You're Making An Impact--Keep It Going.
By Nicole Belle Tuesday Feb 12, 2008 12:31pmThere's a new rule on Capitol Hill: the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee can remove impeachment from the Constitution, but cannot also use telephones, Email, or fax machines, because the flood of pro-impeachment communications from outraged citizens is overwhelming each of those devices. Don't believe me? Try phoning, Emailing, or faxing John Conyers' office.
Congressman John Conyers' telephone, by many reports, rang endlessly on Monday, approximately 60 times per minute, or as fast as people could get through. The same thing appears to be happening today (Tuesday).
If you try to get through at 202-225-5126, chances are you'll hear a busy signal. Other times it will simply ring forever until a recorded voice tells you "Your party is not answering, please try your call later." Some people have had better luck by calling the Capitol Hill switchboard at 202-224-3121 or through one of the toll-free numbers that activist groups use, and asking to be connected to John Conyers' office. Others have just run into busy signals that way too.
If you are lucky, you will get through to a staffer, and by all reports they are very, very cheerful staffers glad that you called, no matter where in the country you live.
Emailing the Congressman is out, because he has stopped accepting Emails, at least at this address john.conyers@mail.house.gov. I could tell you some of his staff members' Email addresses, but then they wouldn't be able to work for a week.
Faxing the Congressman is very much in, but you have to set your fax machine to repeatedly redial until it gets through. The fax number is 202-225-0072.
You can also try these alternatives. Call Conyers' Judiciary Committee office at 202-225-3951. Or call his Detroit, Mich., office at 313-961-5670 or his Trenton, Mich., office at 734-675-4084.
If you do get through, be prepared to hear that impeachment hearings are not happening, but hearings into impeachable offenses are. Even though these non-impeachment hearings will not make it onto television, and Conyers is not even announcing them ahead of time, and even though witnesses will refuse to show up, Conyers' staffers will try to tell you that hearings of the sort they've done for the past 13 months are all that's needed.
Hmm. If that were true, would the phone be ringing the way it is?

Login or Register to post comments.
I'm finished with congress, especially on this issue.
It is abundantly clear to me that there is something wrong with our government. It is corrupt, it is not acting in the best interests of the electorate, it is not fulfilling its Constitutional duties.
Conyers? A joke. If he doesn't get it by now, then something is very, very wrong, and that's where the focus should be.
I want to know precisely what this man is afraid of. If he is being blackmailed, the he (and all other dems who have "goods" against them) need to step down, get out, and let other, cleaner people take over.
At this point, it is entering the realm of the insulting.
Really Conyers? After 8 years of this cabal, with a major scandal on a weekly basis you still have the stones to ask what needs to be brought up?
Fuck you!
If we ever see impeachment hearings, I'll take a vow of abstinence. And six weeks later, you'll read about me in the Enquirer erupting into flames due to spontaneous combustion.
It is abundantly clear to me that there is something wrong with our government. It is corrupt, it is not acting in the best interests of the electorate, it is not fulfilling its Constitutional duties.
Man, what are we gonna do? This is all so depressing.
We're impacting phone lines? How low can the bar go??
prunes @ 4:
It's what I said: Find out what they're afraid of. Expose it. Force them to get out, and move in CLEAN people who are not wallowing in the filth that this current batch of scumbags seem to be wallowing in.
I'm not depressed.
I'm fucking ANGRY.
I like that idea. Halt the business of congress, until they do the will of the people.
We need to impeach our ENTIRE government!
They're all corrupt, lying sacks of shit! People,
we need to start voting in third party candidates.
Enough of this so-called 'two party' system that
operates as one...against us.
I think at this point we need to forget about impeachment and start on War Crimes prosecution. I don't think there is a statute of limitations, if we lay the groundwork now, and don't let go, eventually we will have a favorable political environment to prosecute.
Strawberrybitch @ 3:
It doesn't take much for a redhead to spontaneously combust...I know..I date one! LOL!
Sorry, couldnt' resist, strawberry! LOL!
John @ 9:
Thats also a very good idea.
Impeach, Indite, convict, imprison, execute!
Also, a lot of it has to do with lobbyists.
They have WAY too much influence over
politicians.
