Crooks and Liars in your InBox

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Search

Categories

Syndication

John Amato’s virtual online magazine…OK, It’s a blog!




Disenfranchising Indianan Nuns Gives Oklahoma GOP Ideas

Isn’t that just like the GOP?  Others hear about not letting 80 and 90 year old nuns vote and they shake their heads and say, “that’s awful.”  But the GOP–in this case the Oklahoma State Senate GOP majority–see it as opportunity.

Down With Tyranny:

All through history, the political left has agitated to expand the franchise. The left worked and fought yo abolish the rules that only allowed white Christian male property holders the right to vote. The political right fought to prevent poor people from voting, to prevent Jews, Blacks, women, young people… And a few weeks ago the rightist Supreme Court gave the thumbs up to a Republican scheme to limit voting in Indiana. We saw the first results of that ruling today.

About 12 Indiana nuns were turned away Tuesday from a polling place by a fellow bride of Christ because they didn’t have state or federal identification bearing a photograph.[..]

Tonight I got a notice from Andrew Rice alerting me that the Oklahoma Senate had prevented the Republicans from doing the same thing in his state. All of the GOP senators voted to restrict voting rights and all the Democrats voted to prevent them from shrinking the franchise.

The vote was 24-23 for the bill, but it takes 25 votes to pass a bill in the 48-member Senate. All 24 Republicans supported the plan, while 23 Democrats voted against it.

Democrats said the proposal was meant to help Republicans and would deter the elderly and other citizens from voting because they may not have identification readily available.

Ford said the bill is needed to guard against voter fraud.

Voter fraud is something the GOP gets hysterical about, like welfare fraud. And like welfare fraud the GOP turns reality on its head. They will wreck hundreds of thousands of families’ lives because a few dozens people or even a few hundred people may have committed fraud to the tune of some thousands of dollars– while corporate welfare goes out to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars. I can’t say that there has never been any voter fraud. But I can say the kind of voter fraud the Republicans talk about it nearly nonexistent or, at worst, extremely rare. Republican voter fraud, electronic voter fraud, voter suppression… now we’re talking about hundreds of thousands of voters.  Read on…

Andrew Rice is one of Blue America candidates.  If you’d like him to help us breakthrough the GOP juggernaut and deliver more and better Democrats, you can donate to his campaign here. 




No Trackbacks To “Disenfranchising Indianan Nuns Gives Oklahoma GOP Ideas“

76 Responses for “Disenfranchising Indianan Nuns Gives Oklahoma GOP Ideas”
1
Rusty Shackleford Says:

Curious how it’s only the GOP that wants to prevent people from voting. It’s almost like… they don’t think they could win a fair fight.

Naaah. Couldn’t be that.

2
wtf Says:

WTF are you talking about, turned away? They were NOT turned away. They were given the option to vote, and they refused to do so, because they said they couldn’t get to the DMV in the 10 following days to obtain a valid ID… One that’s given free, by the way!

There are plenty of real disenfranchisements and bad voter laws, but this is NOT one of those situations. To claim it as such just makes anyone who does so look like a lying idiot!

3
marko Says:

we need to clean some house

can you imagine if obama wins and then gets shot

it will spark a revolution

the people who want to disenfranchise us also want to kill us as well…they are killing some of us right now

4
randy Says:

Voter fraud? What, like the 2000 elections?

5
Rusty Shackleford Says:

I wonder how many nuns will be voting for the candidate who kowtows to a preacher who calls their church “the great whore.”

6
marko Says:

wtf @ 2:

WTF are you talking about, turned away? They were NOT turned away. They were given the option to vote, and they refused to do so, because they said they couldn’t get to the DMV in the 10 following days to obtain a valid ID… One that’s given free, by the way!

