John Edwards Stands Up For The Constitution In FISA Battle
By Logan Murphy Thursday Jan 24, 2008 9:11pm
We've been waiting for one of the presidential candidates to take the lead on this issue and are pleased to see John step up for the American people.
Via John Edwards' Blog:
When it comes to protecting the rule of law, words are not enough. We need action.
It's wrong for your government to spy on you. That's why I'm asking you to join me today in calling on Senate Democrats to filibuster revisions to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) that would give "retroactive immunity" to the giant telecom companies for their role in aiding George W. Bush's illegal eavesdropping on American citizens.
The Senate is debating this issue right now -- which is why we must act right now. You can find your Senators' phone numbers here or call the Senate Switchboard at 1-(202)-224-3121. Read on...
(Read the rest of this story...)
Granting retroactive immunity is wrong. It will let corporate law-breakers off the hook. It will hamstring efforts to learn the truth about Bush's illegal spying program. And it will flip on its head a core principle that has guided our nation since our founding: the belief that no one, no matter how well connected or what office they hold, is above the law.
But in Washington today, the telecom lobbyists have launched a full-court press for retroactive immunity. George Bush and Dick Cheney are doing everything in their power to ensure it passes. And too many Senate Democrats are ready to give the lobbyists and the Bush administration exactly what they want.
Please join me in calling on every Senate Democrat to do everything in their power -- including joining Senator Dodd's efforts to filibuster this legislation -- to stop retroactive immunity and stand up for the rule of law. The Constitution should not be for sale at any price.
Thank you for taking action.
John Edwards
January 24, 2008
Login or Register to post comments.
Oh, sure, now that he's effectively out of the race and has nothing to lose, suddenly principles matter?
Not to pick on Edwards. It just kills me that the Mod Squad has spent all this time clarifying who said what about who's momma and left all the heavy lifting to "lunatic fringe" candidates like Dodd (my first choice) and Kucinich (my second.)
It's good to know that one of the remaining candidates has chosen to "lead".
So says the guy that helped write part pf the Patriot Act and then voted for it.
edwards-Supporting the constitution since last week.
So says the guy that helped write part pf the Patriot Act and then voted for it.
Beat me to it. Feingold is right: this guy keeps tripping over his past. I wanted to like him, I really did...
I donated $100 to John's campaign today. I will be doing phonebanking for him tomorrow. I wonder where our two Movie Star frontrunner candidates were when this was being debated yesterday. Hillary and Obama need to get out of the way, so John Edwards, the REAL grownup in the race, can do his job, which is representing us like a grown up. Now watch Hillary and Obama come out tomorrow, steal his thunder, and come out strong against telecom immunity. Then the MSM will say Hillary and Obama took a strong stand against Telecom immunity! What a joke!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fh8DjrKSlwk
rule of law? you mean the constitution? LOL
Damn, I love this guy!
> edwards-Supporting the constitution since last week.
True, but, well, fuck, in my book that puts him a week ahead of everyone else in the race.
JasonS Says: Oh, sure, now that he’s effectively out of the race and has nothing to lose, suddenly principles matter?
I wouldn't count him out just yet. At least I hope not. ObieWan...errr...John is our only hope.
Sany @ 5:
Amen. Go John!
Explain.
About bleedin' time!
Wonder how the MSM is going to spin this as a conflict between Clinton and Obama?
any truth to Edward conspiring with Hillary? what was that all about?
Will the American people step up for John Edwards?
www.pafundi.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Number of Operations Iraq Freedom and Enduring Freedom casualties
as confirmed by U.S. Central Command: 4392
Yeah, what JasonS said (although I would leave out the expletive when I tell people at church what I think).
It is frustrating to watch someone finally "get it", but please don't shoot the people who just "got it", because then there's no one left except the people who haven't "gotten it" yet.
Yeah, Dodd was my first choice, and Dennis was my second choice. I'm planning to vote for someone who has "gotten it", and since that doesn't include all of the current candidates, my choice is still easier than it should be.
I wouldn't be offended if the rest of them bought a vowel, and then I could ask more of my candidate than "don't continue the march to a police state". Sadly, that's the most important thing I'm thinking about tonight.
Kucinich was for upholding the Constitution from day one. Where did it get him?
Kucinich spoke, no one listened, Now Edwards speaks along the same lines and it's worth noting. I call it BULLSHIT!