Lollimom @ 1:
I'm not sure but I've heard the phrases "photographic negatives" and "farm animals" bandied about.
i love the activism, it is awesome...
but, in my normal contrarian way, i wonder why scads of calls, emails, faxes and the such is going to change conyers 'do-nothing-about-presidential-crimes' mindset. its not like conyers isn't fully aware of what bush has done, of people's intense passion around this issue. he knows. he has just decided, or been told, to do nothing.
it wreaks of partisanship. instead of doing what is best for america he, and the nancy pelsosis of the world, worry that any action against bush will hurt dems chance in 08. first off, that is a big assumption to make. secondly, hello, this is the REASON we have congresss, as a check on executive power. conyers, until he stops stonewalling, is failing america.
Lollimom @ 1:
Sadly, it's not even blackmail.
Conyers is on cspan as we write. They are on the FISA bill.
Liberal AND Proud @ 10:
No problem, L&P. There IS something inherently messed up with Redheads, our GIVE A F**K Factor knob is permanently stuck at 11.
Please also give Henry a call:
Valerie Plame is talking about Sibel Edmonds
Henry Waxman is grilling a baseball player, Roger Clemens, about steriods while refusing to grill the state department about reported TREASON in the state department (Sibel Edmonds: Reported in London Times)
Please call him and let his office know that you find that “the war on steriods” should take a back seat to investigating TREASON involving the sale of nuclear secrets. Sibel Edmonds, featured on CBS 60 Minutes, names names and is very credible.
http://www.henrywaxman.house.gov/contact.htm
In Washington, D.C.
2204 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515
(202) 225-3976 (phone)
(202) 225-4099 (fax)
In Los Angeles
8436 West Third Street, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90048
(323) 651-1040 (phone)
(818) 878-7400 (phone)
(310) 652-3095 (phone)
Stop the buying this delusion of any "impact".
Nah. Gon. Hah.
If we had a true free press in control of a mass media..
The nightmare of the last 7 years would NEVER have happened.
The US media is complicit in these crimes.
The relationship between the CIA, corporate media and corporate billionaires
..has resulted in the demise.
But the people are fighting back... The crimes of BUSH and CHENEY is NOT an acceptable precedent.
And neither is ANY firm that supplied war materials to Sadaam Hussein.
Or any presidential candidate that served on the board of any of those firms.
Dana @ 8:
You mean you don't "believe" in "hope" and "change"? What kind of racist, war mongering hater are you?
Johnny2Bad @ 21:
I believe in hope and change but I believe that we have to do it. No super heroes . . . just us.
Sounds good. And if you can't get through to Conyer's office, why not call some republican Senator's offices and ask them if they would be kind enough to deliver a message to Conyers, requesting that he hurry up with impeachment proceedings?
Start with McCain, 202.224.2235, or mccain.senate.gov/contact.
Phone calls, emails, faxes to Conyers?
Here's a faster, easier, less-painful way to arrive at the same result:
Jot down on a piece of paper everything Bush has done to merit impeachment.
Carefully fold the paper and place it in your shirt pocket.
Run head-first into the nearest brick wall.
Robert Wexler hit is goal and more... 227,167
http://wexlerwantshearings.com/
Bob Dylan is playing songs relating to the government
and impeachment on his radio show today.
Go Bob(s)
Avid Reader @ 18:
thanks for that avid reader!!!
i am insanely pissed off that something as inconsequential as steroid use in big boy games is MORE important than treason in the congress and in the msm...
why bother reporting this?
don't pop a boner just because the lines are freakin' busy for chrissakes. it doesn't mean you get to fuck Cheney. you, me, all of us are the ones that are going to get fucked again.
pardon my language please.
Relatedly, the House looks like it will actually stand up and play chicken with Bush over FISA/PAA. They will be voting on a 21-day extension (that Bush says he'll veto) in less than an hour. If you've got a Blue Dog in the House, call him or her now. As in, stop reading and start dialing. Maybe mention Donna Edwards, as that could help convince said Blue Dog to sit up, instead of roll over.
Samson- @ 26:
Ask Waxman if he knows about Misprision of Treason
Sibel Edmonds is trying her best to follow the law.
Why isn't he? Did he at least forward her allegations to the appropriate authorities?