There are plenty of real disenfranchisements and bad voter laws, but this is NOT one of those situations. To claim it as such just makes anyone who does so look like a lying idiot!

if before the law they could vote without an ID

and then by passing the law they couldn’t

they have by definition been told they can’t vote!!

we don’t have to have an ID to breath or buy food or go to a ballgame

7
L.A. Confidential Says:

marko @ 6:

we don’t have to have an ID to breath or buy food or go to a ballgame

Don’t be giving them any more ideas now.

8
L.A. Confidential Says:

I think we’re going to have another web site crash here soon. Again.
[We’re working on it LA. Site Monitor]

9
Don Davis Says:

Voter ID Law in Indiana Prevents Jesus From Voting

10
Doug Says:

Here is Kansas the Republican GOP majority passed bills to disenfranchise voters. Thankfully we have a Democratic governor who is going to veto it. There probably won’t be enough votes in the House to override the veto. But as with the coal votes in Kansas the Republicans will keep on pushing it to absurdity.

11
JudyLou Says:

marko @ 2:

we need to clean some house

can you imagine if obama wins and then gets shot

it will spark a revolution

the people who want to disenfranchise us also want to kill us as well…they are killing some of us right now

I’m afraid I must agree, that violence should be expected. Those people who’ve been calling the shots for 8 years won’t want to give up their unbridled power. We’ve seen they can’t really win in a fair fight, so like all bullies, they’ll resort to the fist.

I hope I’m wrong.

12
Fanon Says:

L.A. Confidential @ 7:

I think we’re going to have another web site crash here soon. Again.
[We’re working on it LA. Site Monitor]

Oh, good. I thought it was just my computer. Not that I’m happy your website is having trouble ;)

13
dosido Says:

it takes a fraud to know a fraud…

Rusty Shackleford @ 4:

I wonder how many nuns will be voting for the candidate who kowtows to a preacher who calls their church “the great whore.”

Yeah, good question. LOL.

15
L.A. Confidential Says:

L.A. Confidential @ 7:

I think we’re going to have another web site crash here soon. Again.
[We’re working on it LA. Site Monitor]

Good. I hope you find the bastards.

randy @ 3:

Voter fraud? What, like the 2000 elections?

You forgot 2004 and 2006 and probably 2008.

Randy,
GOP voter fraud doesn’t count though.

18
JonKeer Says:

marko @ 5:

wtf @ 2:

WTF are you talking about, turned away? They were NOT turned away. They were given the option to vote, and they refused to do so, because they said they couldn’t get to the DMV in the 10 following days to obtain a valid ID… One that’s given free, by the way!

if before the law they could vote without an ID

and then by passing the law they couldn’t

stop. right there. nobody told them they couldn’t vote.

judging by the awful decisions most people make at the polls (including whether or not to even show up), i don’t think the problem is that it’s just too hard to vote in america.

19
L.A. Confidential Says:

Fanon @ 11:

L.A. Confidential @ 7:

I think we’re going to have another web site crash here soon. Again.
[We’re working on it LA. Site Monitor]

Oh, good. I thought it was just my computer. Not that I’m happy your website is having trouble ;)

Nope someone out there in cyber land is trying to nuke this site. Thats totally obvious.

20
Rusty Shackleford Says:

JonKeer @ 17:

marko @ 5:

wtf @ 2:

WTF are you talking about, turned away? They were NOT turned away. They were given the option to vote, and they refused to do so, because they said they couldn’t get to the DMV in the 10 following days to obtain a valid ID… One that’s given free, by the way!

if before the law they could vote without an ID

and then by passing the law they couldn’t

stop. right there. nobody told them they couldn’t vote.

Same argument would apply to poll taxes and literacy tests. Nobody told those poor and illiterate people they couldn’t vote.

21
Crazy8 Says:

Who in the hell is Ford? I have reread the article and can not find a first name. Is this an automobile talking? I could do a google search but Ford id a common name. I know that I’m not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but I am stumped.

22
Samson- Says:

GOP: Grand Ole Ploy

23
ysbaddaden Says:

They’ve been relieved of their habits

to vote.