JasonS @ 1:
I tend to think the same way, JasonS. I'm not so sure that Edwards has nothing to lose, but I tend to have the same thoughts. Moreover, he's the one who's not in the Senate anymore. He couldn't go onto the floor in an official capacity to support Dodd if he wanted to. I really want to see Clinton and Obama stop campaigning for a while to take an important stand.
Dodd was my first choice as well. Kucinich my second as well. Would have voted for Richardson too. They always seem to drop out in some rough order my preferences, with the least desirable remaining. (Though I would never have voted for Biden in any Democratic primary.)
I suppose Edwards gets my vote on the 5th of Feb, for whatever it will be worth.
Go Edwards! Where are Obama and Clinton? They actually have votes.
John Edwards rocks!
Where have our two illustrous Frontrunners been on this issue. Haven't heard much from the Hillary or Obama camp on this. It's amazing. Where are all their fans. Too disappointed in them to even comment on it? You are all fools if you think Hillary or Obama are going to do anything for you. They are both taking you for a ride. This FISA Bill PROVES IT! Where are those two scared chickens. Fighting again. I suppose so. I guess John Edwards had to be the ADULT again, and get put it out in front of the MSM. I hope Edwards slams them GOOD on this during the next debate. I'd like to see both Hillary and Obama twist in the Wind over this. Oh I suppose their loyal fans will just ignore it and give them a free pass, just like everything else.
wijg @ 11:
The anti-Edwards trolldom in full force. Who knows of paulbots, shillary's, or Obama's. Ir, else. A lot of NEGATIVE ignorant trollllzzzzzzzzzz.
Edwards is the only Dem who can beat McCain in national poll. If Obama runs against McCain, he'll lose. Remember, this is the country that voted for George Bush twice.
paranoia @ 13:
BULLSHIT. It was.
Logan - thanks for posting this !!
mo_dems @ 22:
No, it didn't
fiver @ 25:
Ya beat me to it, fiver.
Not to mention that choosing candidates based on electability against Republicans is generally a fool's errand. Any candidate can run a strong campaign against them if s/he knows what s/he's doing. And no matter whom we nominate, they will sully and smear with everything they have and more.
Sany @ 20:
Very good question. Where the hell does Hillary and Obama stand on this? Are they not STILL ELECTED to the Senate? This is important legislation, and they can't take time from campaigning for this? So, if one of those two clowns is elected Prez, and they are up for re-election, and oh I don't know, nukes are heading at the US, they will not take time out of their campaigning to stop them or try to?? Me thinks these two just showed how deep they really do care about anything but being elected.
Thank you, MISTER PRESIDENT.
CappuccettoRosso @ 21:
Ahhh... is that it? Because I'm ready to pounce, although I'm getting ready to eat dinner... Hope you're still around to cover.
At least he's standing up NOW. He said he regrets the Vote to authorize a fake war. Now he's stepping up and helping Dodd stand up to these assholes in the White House. Good for him. Remember people who the enemy is. Stop immunity.
fiver @ 25:
It sure as hell didn't the first time. The first time it was the supreme court that voted him in.
ConcernedCanuck @ 27:
Well...they kind of decided it was not worth their time to vote on this. That's right, they could not be bothered to vote on FISA. Guess it must not be that important after all.
Ted @ 14:
I really wish Edwards was still in the Senate so we'd know for sure. It's easier to say this when you won't have to actually back it up. I really want to like Edwards. I just wish there was some test to show that he is for real, because I'm not convinced yet.
GDliberal @ 3:
Tell me: what part of it did he write? Might it be the sunset clause, which wasn't in there before?
Or maybe you'd prefer that the PA never expired, so it would be still be in force in the original form with no chance for revision.
That's your choice.
JasonS @ 1:
instead of being such a whiney asshole, show some balls for a candidate that has
the balls to stand up against bushco and the establishment. put that passion you
seem to have and help john edwards win. whimping out does not help anyone.
dadams @ 36:
You have a very funny conception of "whiney" and "whimping out." And you have inferred all sorts of things JasonS never implied.
QuakerDave @ 4:
you and #3, put some honest spine behind your words and get over your apparent
distrust of everyone running in this election. everyone of the candidates have
some strong negatives and positives. try and work towards restoring the
USA to a reputable country with a strong leader and not the lying asshole
we have now. please take this as an observation and not personally.
