Malkin has again given us a dose of her wordly views. Her reaction to the complaints the blogosphere has had over the ABC debate reality show? We are “ballistic.” Damn right we are, as well as most people who care about the future of our nation should be. We sat through almost an hour of tabloid style garbage, instead of hitting on things of substance. Of course, Malkin thinks our ideals of substance are fabricated: (link goes to Malkin’s site)
Don’t you know you’re supposed to just let the candidates bloviate about Compassion or Global Warming or Diversity or some other MSM-designated Important Issue?
Compassion, Global Warming and Diversity are only important to the mainstream media? I guess healthcare, gas prices, torture, FISA, the housing crisis, immigration, Afghanistan and education don’t even rank up there with MSM importance, since those issues weren’t even touched on.
We aren’t mad about the debate because we are Democrats, we are mad because we are Americans. Where is Malkin’s outrage? I guess she thinks immigration, FISA and Afghanistan are not important enough for our candidates to discuss.
No Trackbacks To “Does Malkin Not Care About Immigration Anymore?“
Malkins fading into oblivion. Why even give her space?
Ironic isn’t it, me commenting on someone unworthy of comment or consideration.
Her level of political sophistication is that of 17 year old deciding what cute, popular and athletic boy should be student body president.
I’d have been happy with such MSM-designated important issues, instead we got flag pins. Malkin is an idiot.
Waste of bandwidth
Leslie [Bitter Elitist Hussein] @ 4:
Not just flagpins…Chinese flagpins… complete with lead paint.
Who?
Her name doesn’t come up when I flip through my list of people that I give a damn about what they have to say.
Seem posse comitatus is back thanks to a quietly passed bit of legislation that got virtually no headline coverage. Don’t wake up the MSM - no confirmation from other sources yet but it’s a step in the right direction.
Congress Quietly Repeals Martial Law Provision
pril 17, 2008 in News by James Bovard | 35 comments
In late 2006, Congress revised the Posse Comitatus Act and the Insurrection Act to make it far easier for a president to declare martial law. Those changes were repealed at the end of this January as part of Public Law 110-181 (HR 4986), the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (signed into law by President Bush on January 28, 2008).
Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt), who championed the opposition to the original law, was also the hero of the repeal. It helped that all the nation’s governors opposed the 2006 law.
Boise State Professor Charlotte Twight, the author of the excellent Dependent on DC, alerted me to the change last night. I checked on Nexis and the only news coverage I found regarding the repeal was a 322-word Gannett News wire story from February 1 that focused on how the repeal made governors happy.
Thanks for the link,but I wouldn’t waste a milisecond on that pondscum’s site.
That picture makes her look like she needs to poop.
pissed off patricia @ 10:
Why even waste your breath with the compliment?
C+L “sweat equity shareholders” are kind of sending a message on this one to management.
This bitch is ugly! Don’t get me wrong, I would not consider her ugly at a glance. But her personality is poison, and it shows on her face when she speaks her BS.
please do not give her more press. she is a sad self hater. just let the sleeping dog lie :)
I fully expect her to flick a foot-long tongue at a passing fly at any given second.
kevin @ 14:
No kidding. I can think of million things worth covering rather then her deceitful mug.
Outside ABC, Malkin’s pea-sized brain (there was shrinkage! Shrinkage!) and the MSM world, most normal people see the brain as the hardware, the synapse firing patterns are the software, and psycho-actives and conscious ‘thoughts’ are like wild-card hackers cueing novelty awareness to retain our sense of interest and experience from atrophying. (thoughts tweak the synapse discharge patterns, thus morphing perception/awareness/experience) We designed ourselves to have a continuous experience of infinite possibilities and expressions. ABC, Malkin, and the MSM, quite simply, have fried mother boards, multiple bad sectors, and their exhaust fans stopped working quite a while ago so that what we’re generally hearing when you waste valuable seconds of your life to focus on their decaying electron shells of so-called “important issues”, is the super-heated exhaust exiting pell-mell from the only port that isn’t either charred or over-worked, instead jawing nonsense syllables stung together with cognitive dissonance for the benefit of the cerebrally handicapped and the incurious inbred (the GOP), all without that disagreeable and socially offensive odor.
Well. I think we’ve made our feelings known. That had a cleansing effect. Next.
Anybody who has the gall to defend the ABC debate is an idiot. Right, left, up or down, it doesn’t matter what your affiliation is, that debate should have been an outrage to anybody who sat through it. It didn’t talk about ANYTHING. Who gives a frogs fat ass about wearing a flag pin??? Seriously?! And the Jeremiah Wright issue is the equivalent of beating a dead horse.
Somebody needs to let me know when I can expect to stop paying $70 at the pump for a fill up.
