Crooks and Liars in your InBox

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Search

Categories

Syndication

John Amato’s virtual online magazine…OK, It’s a blog!




Tom Delay: Licking his lips and buggin’ on John McCain

Tom Delay looked very shaky with Neil Cavuto yesterday afternoon as he slammed John McCain during the CPAC convention. He licked his lips and tore his politics apart saying that McCain flooded his supporters into the room so that he wouldn’t get booed when he gave his big speech. Here’s the play. The conservatives have made it quite apparent that they are willing to concede the the’08 election, (Ingraham said the same thing to O’Reilly) make believe they are re-grouping and after two years work on 2012.

video_wmv Download | Play video_wmv Download | Play

Bush and company have wounded their movement so severely that the Delay’s and the Man on Dog Santorum’s are cutting ties with them to try and become a viable option again. of course they supported his ever move, but they figure the media will turn a blind eye to that as the years go by.

George Macaca Allen was there too and you know that he would have been the Christian conservative of choice to run for president, but he had “that moment” which ended it for him and left a field so bad that Limbaugh was forced to root for Romney once McCain made his move. I was talking to Digby today and she told me that conservatives did the same thing with Bob Dole and they will do it now.

Do you get the feeling that the conservatives are gaming this thing? I knew that you would.

They know they are going to lose. They will blame the loss on the fact that McCain wasn’t a real conservative (just like Bush.) They know when to fall back and regroup. They’re already playing for the next election.

Everybody sing: Conservatism can never fail, it can only be failed.




No Trackbacks To “Tom Delay: Licking his lips and buggin’ on John McCain“

123 Responses for “Tom Delay: Licking his lips and buggin’ on John McCain”
1
Truth B Told Says:

Willie Nelson had a public announcement a couple of days ago. Something about 9-11.

2
Lollimom Says:

Delay is a common criminal. Nothing he has to say is of interest to me.

The ‘cons have no intention of taking the White House this year. They made the bed, and they want the dems to lie in it.

Obscene filth…that is what the GOP is.

3
slammin’ sammy Says:

hate to break this to you, but if the dems go with Hillary, McCain is going to win. Hillary is Kerry 2008. If she is the Annointed One by the dem Establishment, better get used to the sound of President McCain.

4
ConcernedCanuck Says:

Where are these criminals going to get all their support in the future if they blast their own party? Gonna make a third party? Or do they think an election really isn’t going to change much anyway? Seems odd that they are shooting themselves.

5
Lollimom Says:

slammin’ sammy @ 3:

hate to break this to you, but if the dems go with Hillary, McCain is going to win. Hillary is Kerry 2008. If she is the Annointed One by the dem Establishment, better get used to the sound of President McCain.

Yeah, right. 8 years of killing our economy and hundreds of thousands of people, and you think ANY ‘con has a chance.

Live the delusion.

6
Otay Says:

The Repubs would say this about any one of the 3 remaining candidates winning. The problem is their party has fragmented into the warmongerers (McCain) versus the religious-right loons (Huckabee) versus big corporations (Romney).

But they are just venting that they cant have all three qualities in a candidate this year. When push comes to shove, they will vote for any one of these Repubs over any Dem any day. And may well win.

7
Otay Says:

Doesn’t Delay have some cockroaches to exterminate? From a prison cell?

8
jack damage Says:

Bailin on 08??? Funny, I been thinkin the same thing… That’s why they ain’t really fightin the McCain thing all that hard I don’t think.. They’re willing to finally let him out of the backyard this cycle to shut him up..They don’t really expect him to win.. Then they’ll blame all the crap Bush has set up which will come to pass during the next four years on the Dems…. Even though the Dem prez will be spending the bulk of his/her administration on fixing seven plus years worth of Bush’s fuckups…Not like they ain’t done this before in one form or another when their shit has finally cought up to them and the public has temporarily awoken from its usual media induced saturation overload…..

They are banking on the American populations tried and true ability to slip back into its amnesiac coma within two or three years…. That’s why the Meccacas and the man on dog types are beginning to troll around testing the waters…. Think they won’t try to claim black is white and up is down again in 10 or 11???

