sun's activity. CO2 changes LAG Earth temperature changes by about 800 years. When the Earth warms because of the Sun, CO2 rises 800 years later. And vice versa.

Global Warming is a complete HOAX. Hoaxes like these are necessary for the thousands of government paid scientists to get funding. Those who say it's a hoax, lose their funding. Moral hazard.

Drew @ 17:
Oh christ. another hotair leaking piehole. Do you tell yourself that so you can go on driving your 15-25 kpg pig forever? I'd tell you to pull your head out, but it's obviously on permanent placement up there.

Drew, baby...quit listening to Rush Blimpballs. Like the four servings biggie fries he has a day, he's bad for you. I know this because my officemate, who listens to that tub of defecation everyday, gives me the daily report like I give a fuck.

First of all, when was the last time Gore could have introduced any kind of bill?

Second, exactly what environmental bills has McCain himself introduced?

Drew @ 17:

Neither.

Neither has done anything except obfuscate the problems of pollution. This is because neither of them are basing their arguments on human rights. One such right of humanity is the right to their person and property. If these things are violated, then the counter-party, if they can be proven to be guilty, would be liable to pay damages to the plaintiff.

But Gore and McCain do not see things this way. Gore in particular sees it as a way to gain power and control. McCain on the other hand is simply an uneducated and immoral person, so he probably doesn't even know what global warming is.

Notwithstanding the fact, of course, that the Earth has recently cooled so much that the previous 100 years of gain have been erased. This is fact, but you don't see MSM or politicians mentioning it, because it goes against their self interest, which is to keep the lid on the populace, and extract taxes from them for driving or refrigerating food. Gore also uses 20 times the national average in energy, while telling people to use less energy.

Finally, global climate change is not caused by mankind. It is caused by the sun's activity. CO2 changes LAG Earth temperature changes by about 800 years. When the Earth warms because of the Sun, CO2 rises 800 years later. And vice versa.

Global Warming is a complete HOAX. Hoaxes like these are necessary for the thousands of government paid scientists to get funding. Those who say it's a hoax, lose their funding. Moral hazard.

Give us some peer reviewed papers(links), where you get the sun bullshit is causing climate change. I can link you to 100's of peer reviewed papers, that dispute the hoax and bad science you just threw out here. Before you make stupid statements, why not research the subject you are trying to talk about.

The Right-wingers will never accept Global Warming until they can't take a deep breath. They won't accept it until it is too late for the rest of us and their ugly grandchildren. Al Gore should have been President. The Bush EPA has to be sued to do what everybody already knows is the only sane thing to do. Where-0-where will that 'clean' nuclear waste be put? I can tell you where it ought to be stuck!!!

Hey, give Drew a break. What could 2,500 scientists around the world possible know...that he and Rush don't?

C'mon...

Drew @ 24:

miss_kitty Hussein @ 19:

Drew @ 17:
Oh christ. another hotair leaking piehole. Do you tell yourself that so you can go on driving your 15-25 kpg pig forever? I'd tell you to pull your head out, but it's obviously on permanent placement up there.

Don't own a car or truck. I take public trans like the geek I am...

Sez you.

On the internet, no one knows you're a dog...

Geno @ 29:

Hey, give Drew a break. What could 2,500 scientists around the world possible know...that he and Rush don't?

C'mon...

You mean the IPCC? Those 2,500 "scientists" did not have a consensus you know. As long as someone contributed to the study, their names went in. Many of them were not even scientists.

Also, many of the scientists on the IPCC DISAGREED with the report's final conclusion.

Finally, you may or may not know about this, but the conclusion of the IPCC report was made BEFORE HAND...BY POLITICIANS.

It was not a proper scientific study. It was biased and corrupted. Not to mention the fact that many of the scientists in that study need to say it is real because that is the source of their living.

This is not just some babble wingnut shite used in a desperate attempt at discrediting an otherwise sound study. But the IPCC was not scientific, it was political, and thus immoral and corrupt.

miss_kitty Hussein @ 31:

Drew @ 24:

miss_kitty Hussein @ 19:

Drew @ 17:
Oh christ. another hotair leaking piehole. Do you tell yourself that so you can go on driving your 15-25 kpg pig forever? I'd tell you to pull your head out, but it's obviously on permanent placement up there.

Don't own a car or truck. I take public trans like the geek I am...

Sez you.

On the internet, no one knows you're a dog...