Edwards 08 ! Our only hope.
So am I clear on this that the nasty rumor of Edward conspiring with Hillary is just to throw people off of Edward? So the media that reported this don't want us to vote for him?
Seem like there making a lot of effort to focus on non news item, such as his hundred dollar hair.
I did see that survey that Edward has the best chance to beat the Republican. Makes sense as he is the most un-Republican like figure. I guess many people don't realize that the Clintons are actually member of the Democratic conservative party.
Unfortunately, the news won't broadcast what John Edwards is saying about wire tapping. We are reading it on crooks and liars.... most people won't read this blog.
fiver @ 25:
jesus. ok. half the voting public of this country voted for bush. twice.
Edwards admits his mistakes. That, in and of itself should say something. You name any other politician or pundit that has done that.
They don't stand up to Bushco because the illegal spying wasn't just on suspected terrorists, I'll bet, but on the political opposition as well. Bush has the goods on the lot of 'em, which he must remind them of whenever they appear to be growing a spine. What other explanation is there? He's collected embarrassing files on them all . . .
Karen @ 37:
just my observation. i am interested in pushing for the passion of conviction.
I forgot, Keith is pretty darn decent in that way, too.
GET OUT AND VOTE FOR EDWARDS! AND SEND M O N E Y!
mo_dems @ 42:
Sorry, but it's still kind of a sore subject. :evil:
Watergate premises was that they spied on the opposition, and I would say that Bush is Nixon on steroid, and that he must of got it from the baseball team he owned.
Philip Graham @ 44:
OR.....there really is only ONE elected party in the US government with two sub-names?
I'm sorry, but here is the truth. I've been reading the boards. Some said that this is what it takes low blows to win elections, that people want the Clintons back in office because deep down people like this stuff, that the doodee (not the cream) floats to the top of the political toilet, that the Democrats and the Republican politicians are part and parcel floating next to each other, and that the Clintons will do and say anything, absolutely anything, to float their way back into the top of the White Bowl.
Obama is running on platform to change American politics, to try to take it out of a back alley street fight and add some rules against biting, groin shots, head butts and the like. The Clintons are doing everything they can to drag Obama back into that alley. This latest Clinton move today is really low. Hillary says Bill says he's sorry that "maybe" he went overboard in beating on Obama. It's professional alright. Professional wrestling. After all the Clinton distortions of Obama's statement about Reagan and falsely accusing Obama of making up fairytales about his superior record on the Iraq war, now Bill says he's sorry. Only he doesn't say it. His wife does. Tag team!
What makes me really sick is that the Clintons are race baiting to try to divide the electorate in South Carolina to scaremonger the white vote away from their opponent. The Clintons would love for this election to be about race and gender, old identity politics, vote for your own and screw the rest who aren't like you, because there are more women likely to vote for the Clintons than blacks likely to vote for Obama. The white women versus the blacks. Great. This sounds like race baiting in the old segregated South that the Clintons so rail against. Now that's selflessness for you! And to those who say they are no better than the Republicans, I agree that the Clintons give Karl Rove a run for his money.
You know how we know for sure the Clintons are the wrong choice? Because the New York Times endorses them. In a totally vapid and insipid piece, the NYT said they endorse the Clintons because, among other things, Hillary got it wrong on the war but somehow she is more right on the consequences of withdrawal. What the heck are they talking about?
Here is the plain truth the NYT acts like doesn't exist. Hillary Clinton totally screwed up the most important vote of her career in an admitted gigantic error in judgment. She was a sheep. The self-proclaimed "workhorse" didn't even read the National Intelligence Estimate at the time, not even after the most senior Democratic Senator in military affairs personally asked her to. Unbelievably, Hillary Clinton still can't admit she made an error, much more a gigantic one.
Hillary is still spinning her reasons for voting for the resolution by saying she didn't vote for war - she says she just voted to authorize Bush to use force. She is in denial about the fact she didn't vote for another resolution that said exactly that. As for her plans to disengage in Iraq, they are no better or more clear than Obama's. And unlike Hillary who has burned every bridge with the Republicans (the latest NBC/WSJ poll today shows Obama beats McCain and Hillary does not - I wonder why), Obama could reach across the aisle and grab someone like a Colin Powell to be Secretary of State. After all, Powell said "you break it, you own it." Another run at Secretary of State could be Powell's chance to "fix it", at least a little.