24
ysbaddaden Says:

Crazy8 @ 20:

Who in the hell is Ford? I have reread the article and can not find a first name. Is this an automobile talking? I could do a google search but Ford id a common name. I know that I’m not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but I am stumped.

That’s why you should handle it blade outwards.

25
Mark N. Says:

Voter fraud is something the GOP gets hysterical about, like welfare fraud.

It would sure be nice if they were to be as incensed about warfare fraud. But I guess causing the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent people, like the character of Lex Luthor in the first Christopher Reeve “Superman” movie, is how they get their kicks.

26
ysbaddaden Says:

JonKeer @ 17:

marko @ 5:

wtf @ 2:

WTF are you talking about, turned away? They were NOT turned away. They were given the option to vote, and they refused to do so, because they said they couldn’t get to the DMV in the 10 following days to obtain a valid ID… One that’s given free, by the way!

I like to vote hard

They have those touch-screen voting machines in Dallas now.

if before the law they could vote without an ID

and then by passing the law they couldn’t

stop. right there. nobody told them they couldn’t vote.

judging by the awful decisions most people make at the polls (including whether or not to even show up), i don’t think the problem is that it’s just too hard to vote in america.

27
♠Bangkok-Bob♠ Says:

Rusty Shackleford @ 1:

Curious how it’s only the GOP that wants to prevent people from voting. It’s almost like… they don’t think they could win a fair fight.

Naaah. Couldn’t be that.

They can’t … look how they got their boy george in office, fixed votes in Florida and then SCOTUS steps in and goes against the popular vote.

28
ysbaddaden Says:

ysbaddaden @ 25:
Oopsie

JonKeer @ 17:

marko @ 5:

wtf @ 2:

They have those touch-screen voting machines in Dallas now.

if before the law they could vote without an ID

and then by passing the law they couldn’t

stop. right there. nobody told them they couldn’t vote.

judging by the awful decisions most people make at the polls (including whether or not to even show up), i don’t think the problem is that it’s just too hard to vote in america.

I like to vote hard

They have those touch-screen voting machines in Dallas now.

29
chaos4700 Says:

They’re trying to push voter ID in Wisconsin too. And to those of you who think it’s trivial: when’s the last time you tried to get an ID at the DMV, hmm? Last time I went it cost me two hours and $20. And they don’t have waiting room seating any more. You tell me you’re fine with your 90-year old grandmother on fixed income standing around in a DMV lobby for a couple of hours and then we’ll see how “compassionate” conservativism really is.

And don’t think it’ll end with this. The next step is to make ID harder to get and more expensive to have.

30
♠Bangkok-Bob♠ Says:

C&L must be having server problems, or maybe my anonymous server has the hiccups.

31
Big Dick Cheney Says:

[Deleted, posting in all caps. Please stop. Site Monitor]

32
ThunderMonkey Says:

randy @ 3:

Voter fraud? What, like the 2000 elections?

That’s not voter fraud… that’s election fraud.

33
5by5 Says:

So-called “voter fraud” is so microscopically rare, as to be statistically irrelevant. It simply doesn’t happen (unless you’re Ann Coulter). Voting on an individual basis is such a giant pain in the ass generally, that no individual is going to do such a thing, unless they’re some myopic Limbaugh dittohead.

ELECTION Fraud on the other hand is rampant.

That is large-scale illegal manipulation of the voting process by one party or it’s agents through caging lists that target individuals for their race, age, or economic status, phone jamming, intentional disinformation campaigns to deter or prevent voters from going to the polls, tearing up Democratic registrations, tossing out provisional ballots by the millions rather than counting them, and of course, outright hacking the vote with viruses and code designed to flip electronic votes in the middle of the night.

That the Republicans do regularly.

L.A. Confidential @ 18:

Nope someone out there in cyber land is trying to nuke this site. Thats totally obvious.

Perhaps someone didn’t much care for the telecom legislation post?

35
ysbaddaden Says:

Wahlen verbotten!!

36
OldCoastie Says:

So, does this mean we will seat Michigan and Florida?