If not, why shouldn't HE be charged with misprision of treason?
United States Code, Title 18
Part I - CRIMES
Chapter 115 - TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES
§ 2382. MISPRISION OF TREASON
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.
People keep saying that the dems don't have a backbone - but it's not true - they have a very strong spine and they continue to use it AGAINST the will of the people. There is a frightening article in the SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE no less about the powers this president has and how the gov't , with no-bid contracts, are building prisons all over the country - who are these prisons for?
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/02/04/ED5OUPQJ7.DTL
Why is the gov't buying trains with shackles, undisclosed prisons and the like? Remember - people don't look at Hitler and ask why didn't the German Parliament stop him - they ask why didn't the German people stop him.
Let us not be judged similarly. Writing letters to congress and being "nice" isn't working any more. What are we going to do people?
If we elect a new president, what permanent change in the trajectory of where this country is going can ever happen if the crimes of the Bush regime are not brought out in the public square, exposed, investigated, and justice is done? If the new “progressive” candidate promises change in areas of health care, the economy, and tax breaks, all of which may prove beneficial to the average American temporarily, what REAL and LASTING change will occur in this country and the world as the U.S. Government continues the same program: bombing Iraq, bombing Pakistan, goes on to bomb Iran, continues to spy on Americans, New Orleans remains a disaster area, detainees continue to be tortured, and the whole program set in place by the Bush regime is solidified and made permanent? It is critical to fully understand that without an absolute repudiation of the crimes of the Bush regime that the program and agenda of the last thirty years of influence by neo-con, corporatist, theocratic, and war mongering elitists these groups will continue to have over-reaching power in this country.
I got through no problem. Left a cordial message encouraging Conyers to do his job. But really...if he doesn't get by now he's an imbecile; otherwise, he's just putting up a facade for "his base".
I left a message saying that if he doesn't start impeachment proceedings by December, it's only fair that he be the one, and the only one, to stay in Washington over Christmas break.
I'm sure Conyers telecom buddies have put in all the unlisted phone lines that he and his cronies in Congress need.
I mean...we can't have the "work of the privileg...oops, I mean people" disrupted by such nonsense as grassroots issues raised by the great unwashed.
Petro @ 15:
I can tell you right now: He's lying. Everything in his body language, and his condescending remarks tell me he's lying.
That man needs to go.
Thanks for the clip. Very telling.
I called Representative Conyers off @202-225-5126 this afternoon and yesterday afternoon to let him and them know my opposition to granting immunity to the telecom companies and in favor of impeachment of both the President and vice-President. I had no problem talking to a member of his staff. It seems that they are getting many, many calls in favor of impeachment and against immunity. In regard to immunity I do not understand why we are giving immunity. It goes against our Constitution, in particular Article I, Section 9 section 3 No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed. Also mentioned again in Section 10. We Democrats must fight for our liberal/progressive principals. We must fight for the platform of the modern Democratic Party.
"..if we started an impeachment hearing that didn't succeed...they would say that [Cheney? Bush?] is being demonized...they would take that right into the election of 2008..."
So he got elected in order to ...? .... stay elected?
Useless hack.
below is my fax...before I sent it and comments?
Thanks
As a tax payer, I am ashamed at the behavior my elected officials have displayed regarding Impeachment hearings with this administration. If you take history in to account, and with in the last century has shown, Impeachment is the PEOPLES only form of holding elective officials accountable and not just wait until another election year turns the corner.
If what has been placed in your committee’s plate does not display all the signs of impeachment and allow the people to not be heard, what is YOUR version on what IS an Impeachable offense? Between the open statements of lies and signing statements; to the cover up’s in the emails to the politicization of government agencies to the justice department firings and so many more we don’t know…, what is Impeachment?
Congressman Conyers, for future generations to have elected officials that displace behavior that may fall under the Articles of Impeachment Clause with out being checked will only show that if one is having a marital affair THAT IS AN IMPEACHABLE act, and not covering up lies, politicization and taking one into a war based on deceptions.
You being the Chairman and an elective official will not be around when history writes that under your leadership that people’s house turned a blind eye to defend the United States Constitution.