That's true. I could be a dog. But then you have to think why I would lie on an anonymous board. It's useless to lie on the internet, because you will be caught. That's why the internet is the best media and source for knowledge there is.

diamondmc @ 25:

Drew @ 17:

Neither.

Neither has done anything except obfuscate the problems of pollution. This is because neither of them are basing their arguments on human rights. One such right of humanity is the right to their person and property. If these things are violated, then the counter-party, if they can be proven to be guilty, would be liable to pay damages to the plaintiff.

But Gore and McCain do not see things this way. Gore in particular sees it as a way to gain power and control. McCain on the other hand is simply an uneducated and immoral person, so he probably doesn't even know what global warming is.

Notwithstanding the fact, of course, that the Earth has recently cooled so much that the previous 100 years of gain have been erased. This is fact, but you don't see MSM or politicians mentioning it, because it goes against their self interest, which is to keep the lid on the populace, and extract taxes from them for driving or refrigerating food. Gore also uses 20 times the national average in energy, while telling people to use less energy.

Finally, global climate change is not caused by mankind. It is caused by the sun's activity. CO2 changes LAG Earth temperature changes by about 800 years. When the Earth warms because of the Sun, CO2 rises 800 years later. And vice versa.

Global Warming is a complete HOAX. Hoaxes like these are necessary for the thousands of government paid scientists to get funding. Those who say it's a hoax, lose their funding. Moral hazard.

Give us some peer reviewed papers(links), where you get the sun bullshit is causing climate change. I can link you to 100's of peer reviewed papers, that dispute the hoax and bad science you just threw out here. Before you make stupid statements, why not research the subject you are trying to talk about.

Still waiting for you to back your shit up, or are you just trolling?

diamondmc @ 37:

diamondmc @ 25:

Drew @ 17:

Neither.

Neither has done anything except obfuscate the problems of pollution. This is because neither of them are basing their arguments on human rights. One such right of humanity is the right to their person and property. If these things are violated, then the counter-party, if they can be proven to be guilty, would be liable to pay damages to the plaintiff.

But Gore and McCain do not see things this way. Gore in particular sees it as a way to gain power and control. McCain on the other hand is simply an uneducated and immoral person, so he probably doesn't even know what global warming is.

Notwithstanding the fact, of course, that the Earth has recently cooled so much that the previous 100 years of gain have been erased. This is fact, but you don't see MSM or politicians mentioning it, because it goes against their self interest, which is to keep the lid on the populace, and extract taxes from them for driving or refrigerating food. Gore also uses 20 times the national average in energy, while telling people to use less energy.

Finally, global climate change is not caused by mankind. It is caused by the sun's activity. CO2 changes LAG Earth temperature changes by about 800 years. When the Earth warms because of the Sun, CO2 rises 800 years later. And vice versa.

Global Warming is a complete HOAX. Hoaxes like these are necessary for the thousands of government paid scientists to get funding. Those who say it's a hoax, lose their funding. Moral hazard.

Give us some peer reviewed papers(links), where you get the sun bullshit is causing climate change. I can link you to 100's of peer reviewed papers, that dispute the hoax and bad science you just threw out here. Before you make stupid statements, why not research the subject you are trying to talk about.

Still waiting for you to back your shit up, or are you just trolling?

Sorry, this shit is in my head, sometimes it takes me a while to sort it all out. But all of what I said can be found using the net. I am not just trolling. I personally don't like to have to link to everything, because that would take forever.

I can tell you that I swear on my life that this is as much as I know about such an important topic, and the knowledge I have can be found. The truth is out there.

I promise that if you do a couple of quick Google searches, the answers will be on the first page of hits.

I would much rather debate with people on what we know rather than how good we are at looking stuff up. It's more fun and it makes us all smarter people.

Knowledge does not exist unless it is INTERNALIZED.

Not like our contemporary educational system that is designed to not encumber students with any actual knowledge, but rather an ability to "look it up". I like it better when brains display the ability to recall without reference. That's the art of debating. Watch all the best debaters in the world, they do not have laptops with them when arguing. They just go at it. That's why I try to live up to that....

diamondmc, here's a link for you concerning scientists who were once in favor of the theory that climate change is heavily impacted by human activity, but who are now opposed to that theory.

http://www.speroforum.com/site/article.asp?idarticle=9469

Please remember i remain skeptical, about both sides of the argument and therefor believe neither side. But i do think we shouldnt just plug our fingers in our ears and get hostile when someone disagrees with you.

fellow_voyager @ 41:

diamondmc, here's a link for you concerning scientists who were once in favor of the theory that climate change is heavily impacted by human activity, but who are now opposed to that theory.

http://www.speroforum.com/site/article.asp?idarticle=9469

Please remember i remain skeptical, about both sides of the argument and therefor believe neither side. But i do think we shouldnt just plug our fingers in our ears and get hostile when someone disagrees with you.