37
scinerd1 Says:

Here in Missouri we are fighting the same thing, but it has a chance of passing. A constitutional amendment to enact new voter-id rules should pass the house today and go on to the senate. We may not be able to stop it there with Republican majorities in both chambers. Gov. Blunt is sure to sign it and then probably authorize a special election so voters can approve it and have the law in place for the November election. With one week to go in the session, the state Republicans are working HARD to disenfranchise Missourians. A coalition has quickly formed to fight it and appears to have the support of Sec. of state Robin Carnahan. Let’s hope we can stop it.

38
5by5 Says:

Oh PS. those relying on absentee ballots might want to pay a much closer eye on that process in their respective states.

Most people assume that when they put their ballot in the mail, that it goes directly to the elections office. not necessarily.

In many states, it first goes to a private “sorting center” that is a subsidiary of…. wait for it….. Diebold Inc.

many of those Democratic ballots may just uh, fall off a truck, so to speak, or worse, get “counted” by their “Vote Remote” system, which has been certified by exactly no one.

More here:

http://www.bbvforums.org/cgi-b...../8542.html

Best of all the security firewall for that little system is made by SAIC, the defense contractor, who of course, would have absolutely no interest in say, seeing a war-mongering Republican get elected so that they could continue their war profiteering, right?

Of course not…… [smirk]

39
♠Bangkok-Bob♠ Says:

Il presidente Bush ed il vice presidente Cheney dovrebbero essere messi in prigione per i crimini di guerra.

40
givemeabreak Says:

Are you people blind!? Voter fraud is RAMPANT!

Woman registers her dog to vote; prosecutors growl
By Keith Ervin

Seattle Times staff reporter

Jane Balogh had a pretty good idea who was calling when the phone rang and the caller asked for Duncan M. MacDonald.

Duncan is the dog Balogh registered as a voter seven months before the November 2006 election.

Duncan’s absentee-ballot envelope was signed with a picture of a paw print.

“You can’t sign with a paw print,” the election worker told Balogh on Nov. 9.

“I said, ‘he can if he’s a dog,’ ” answered Balogh, a 66-year-old grandmother and Army veteran who lives in Federal Way.

The election worker told her a supervisor would call, but she never heard from anyone.

After making her point — how easy it is for a voter to register illegally — Balogh will be arraigned in King County Superior Court on Tuesday on a misdemeanor charge of making a false statement to a public official.

If she declines to plead guilty, prosecutors told her in a letter this week, they will file a felony charge of providing false information on a voter-registration application. She doesn’t plan to contest the misdemeanor: “I’m not going to claim to be innocent when I know I’m guilty.”

Balogh’s crime was signing Duncan’s name on a registration card under a declaration that he meets all the requirements to vote. She submitted ballots in his name in the September and November 2006 and May 2007 elections. She wrote “VOID” on the ballots, and didn’t cast any votes.

Balogh, who lives with Duncan, an Australian shepherd-terrier mix, and four other dogs and four cats, registered her dog as a protest of a 2005 state voter-registration statute that she says makes it too easy for noncitizens to vote. She put her phone bill in Duncan’s name, then used the phone bill as identification to register him as a voter.

41
French voter Says:

Well pretty much all of Europe demands you to have an ID with your picture on it to be able to vote (as well as your voter card)
So it does seem to be a reasonable addition to the law, as you can’t really say Europe leans the Republican way.

But we also use paper ballots rather then 100% electronics machine. Thats I think is a much bigger problem in the United States.

42
Threevok Says:

By now we should all see that the Republicans have only scorn for Democracy.

Freedom to them has NOTHING to do with voting, or democracy-its all about capitalism- the FREEDOM to make money.

My prediction? Obama will win the election, but Mccain will be installed….
The Democrats in the House and Senate will once again fall to their knees and do whatever the Republicans want.
The moment this country arrogantly insisted it had the right to torture, it lost all credibility…
 
I am concerned that the Republicans will try and steal this election…

43
Samson- Says:

givemeabreak @ 39:

Are you people blind!? Voter fraud is RAMPANT!