So, back to the truth about the NYT with a little rant thrown in. Hey NYT, not only do you not walk on water. You often act like morons. Absolute morons. Don't believe me? Well, here's the proof. You were stupid enough to buy into the Administration's phony made up stories about WMD in Iraq. And don't tell me everybody was fooled. They weren't. McClatchy's wasn't fooled. The UN Weapons Inspector wasn't fooled. The vast majority of other nations in the world which would not go along with us into Iraq like they did in the early 1990s weren't fooled.
And worse of all NYT, you didn't even give it a college try to find the truth - your reporter Judith Miller was doinking one of the Administration's biggest felon lying lips Libby as she published whatever he and the Administration told her. Get real NYT. Wake up. It's obvious, NYT, why you forgive Hillary Clinton for making a gigantic mistake about the war and can't give Obama credit for having the foresight to be against the war from the start. You, NYT, can't come to terms with your own gigantic failure in blindly reporting lies about the war. That and the fact that you are scared of change. Those are the reasons, you self-absorbed, conceited institution.
There is definitely an element of truth to the comments of many posters in this thread. In some ways, the NYT is one of the biggest pieces of doodee that rises to the top of the Democratic Party. (Caveat: while the NYT is a big stupid, conceited piece of turd, Fox News is an even more arrogant, evil turd that intentionally distorts the news to benefit rich people, crazy neocons and their billionaire owner directly at America's expense).
Sorry to get so scatalogical, but you can't describe poo otherwise. Obama is essentially asking the Democratic Party, CAN WE FLUSH ALREADY? All of the posters on this thread are ready to push the knob on the toilet. If the Democrats don't, the Clintons are going to be floating around us for quite a while.
bill mahers so full of shit!he dont even know rudy julieanis offices was in building 7 not the twin towers! what a fuckhead!
This is another reason why people who care should choose Edwards over Hilary or Obama.
Is he perfect? Hell no. But he's the best of the three.
Philip Graham @ 44:
Bingo. Darth Cheney and the 4th Branch have collected dirt on EVERYONE, including their own.
This is Watergate all over again, only bigger and digital.
If it breaks, it will be huge. FISA is the key to whether we get to break it, or not.
I mean, outta all them millions of missing emails from White House servers, you'd think a few would be handy, and damning as all get out. But, House and Senate alike keep talking tough and acting soft.
Oh well. I see the Celtics are winning again. *G*
Duck Soup @ 51:
Worth repeating.
Didn't even read the NIE before making a speech and voting.
GDliberal @ 3:
Leave John Edwards alone! It's not his fault either that he didn't realize till the end of the this speach http://youtube.com/watch?v=HY6BZgkI0kI that he had picked up Dick Cheney's speach by mistake. He's was just a victim of circumstance!
Well, at least he has since apologized for his Iraq war vote which is more than can be said for Hillary.
JTM @ 55:
I know. It's really kind of a "My Pet Goat" realization - Holy s#&!! This person really doesn't belong there.
John @ 53:
Ditto, and
chicano2nd @ 43:
Ditto.
Edwards has my vote on Feb 5.
Chris @ 34:
wishy-washy NEVER does it. You'll have plenty of opportunity to ponder more as corpo-slave under corpo-preznit Shillary or Obama. If we score McInsane, have fun in Iraq, the next One Hundred Years War. Bring some California dates - they don't grow any more in Iraq.
dadams @ 36:
BRAVO dadams !
CappuccettoRosso @ 59:
Someone else suggested that Edwards could be a guest speaker in the Senate against FISA on Monday. That would convince me. It's up to Edwards. I'm looking for real leadership. Not Hope(TM), and sure as HELL NOT Experience screwing us over and lawyering for WAL-MART.
jackp @ 41:
Send it around. MOVE ..Do something. ANYTHING - to support the ONLY candidate with whom we have some chance. Contribute to his campaign. Do phonebanking. Move your own butt. others might follow.
Chris @ 61:
And, what your concerns are re: FISA and two repigs-lite: Shillary and Obama ?
It's their CURRENT JOB and duty to be/fillibuster/VOTE in DC when it happens. That's what they got ELECTED for. That's what they are PAID for. With TAXPAYERS money.