Stay tuned folks, get ready for the mother of all political party propaganda reclamation projects to get underway even before the next president, whomever he or she is takes office………JD

9
MargeAggedon Says:

The media repeats whatever their conservodroid masters tell them to. People believe what they want to believe and considering how easily they made half of the US believe that Obama is a radical muslim in sheep’s clothing I’d say these scum bag losers are probably correct in guessing that they can come back in a couple of years and pretend like nothing ever happened.
Unless something drastically changes between now and then.

I’m not holding my breath.

10
MargeAggedon Says:

Otay @ 7:

Doesn’t Delay have some cockroaches to exterminate? From a prison cell?

I suspect he’s already paid in full for his pardon should he need one.

11
slammin’ sammy Says:

Lollimom @ 5:

slammin’ sammy @ 3:

hate to break this to you, but if the dems go with Hillary, McCain is going to win. Hillary is Kerry 2008. If she is the Annointed One by the dem Establishment, better get used to the sound of President McCain.

Yeah, right. 8 years of killing our economy and hundreds of thousands of people, and you think ANY ‘con has a chance.

Live the delusion.

Oh that’s right, I forgot. Hillary voted against the war all along. Not. She then voted to cut off funding the war, so your hundreds of thousands of people would not needlessly die. Not. She was also a strenuous opponent of Kyl/Lieberman. Not. She has also been at the forefront in publicly denouncing Bush’s illegal expansion of executive branch powers. Not.

Who’s living the delusion?

12
Blaed Says:

thanks c&l, now I need to find something to wash out that horrid image image of…*shudder*…tom delay’s tongue.

13
Concerned American Says:

Wow, how the botox has worn off Delay’s face!

14
lilorphant Says:

Well, whatever happens in November, we need to keep up keeping up, and make conservatism irrelevant for the forever future. Hopefully the Rapture will kick in and we won’t have to worry about them.

15
Thing Fish Says:

slammin’ sammy @ 11:

Lollimom @ 5:

slammin’ sammy @ 3:

hate to break this to you, but if the dems go with Hillary, McCain is going to win. Hillary is Kerry 2008. If she is the Annointed One by the dem Establishment, better get used to the sound of President McCain.

Yeah, right. 8 years of killing our economy and hundreds of thousands of people, and you think ANY ‘con has a chance.

Live the delusion.

Oh that’s right, I forgot. Hillary voted against the war all along. Not. She then voted to cut off funding the war, so your hundreds of thousands of people would not needlessly die. Not. She was also a strenuous opponent of Kyl/Lieberman. Not. She has also been at the forefront in publicly denouncing Bush’s illegal expansion of executive branch powers. Not.

Who’s living the delusion?

And McCain voted against the war and cut off funding? And absolutely no connection with Lieberman at all. Right?

I think you need to use a different argument why people will vote for McCain over Clinton.

16
Joe O. Says:

I think Mr. Amato is right on the money. The party that was usually in lock step is now so fragmented and become so extreme in its ideological branches that all of its members can not get behind one candidate.

I also think that Cavuto was correct when he mentioned the fact that the Democracts seem to be more passionate and are turning out in larger numbers than the Republicans. This to is telling. Say what you want about Clinton or Obama but I think the Democrats will have a much easier time of rallying support for either nominated candidate than will the Republicans.

17
Freakaloin Says:

slammin’ sammy @ 3:

hate to break this to you, but if the dems go with Hillary, McCain is going to win. Hillary is Kerry 2008. If she is the Annointed One by the dem Establishment, better get used to the sound of President McCain.

actually hillary plays balls with the real power…just like bill did. mccain is a loose cannon. so they will go with hillary…we will see a few domestic policies change to give the appearance of liberalism…very few…nothing meaningful……foreign policy will stay the same…hillary will continue to destroy r freedoms with executives orders here and there….then next president comes along and…

and no obama won’t get nominated…the super delegates will make sure of that…

18
Left&Left Says:

Ignorant, criminally discredited, drunk mother fucker.

19
Lollimom Says:

slammin’ sammy @ 11:

Lollimom @ 5:

slammin’ sammy @ 3:

hate to break this to you, but if the dems go with Hillary, McCain is going to win. Hillary is Kerry 2008. If she is the Annointed One by the dem Establishment, better get used to the sound of President McCain.

Yeah, right. 8 years of killing our economy and hundreds of thousands of people, and you think ANY ‘con has a chance.

Live the delusion.