Carl Gordon @ 17:
Huh?
I’ll tell you what I’m really angry about Michelle:
Anchor babies!
…all over her face.
Malkin….again….(yawn)… Shouldn’t someone have to pay a bar fine on her before she gets to open her piehole???? JD
An Asian(?) woman mocking diversity. The topsy-turvy, Lewis Carrol, mindf*#k world of the right wing sure is fun!
Hahaha….ahhh, Mmmmalkin. Where do they even grow fungi like her? I laugh at her.
The least you could have done was use the photo of Malkin with the hideously distorted scowl on her face . . .
It’s not surprising malkin doesn’t get why everyone is pissed she’s one of the reasons this garbage gets preference over real issues, she’s a shill to dumb down politics along with Coulter, O’Reilly, Hannity, Limbaugh, and the rest of the mudslinging tabloid types.
Carl Gordon @ 17:
Whoahh there, fella! Some-ah-times, less is more…
[my head hurts]
Drop out suggests an elective, selective, graceful process of detachment from involuntary or unconscious actions. Malkins to easy.
In order to become strong we need to wrestle with strong opponents.
pissed off patricia @ 10:
That picture makes ME want to poop.
GIRLS DON’T POOP.
more right wing hypocrisy
she, like all republicans is more concerned with superficial appearances of patriotism morality. Debate about substance only matters when they dont have power to dictate the outcome.
Well we do have “poop people” here.
Every family has one or two I suppose.
L.A. Confidential @ 34:
We never heard the world poop during my cosmopolitan childhood upbringing.
# 1 or #2 was about it.
kevin @ 14:
fix’d ;P
Albeit it is true. If we stop giving people like her attention, she will learn that everyone knows that she is a sleazy piece of trash who has no idea what she is talking about. Hell, half the time she is dissing herself. Thats what makes it so ironic about her stance on immigration.
Michelle Mentalcase
Another female GOP turd who isn’t worth a shit ……….
Malkin and poop? This is the best we’ve got today? I can talk shit with best of ‘em, but do we have anything better?
It was 1967 in the jungle near Nui Dat.
I could’a sworn she was with the VC diddybopping down the trail when we sprung the ambush!
I have to mention that your advertisement preceeding this message was from Bosley hair clinic and people are warned to stay far away from those butchers lest they disfigure you I know its paid advertisig but I’ve never heard of a satisfied client from those people. Out of their hundreds of Dr.’s they likely have a few who wont butcher you, the rest should be selling insurance
i can’t get over the fact that this Filipina is a “respected pundit” because she wrote the book on racial profiling. literally. and she’s all for it. irony or just stupidity ? you know my guess…
baylaw73 @ 24:
She’s locked into her views. The second she supports diversity her legion of playdoh-eaters will turn on her throw her under a bus.
EliteLemming @ 38
Sometimes, the simplest methods are the most effective.
Shes likes being exploited, the Reichwingers give her a microphone and tell her to bash immigrants and she gets her coveted attention and feels as though she knows what she is talking about. Its like Clarence Thomas being a conservative and voting against affirmative action. Self haters are given a ticket to the dance
Michelle Maglalang is nothing more than a republican concern troll. Who gives a royal rat’s ass what she thinks? Seriously, show of hands here. Who gives a fuck what this stupid c#@* thinks? Anyone, anyone? Bueller? Bueller? Malkin? Malkin? She needs to be marginalized like her media brethren, Ann Coulter, and all of the other right-wing viragoes. (look it up.)
EliteLemming @ 38:
What’s to talk about? The fact we’re talking about pondscum like her is a waste of valuable time.
Since Malkin doesn’t want presidential candidates talking about “compassion,” did she denounce George W. Bush when he was calling himself a “compassionate conservative?”
I didn’t think so.
The only time I’ve ever agreed with Michelle Malkin is when she called for the deportation of anchor babies… like Michelle Malkin.
She is certainly a funny color to be against immigration. Her family didn’t get off a boat too long ago.
Michelle Malkin…media whore extrodinaire!
Murddock is her mack daddy…”now git’ yo’ azz out there and make my money…biatch!
Stentor @ 45
Personally, I think tzitzimitl makes for a better obscur reference :P
Peter G @ 2:
Poetic, not ironic.
After we send a Democrat to the White House in ‘09, would it be asking to much to begin deportation proceedings against Michelle Malkin?? I really don’t give a fuck where she is sent, just get her out of this country.
Who gives a damn what Malkin thinks (if that’s not an oxymoron).
Nope. Not giving that bitch the satisfaction of another hit on her knuckle-dragging website.
geneHUSSEIN214 @ 53:
Well since she seems to live internment camps, how about Guantanamo?