Shillary is from my state. A disaster not any senator. Occupies the slot, sucks out money. ZERO effect for NYorkers.. Got their schedule yet when they speak to it ? What's THEIR LEADERSHIP ABOUT ? I didn't see ANY yet. Frick 'n' Fraq.
Are you an Obama or Shillary's troll polluting this thread ?
fuck it...i dont give a shite anymore
if the wingnuts are ready and willing to hand over to what will be a dem prez, the keys to the kingdom...let them at it
fucking tools
and watch as queen hillary does nixon one better
Dear everyone reading this-
Is the topic still John Edwards? I say give him money and vote for him and maybe we can get an Edwards/Obama ticket and enough progressive freshman in Congress to turn over this fucking fascist, corporate, super-secretive, racist cabal of sadistic, torture-loving, homophobic, war-profiteering, scumbags. The rats (retiring GOP bag-men not blue-blood enough for the Bohemian Grove) are leaving the ship ans we can take the helm if — and this is the big "IF" — we can quit stepping on our own dick and NOT elect someone as self serving as they are.
Consider this y'all. George W Bush deep-sixed all his father's records until we're all dead so that that helped him get appointed President will go to jail. Now do we really want to invite that sort of "cover my family's ass" situation all over again? In 50 years time, between the Bush and the Clintons, Orwell's nightmare of history being rewritten before the bodies are even buried will come true.
It's clear by now that the money of the world wants McCain as President and would love a McCain vs Clinton match-up because that's his best shot for victory. War will continue. Oil will continue. Money will keep matriculating upward. The poor will keep killing each other over cocaine or food or they will drown together as the seas levels rise. The new Capital (Reaganville?) will be on an undisclosed mountain top in Wyoming or Utah or Colorado or Switzerland where the air is still clean up above the ever-more-violent weather and they can drink their filtered snow-melt and Scotch and life will be good and fuck the rest of us.
I've already mailed in my CA vote for Edwards — apparently against the better advice of everyone who has ever been on television.
I’ve already mailed in my CA vote for Edwards — apparently against the better advice of everyone who has ever been on television.
Now that Dennis is gone, I'm leaning in that direction also. But Edwards favors capital punishment. That is irksome. He voted for the Patriot Act (as did almost everyone else). He refuses to stand up for same-sex marriage. Very bad. Clearly, he has not achieved full enlightenment.
Since this appears to be an elections thread instead of FISA, I responded to and added some info I found to the thread below, in the hopes of actually catching up in analyzing what is happening.
Disaffiliated (and marginally affiliated) leftists want to treat the elections as if they are a litmus test, as they do to everything. You can be their hero one day, and their enemy the next -- they have their rhetoric so highly-strung that there is no room for any political facts.
Meanwhile, they ignore the Republicans, ignore the R electorate, and act like every encounter with a businessman is to be treated like a meeting of the Jacobin club, no exceptions. And consequently they can't elect anybody, but nobody can meet the rhetorical stringency.
Assume Nader became president. If he didn't come out of a meeting with business leaders without a bloody severed head to hold high, he would be the target of every shit-flinging chimp who ever supported him. It's an impossible "BLAME SOMEBODY ELSE AND DO NOTHING" strategy that has never failed them yet.
Leave John Edwards alone! It’s not his fault either that he didn’t realize till the end of the this speach http://youtube.com/watch?v=HY6BZgkI0kI that he had picked up Dick Cheney’s speach by mistake. He’s was just a victim of circumstance!
Holy shit! Thank you.
51 Duck Soup,
Nice takedown of Hillary in support of Obama.
BTW, Obama-the guy "running on a platform to change American politics" ought to get himself back in DC on Monday to wrest back the country from lobbyists and give it back to the American people.
If not, I contend all his talk about his "platform to change American politics" is nothing but a campaign slogan.
The corporate controlled media is squelching John Edwards. He is by far the most knowledgeable candidate on the issues and offers the best solutions. He's been setting the plate on all of the important issues all along and was the first to come out with detailed plans on most of them. Real change will only come to us when the corporate special interests get their power and influence revoked. John Edwards is the only candidate of the three that does not accept special interest money. If you actually think that America is going to get the kind of change it needs with Clinton or Obama, you're only kidding yourself. The corporate-controlled media is afraid of John Edwards. Why do they contribute to more to Hillary than any other candidate? They know that their best chance to keep a republican in the White house is for Hillary to be the nominee. If she does beat the republican and become president, they know that she'll reward them for their support. Corporate America wins either way. If you can't clearly see that corporate America is driving and controlling this election, you're not paying attention! Edwards! Edwards! Edwards!