Oh that’s right, I forgot. Hillary voted against the war all along. Not. She then voted to cut off funding the war, so your hundreds of thousands of people would not needlessly die. Not. She was also a strenuous opponent of Kyl/Lieberman. Not. She has also been at the forefront in publicly denouncing Bush’s illegal expansion of executive branch powers. Not.

Who’s living the delusion?

You are, that’s who. And you should live it silently. Grampa isn’t going to win anything.

20
fdr_democrat Says:

This pretty much says it all:

Lollimom @ 2:

The ‘cons have no intention of taking the White House this year. They made the bed, and they want the dems to lie in it.

21
bruce headrick Says:

I disagree with John on this piece. I think McCain can beat HRC and the polls show this as well. Granted, right wing talk hates McCain but I really think this is a ploy to draw moderates and some unaware Dems to his side. Dems winning in Nov. is no slam dunk and I’m worried as heck!

22
Typhonis Says:

McCain winning was the best thing that could happen to these guys. Even if he wins they’ll still have they’re way and they don’t have to give up any of their positions. If it was Romney this year he would’ve been destroyed in the general and would’ve ended their reign in the party.

23
Dr. Acula Says:

Who gives a f*ck WHAT the bugman thinks? Shouldn’t he be in jail by now anyway???

Hey, how ’bout that Faux News putting a “D-AZ” graphic under McInsane in their coverage of CPAC yesterday? F*cking propagandists.

Maybe when a dem is in the WH, the new FCC director will pull Faux’ license!

24
fwacbar Says:

Tom ‘I just ate a frog like thing, just like Jabba’ DeLay. What a fucking loser he is….

25
Amazonmum Says:

slammin’ sammy @ 3:

hate to break this to you, but if the dems go with Hillary, McCain is going to win. Hillary is Kerry 2008. If she is the Annointed One by the dem Establishment, better get used to the sound of President McCain.

I can’t disagree more. AGAIN, Hillary has my Republican sisters in law vote. And my racist mom’s vote. There is no way they will vote for Obama. Racism runs deeper than sexism. Why do you think Bill Kristol and Coulter say white women are a problem for the republican party. And with the mccain pissing off the border control freaks and the bible thumper crowd those security moms and soccor moms will hand us the white house. Frankly I love both Obama and Hillary. So bite me.

26
Monie Says:

Yeah, what the Doc says…why isn’t this criminal in jail?

27
VietVet8666 Says:

Opinion:

If Hillary gets the nomination in a brokered convention, the rethugs will gain.

If she beats McCain, she’ll spend 4 years dealing with the hopeless mess left by shrub, will be attacked relentlessly from right and left, and will shape up as another failed president.

If she doesn’t beat McCain, the Democratic Party will destroy itself in a drawn out series of defections and internecine battles.

Either way, the rethugs will have a good chance in 2012.

28
fwacbar Says:

One thing I have noticed since Tuesday is that most of the pukes here where I work are mighty quiet lately…

29
John R. Says:

Why do I get the feeling that this whole anti-McCain campaign is just part of the plan? Call me a conspiracy theorist but McCain is no liberal. Not even close. They are doing this to get people to believe that McCain is the anti-Republican, IMO and I’m not buying it. An easy example is Hannity. He was on Giuliani’s team but now somehow McCain is too liberal? Makes no sense. I smell Rove all over this one.

30
Amazonmum Says:

VietVet8666 @ 27:

Opinion:

If Hillary gets the nomination in a brokered convention, the rethugs will gain.

If she beats McCain, she’ll spend 4 years dealing with the hopeless mess left by shrub, will be attacked relentlessly from right and left, and will shape up as another failed president.

If she doesn’t beat McCain, the Democratic Party will destroy itself in a drawn out series of defections and internecine battles.

Either way, the rethugs will have a good chance in 2012.

Not if she runs with Wes Clark.

31
slammin’ sammy Says:

Thing Fish @ 15:

slammin’ sammy @ 11:

Lollimom @ 5:

slammin’ sammy @ 3:

Yeah, right. 8 years of killing our economy and hundreds of thousands of people, and you think ANY ‘con has a chance.

Live the delusion.

Oh that’s right, I forgot. Hillary voted against the war all along. Not. She then voted to cut off funding the war, so your hundreds of thousands of people would not needlessly die. Not. She was also a strenuous opponent of Kyl/Lieberman. Not. She has also been at the forefront in publicly denouncing Bush’s illegal expansion of executive branch powers. Not.