Good, there's one reference.

Private citizens can introduce bills in the Senate now??? Or Graham is just crazy?..... Never mind....

Drew - SCIENTISTS have produced further compelling evidence showing that modern-day climate change is not caused by changes in the Sun's activity.

since you are fond of BBC.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7329799.stm

and all Gore did was over hype and lie about the situation.....

chris @ 48:

and all Gore did was over hype and lie about the situation.....

Ok I'll bite... Where has Gore lied?

Jay Severin Has A Small Pen1s @ 42:

It's pretty bogus to think that human beings don't effect the environment, climate or quality of life.

I mean, just throw a keg party and you'll see a microcosm of the issue.

Play my Armageddon game:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OftwKZtwSfE

I think humans do affect the environment. But I don't think this is a bad thing. Like don't you think it's a pretty assertion to assume that an unchanged Earth is optimal? Why do you think humans should not affect the world? Or do you? Not sure actually. But in any event, if humans did affect the world, it is destiny. We are a part of nature, so everything we do is natural and not something to hate or fear.

Imagine what the world would look like in a million years. The Earth will be one giant city, with man-made oxygen generators. It will be a world in which we create it to best suit what it means to be human.

If this is what the Earth will look like in a million years, why try to stop it?

diamondmc @ 46:

Drew @ 39:

diamondmc @ 37:

diamondmc @ 25:
Still waiting for you to back your shit up, or are you just trolling?

[Deleted. Click the link for the comment or scroll up to read-Sitemonitor]

Nice try drew. Can't back your " sun is causing climate change", so you tell us to look it up? You are the one who stated it as fact. It seems to me, that it is up to you to back your own shit up, not us. Still looks like your trolling to me.

HAHAHA

You know what's funny?

How we're now having a debate on who's lazier. It's true!

The sun is causing climate change. Just spend like, 5 seconds googling that shit. Trust me, I'm not lying...

Drew @ 52:

Jay Severin Has A Small Pen1s @ 42:

It's pretty bogus to think that human beings don't effect the environment, climate or quality of life.

I mean, just throw a keg party and you'll see a microcosm of the issue.

Play my Armageddon game:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OftwKZtwSfE

I think humans do affect the environment. But I don't think this is a bad thing. Like don't you think it's a pretty assertion to assume that an unchanged Earth is optimal? Why do you think humans should not affect the world? Or do you? Not sure actually. But in any event, if humans did affect the world, it is destiny. We are a part of nature, so everything we do is natural and not something to hate or fear.

Imagine what the world would look like in a million years. The Earth will be one giant city, with man-made oxygen generators. It will be a world in which we create it to best suit what it means to be human.

If this is what the Earth will look like in a million years, why try to stop it?

What are you, nine years old? Do you even read what you say? You throw out bullshit, and try to say its fact, but you have no facts. Rush would be proud of you. Go take a science class, and then get back to us.

diamondmc @ 50:

chris @ 48:

and all Gore did was over hype and lie about the situation.....

Ok I'll bite... Where has Gore lied?

The Science is not in, we still have scientist and article that are questioning it, I think their was an article linked on drudge that the earth has not gotten warmer in like 5 years..

fellow_voyager @ 55:

well....i dont know if i would go that far Drew. While I remain skeptical about global warming (read: not sure one way or the other) that doesnt mean that humans should be free to pollute however they want.

You're right, that would be stupid. That's why I personally like to go by human rights violations as standard.

If I dump my trash in your yard, I'm obviously guilty. But if I drive my imaginary car, I am not, because there is no way to discern who is guilty. So yes there are limits when it comes to human rights. Humans adapt to mild forms of atmospheric changes such as carbon emissions. I'm not afraid. We're tough SOBs. We have, in the period of rapid industrialization, increased our life spans from 35 years to 72 years. Not friggin bad if you ask me. I'll take the occasional asthma attack in order to be able to live almost twice as long as our ancestors. We'll develop a cure for asthma and we're golden.

chris @ 59:

diamondmc @ 50:

chris @ 48:

and all Gore did was over hype and lie about the situation.....

Ok I'll bite... Where has Gore lied?