Woman registers her dog to vote; prosecutors growl
By Keith Ervin

Seattle Times staff reporter

Jane Balogh had a pretty good idea who was calling when the phone rang and the caller asked for Duncan M. MacDonald.

Duncan is the dog Balogh registered as a voter seven months before the November 2006 election.

Duncan’s absentee-ballot envelope was signed with a picture of a paw print.

“You can’t sign with a paw print,” the election worker told Balogh on Nov. 9.

“I said, ‘he can if he’s a dog,’ ” answered Balogh, a 66-year-old grandmother and Army veteran who lives in Federal Way.

The election worker told her a supervisor would call, but she never heard from anyone.

After making her point — how easy it is for a voter to register illegally — Balogh will be arraigned in King County Superior Court on Tuesday on a misdemeanor charge of making a false statement to a public official.

If she declines to plead guilty, prosecutors told her in a letter this week, they will file a felony charge of providing false information on a voter-registration application. She doesn’t plan to contest the misdemeanor: “I’m not going to claim to be innocent when I know I’m guilty.”

Balogh’s crime was signing Duncan’s name on a registration card under a declaration that he meets all the requirements to vote. She submitted ballots in his name in the September and November 2006 and May 2007 elections. She wrote “VOID” on the ballots, and didn’t cast any votes.

Balogh, who lives with Duncan, an Australian shepherd-terrier mix, and four other dogs and four cats, registered her dog as a protest of a 2005 state voter-registration statute that she says makes it too easy for noncitizens to vote. She put her phone bill in Duncan’s name, then used the phone bill as identification to register him as a voter.

is it?

is that your evidence that it is “RAMPANT”?

on a tangent: i find it quite amusing (in a non-humorous way) the way the GOP frames this issue of voter fraud, yet smiles and farts as rush ‘mmmmmmm oxy’ limbaugh uses the public airwaves to distort the primaries.

as usual, the GOP is as hypocritical as they are corrupt

44
Chico Hussein Says:

marko @ 5:

wtf @ 2:

WTF are you talking about, turned away? They were NOT turned away. They were given the option to vote, and they refused to do so, because they said they couldn’t get to the DMV in the 10 following days to obtain a valid ID… One that’s given free, by the way!

There are plenty of real disenfranchisements and bad voter laws, but this is NOT one of those situations. To claim it as such just makes anyone who does so look like a lying idiot!

if before the law they could vote without an ID

and then by passing the law they couldn’t

they have by definition been told they can’t vote!!

we don’t have to have an ID to breath or buy food or go to a ballgame….

… or to cast an absentee ballot.

45
Chico Hussein Says:

givemeabreak @ 39:

Are you people blind!? Voter fraud is RAMPANT!

Woman registers her dog to vote; prosecutors growl
By Keith Ervin

Seattle Times staff reporter

Jane Balogh had a pretty good idea who was calling when the phone rang and the caller asked for Duncan M. MacDonald.

Duncan is the dog Balogh registered as a voter seven months before the November 2006 election.

Duncan’s absentee-ballot envelope was signed with a picture of a paw print.

“You can’t sign with a paw print,” the election worker told Balogh on Nov. 9.

“I said, ‘he can if he’s a dog,’ ” answered Balogh, a 66-year-old grandmother and Army veteran who lives in Federal Way.

The election worker told her a supervisor would call, but she never heard from anyone.

After making her point — how easy it is for a voter to register illegally — Balogh will be arraigned in King County Superior Court on Tuesday on a misdemeanor charge of making a false statement to a public official.

If she declines to plead guilty, prosecutors told her in a letter this week, they will file a felony charge of providing false information on a voter-registration application. She doesn’t plan to contest the misdemeanor: “I’m not going to claim to be innocent when I know I’m guilty.”

Balogh’s crime was signing Duncan’s name on a registration card under