Who’s living the delusion?

And McCain voted against the war and cut off funding? And absolutely no connection with Lieberman at all. Right?

I think you need to use a different argument why people will vote for McCain over Clinton.

my argument is more that McCain will win because many democrats and progressives will not vote for Clinton, and that she will definitely not appeal to independents in the way Obama does. Any dem nominee will need independents, and the majority of them will not vote for her.

she represents the dem Establishment that even with a majority in Congress, continued to fold and kowtow to Bush on every real important issue.

I think she’d make a better president than McCain, but she will not win in November. She truly is the Kerry of 2008.

32
c. atrox Says:

Delay is licking the insecticide off his lips.

33
Mister Anderson Says:

I’m starting to get that impression too that many core Conservatives are ready to forfeit the general election. With all of the turmoil they face, I actually think that would be a pretty good idea being that McCain would set their party as a whole back if he was elected.

But there is one person who could prevent this from happening: Hillary Clinton

They hate her more than they despise John McCain, so if the Democrats nominate her, I see them turning out in record numbers to block her. Even if they can’t stop her, they will at least get a split Congress in order to block anything she tries to do. The Democrats will be foolish not to nominate Obama….damn foolish!!!

34
earl Says:

jack damage @ 8:
…>>>They are banking on the American populations tried and true ability to slip back into its amnesiac coma within two or three years…. That’s why the Meccacas and the man on dog types are beginning to troll around testing the waters…. Think they won’t try to claim black is white and up is down again in 10 or 11???

Stay tuned folks, get ready for the mother of all political party propaganda reclamation projects to get underway even before the next president, whomever he or she is takes office………JD

So sad.
So true.

Do you think they will also try with Jeb (shudder) in ‘12

35
Joe O. Says:

c. atrox @ 32:

Delay is licking the insecticide off his lips.

Could be. On the other hand, it could be that Delay is having a bout of butt kissing withdraw.

36
crazytown Says:

slammin’ sammy @ 3:

hate to break this to you, but if the dems go with Hillary, McCain is going to win. Hillary is Kerry 2008. If she is the Annointed One by the dem Establishment, better get used to the sound of President McCain.

So, so empty.

37
VietVet8666 Says:

Amazonmum @ 30:

VietVet8666 @ 27:

Opinion:

If Hillary gets the nomination in a brokered convention, the rethugs will gain.

If she beats McCain, she’ll spend 4 years dealing with the hopeless mess left by shrub, will be attacked relentlessly from right and left, and will shape up as another failed president.

If she doesn’t beat McCain, the Democratic Party will destroy itself in a drawn out series of defections and internecine battles.

Either way, the rethugs will have a good chance in 2012.

Not if she runs with Wes Clark.

Opnion:

Wes Clark might be a good running mate.

But the public perception would be that Hillary was taking far more advice from Bill than from Wes.

38
ConcernedCanuck Says:

Joe O. @ 16:

I think Mr. Amato is right on the money. The party that was usually in lock step is now so fragmented and become so extreme in its ideological branches that all of its members can not get behind one candidate.

I also think that Cavuto was correct when he mentioned the fact that the Democracts seem to be more passionate and are turning out in larger numbers than the Republicans. This to is telling. Say what you want about Clinton or Obama but I think the Democrats will have a much easier time of rallying support for either nominated candidate than will the Republicans.

Rallying support? It’s all a cycle. Reps for 4-8 years, Dems for 4-8 years. How can they not get support? And from reading all the left/Dem blogs online, it would be more than a bit hypocritical to say the Reps are fractured and fragmented, without realizing just how fragmented and broken the Dem party is. There will be many people vote for Dem, but it will have nothing to do with who the leader is, they just want a change from Rep rule, and there is no alternatives. That’s it in a nutshell. Every nation in the Western world elects conservatives, and then liberals, and then moderates, and then conservatives etc, etc, etc……change is in the air, but it isn’t because everyone supports the Dems. The Harper conservatives in Canada were elected more to kick out the Liberals, than to elect the conservatives. It’s politics baby!