DXWOODS @ 65:
So VERY well said !!
CalGeorge @ 66:
Full enlightenment? Again, the choices we have are not between Perfect Candidate and HRC, BO and John Edwards. It's between a man that is standing up for the little guy (all of us Democrats and even Democrats that think that perfect person is also running and damn all the other ones running) and talking about taking power away from Corporations by force. As JE says, you can't nice these people to death, you must force them to give up power. So instead of living in an apartment and wishing for the perfect gift of a pony, grow up, look at the people actually running and realize that Edwards '08 is the best choice for the U.S. Believe me, I support same sex marriage and all the progressive ideals, but just like the root of the word progressive, it will take progress. America can't be changed from its current mindset at the drop of a hat. Good lord there are still people mad about the Civil War, so civil unions are going to take a while for the country to wrap its collective mind around. Slow and steady progress forward is still progress forward. Edwards '08
I thought this thread was about FISA but it seems to have degenerated into the kind of sqaballing we see at the debates. It seems all the remaining candidates say they would (if they could) vote against immunity. So fine, but that is not the real problem. It is the underlying bill, which continues the star chamber national security state. FISA is unconstitutional and the only candidate, now that DK is out, who seems to understand this is Ron Paul. Poor America!
Fritz @ 70:
Thanks for saying all of that so I didn't have to. Come on people!
Edwards 08 - The candidate of the people.
Sara @ 58:
jon @ 47:
Here's the info, again:
Tomorrow, Saturday, January 26, is primary day in South Carolina. With just less than 24 hours left, we need to make the final outreach push happen.
John is well positioned for a SECOND spot in SC (Rasputin's post #119) - HELP it happen !
It IS a horse race ! Tomorrow THEY’RE OFF!!!
If you can make phone calls into South Carolina, urging folks to get out and vote on Saturday for John, please make those calls NOW. This is the time when a call urging someone to vote for John Edwards can have a powerful and positive impact.
The online phonebanking tool allows you to work at your own pace, once you are verified/ cleared by the campaign (within an hour). You can register here to do the phonebanking from YOUR HOME.
http://www.johnedwardsphonebank.com/
The calls are made only between 10 am - 9 pm EST. The system provides you with a simple script, and ONE phone number at a time - you fill in simple info after completing the call.
For those of you who live within driving distance of South Carolina, Edwards campaign can use your help on primary day -- Saturday, January 26.To find one of Edwards' South Carolina offices close to your home where your assistance can be used, please click here:
http://www.johnedwards.com/sc/offices
Every little bit of effort helps over the next 24 hours. We need to get voters to the polls to vote for John on Saturday. Your help can make the difference in bringing about a strong finish for him in this key state.
With outstanding results of January 18 netroots fundraising, if we can raise $360,000 online by January 31 -- 6 days from now -- we will have raised more money for this campaign in one month than in any previous three month period.
We're that close to setting this fundraising record for the campaign. Will you help us get there?
Click here to help us raise $360,000 for JRE
Within this SECURE LINK there is a sublink for AMERICANS living ABROAD. If you wish to have ANY country to come back to/visit, support John Edwards, the only candidate that LEADS.
Edwards is NOT a corpowhore as other candidates. All through January, you and thousands of others have made contributions to Edwards campaign -- more than half of you for the first time. Your support has allowed to put resources into South Carolina where John Edwards is going to win delegates. And your contributions have helped us get John's message out in key states that will go to the polls on February 5.
Raising $360,000 by January 31 is not only about setting a new campaign record. Most importantly, it will give us the opportunity to get into the next round of key states and buy time to broadcast spots, purchase newspaper advertisements, expand our door-to-door canvassing efforts and get phone banks up-and-running.
Please take upon the challenge to help bring in $360,000 online for John Edwards over the next 6 days !! It is your generosity that has sustained John and his campaign.
John Edwards is counting on US.
Thanks for your support!
.
KongreSS toll FREE numbers:
from justabill 1-800-Capitol-Switchboard
1-800-965-4701
Toll-free numbers for Congress
1