The Science is not in, we still have scientist and article that are questioning it, I think their was an article linked on drudge that the earth has not gotten warmer in like 5 years..

Drudge...yeah...hey chris, I'd like you to meet Drew, who finds shit on the net. I think you two have a lot in common.

chris @ 59:

diamondmc @ 50:

chris @ 48:

and all Gore did was over hype and lie about the situation.....

Ok I'll bite... Where has Gore lied?

The Science is not in, we still have scientist and article that are questioning it, I think their was an article linked on drudge that the earth has not gotten warmer in like 5 years..

Drudge? are you kidding? Thats you source on Gore? Give us a break.

diamondmc @ 62:

Drew @ 54:

diamondmc @ 46:

Drew @ 39:
Nice try drew. Can't back your " sun is causing climate change", so you tell us to look it up? You are the one who stated it as fact. It seems to me, that it is up to you to back your own shit up, not us. Still looks like your trolling to me.

HAHAHA

You know what's funny?

How we're now having a debate on who's lazier. It's true!

The sun is causing climate change. Just spend like, 5 seconds googling that shit. Trust me, I'm not lying...

I did google climate change, and could not find one scientific peer reviewed paper that supports your claim, that the sun is the cause for the climate changes we are seeing.

OK, so peer review is your basis for knowledge. That's fine. It's not how I roll. Einstein was right before the peer review, so was everyone else. Sometimes the peer review process cannot produce 100% truth. Don;t get me wrong, the peer review process is a great method, but it's not foolproof. Climate change is, in my judgment, one of those things that hasn't been settled yet 100%. This is not because I have this unfair bias of being apologetic to free enterprise no matter what the costs. it's more to do with principle and science.

I know it's hard to find stuff on the net.

For the sun's activity evidence, look up Dr. Piers Corbyn on Google video. He's the man.

Drew @ 64:

diamondmc @ 57:

Drew @ 52:

Jay Severin Has A Small Pen1s @ 42:

I think humans do affect the environment. But I don't think this is a bad thing. Like don't you think it's a pretty assertion to assume that an unchanged Earth is optimal? Why do you think humans should not affect the world? Or do you? Not sure actually. But in any event, if humans did affect the world, it is destiny. We are a part of nature, so everything we do is natural and not something to hate or fear.

Imagine what the world would look like in a million years. The Earth will be one giant city, with man-made oxygen generators. It will be a world in which we create it to best suit what it means to be human.

If this is what the Earth will look like in a million years, why try to stop it?

What are you, nine years old? Do you even read what you say? You throw out bullshit, and try to say its fact, but you have no facts. Rush would be proud of you. Go take a science class, and then get back to us.

I think those who took science classes and professed to know anything are the ones that need a slapping. I took science in school, doesn't make me aware. I only know what I know. Tell me what YOU think about stuff. This is anonymous, so you can whatever you like. Nobody is going to find out. That's the beauty of the net. We are all more or less anonymous, so don't be afraid to take the leap into making statements about stuff. I'll debate you for sure, but that's a good thing about C&L. It's a place to learn what the assholes in Washington are doing. This place keeps me in the loop, as it were.

Your right, C&l is a great site. If you want to debate politics, thats fine to give us your opinion. If you are going to debate science, opinion don't mean shit. Give me some facts to back up your scientific statements, and then we can debate.

Hey Drew. You won't see too many PHDs from Liberty University being hired by Exxon-Mobil. They'll take the support in the media, but when push comes to shove, Exxon wants people that know and believe in science. They count on carbon dating, geology, and earth sciences. They ain't lookin' for dinosaur fossils from 2000 years ago.

The scientist from Exxon KNOW fossil fuels have an effect on climate change. They just don't share that information with us because they get paid not to. Just like the scientists and researchers at the tobacco companies.

Jay Severin Has A Small Pen1s @ 71:

Hey Drew. You won't see too many PHDs from Liberty University being hired by Exxon-Mobil. They'll take the support in the media, but when push comes to shove, Exxon wants people that know and believe in science. They count on carbon dating, geology, and earth sciences. They ain't lookin' for dinosaur fossils from 2000 years ago.

The scientist from Exxon KNOW fossil fuels have an effect on climate change. They just don't share that information with us because they get paid not to. Just like the scientists and researchers at the tobacco companies.

So we have scientists being paid in oil, and scientists being paid in government, and where does that lead us? To arguing with each other instead of debating what we think. If you had to venture an opinion, what would it be?