39
xargaw Says:

slammin’ sammy @ 3:

hate to break this to you, but if the dems go with Hillary, McCain is going to win. Hillary is Kerry 2008. If she is the Annointed One by the dem Establishment, better get used to the sound of President McCain.

You are absolutely right. I only hope that in the upcoming primaries people will realize this and vote overwhelmingly for Obama. There seems to be more talk in the media and more evidence in the polls to this effect. Maybe people will recognize this. Hillary will not get the Independent vote, but Obama will. Hillary will not get the young vote, but Obama will. On super Tuesday, Obama even out paced Hillary on the white mail vote. Obama will carry the vast majority of DEMs, whereas, with Hillary, many voters from all stripes will not support her.

40
Ron Says:

bruce headrick @ 21:

I disagree with John on this piece. I think McCain can beat HRC and the polls show this as well. Granted, right wing talk hates McCain but I really think this is a ploy to draw moderates and some unaware Dems to his side. Dems winning in Nov. is no slam dunk and I’m worried as heck!

Look at what the real message is. 2 weeks ago, Rush and Ann started saying that McCain is too liberal. Now a bunch of others are jumping on ship. The real message is that they think McCain will take away independant voters away from the democrats. They are trying to soften his image. Today, Romney got his message to drop out from the right wing establishment. He’s only following orders. I know that you are very smart and will spread this message. Don’t believe anything the right wing establishment says. They are the party of misinformation. Now organizers are telling the sheeple not to boo McCain. The talking points went out early today.

If this is the case then we have to make sure we have a strong majority in the House and Senate.

41
Amazonmum Says:

slammin’ sammy @ 31:

Thing Fish @ 15:

slammin’ sammy @ 11:

Lollimom @ 5:

Oh that’s right, I forgot. Hillary voted against the war all along. Not. She then voted to cut off funding the war, so your hundreds of thousands of people would not needlessly die. Not. She was also a strenuous opponent of Kyl/Lieberman. Not. She has also been at the forefront in publicly denouncing Bush’s illegal expansion of executive branch powers. Not.

Who’s living the delusion?

And McCain voted against the war and cut off funding? And absolutely no connection with Lieberman at all. Right?

I think you need to use a different argument why people will vote for McCain over Clinton.

my argument is more that McCain will win because many democrats and progressives will not vote for Clinton, and that she will definitely not appeal to independents in the way Obama does. Any dem nominee will need independents, and the majority of them will not vote for her.

she represents the dem Establishment that even with a majority in Congress, continued to fold and kowtow to Bush on every real important issue.

I think she’d make a better president than McCain, but she will not win in November. She truly is the Kerry of 2008.

I saw Hillary in Seattle last night. Only 1000 people were expected to show up. When we got there, there were over 5000, standing room only. It was shocking. And ELECTRIC! And there were gays, lesbians, machinists, firefighters, old folks, kids, minorites, males, females, vets, rich, poor, homeless, skateboarders, CEOs. It was an amazing cross section of America. Oh and HOPE, don’t forget HOPE!

42
ConcernedCanuck Says:

Amazonmum @ 41:

slammin’ sammy @ 31:

Thing Fish @ 15:

slammin’ sammy @ 11:

And McCain voted against the war and cut off funding? And absolutely no connection with Lieberman at all. Right?

I think you need to use a different argument why people will vote for McCain over Clinton.

my argument is more that McCain will win because many democrats and progressives will not vote for Clinton, and that she will definitely not appeal to independents in the way Obama does. Any dem nominee will need independents, and the majority of them will not vote for her.

she represents the dem Establishment that even with a majority in Congress, continued to fold and kowtow to Bush on every real important issue.

I think she’d make a better president than McCain, but she will not win in November. She truly is the Kerry of 2008.

I saw Hillary in Seattle last night. Only 1000 people were expected to show up. When we got there, there were over 5000, standing room only. It was shocking. And ELECTRIC! And there were gays, lesbians, machinists, firefighters, old folks, kids, minorites, males, females, vets, rich, poor, homeless, skateboarders, CEOs. It was an amazing cross section of America. Oh and HOPE, don’t forget HOPE!

Well I should hope so. As has been pointed out to me, this is democratic primaries choosing a leader. I would sure hope people from a political party would show up to hear one of their members vying for leadership speak. LOL! It would be amazing and downright embarrassing to hold a speech and nobody from your own party supporting you.