Lollimom @ 34:
My pleasure. I appreciate your take on it...
lock them all up today and arrange a fair trial. the charge: unamerican activities.
I got through on both numbers though it took awhile. They were kinda defensive. Didn''t want to take a position either way and then put me through to a comment line.
The corporations and the billioinaires are closing ranks and pushing us toward facism. No one stood to oppose Hitler, thus far no one will oppose this movement either. I'm not sure what to do.
So I called and got right through - I told the Gentleman that answered the phone why I was calling and he said please hold and transferred me to a comment line. I commented and that was nice.
Impeach President Bush Congressman Conyers it's time to get it back on the table - If you don't as a matter of law and justice this country will never regain the integrity we once held.
John @ 9:
Exactly. Then he can't pardon himself either. Yay!!
Ladies and Gentlemen,
If you want something done on impeachment, trust me, call your OWN Member of Congress and Senator, especially those who sit on the Judiciary Committee. Rep. Conyers, etal is not going to pay attention to people who are not from his/her district or even from his state. Sorry, but that is the reality.
And, many of you are complaining about the backbone of the Democrats -- where is the backbone of the electorate?? There is NO WAY that this country is willing or ready for another impeachment travesty. So, please move on and vote in November -- not just for the President but for you city, local, state and federal officials.
They may be able to ignore emails and faxes and calls.... but they couldn't ignore 30,000 people marching up the hill to demand impeachment from the guy.
We need to start a People's Resolution to Impeach Congress and we need to deliver it to every Congressman, news outlet, blog and house hold. The only way you're going to get these people to listen to you is if you slap them in the face with a codfish. They're not listening because they're more afraid of George W. Bush than they are of us. Perhaps rightfully so, since all we can do is get irritated and note vote for them whereas George W. Bush can have them all declared terrorists and have them shipped off to a CIA black sight to be tortured.
We put them in office and they know that our only other choice is Republicans and they know we're not going to vote that way. So they think they have an easy win on their hands. The only way to get them to do their damned jobs is to make them realize you'll vote 3rd party before you vote for them if they're just going to sit there and let the nation burn.
"Your party is not answering"
INDEED.
Wow --- your "Leaders" in action.
Battered spouse syndrome at its finest here folks.
Maria @ 43:
We're not talking about impeaching somebody because they got a blow job and lied about it. THAT was an impeachment travesty. We're talking about a President who ignores Congress, lies to Congress and the American people, kidnaps and tortures people, wipes his butt with the Constitution, willfully and knowingly breaks the law and orders others to do it too.
If there were EVER a reason for impeachment, George W. Bush is it.
If you think lying to Congress about an affair is on par with lying to them about your justification for a war that's killed almost a million innocent people and spent over half a trillion dollars then there's something seriously fucking wrong with you.
E in Md @ 47:
I'm not comparing Bush's America to Nazi Germany but I fear that history will. We must stop the bleeding now! Our republic is in the ICU barely hanging on.
People's lack of appetite for the truth is truly stunning.
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0911-28.htm
Ed in MD -- you're right we are not talking about a blow job, but there is NO WAY we are going to impeach Bush. What I am trying to get across is that you are wasting your time being angry at Rep. Conyers, etal. Trust me, he wants to impeach Bush, but he does not have the support of Congress. Please remember that the Democrats have a pretty good majority in the House, but the Democrats in the Senate do not. You can't get a toilet paper bill passed in the Senate without 60 votes!! That is why is if you want to accomplish something and make a statement, vote in November and make the United States Senate Democratic majority more solid.
Do you really honestly think that this country is ready for another impeachment?? No.
I always hear, we need to do this, we need to do that, but I never see anyone actually DO anything. There are so many like-minded people out there who would be a powerful force if only one person would come up with a plan and get it started.
Where I live a small group of us are fighting corruption on the local level and making a difference. No one up till now has bothered and local officials have been doing as they please. We have them shaking over possible (upcoming but they don't know yet) investigations and all of a sudden they are doing their jobs properly. Gotta start somewhere, and I don't plan on stopping here. If 5 people can shake up a local government, it can infect all the way up with the numbers we have willing and wanting to see change in this country.
Spoke to a Conyers staffer for about 16 minutes. He said impeachment would never happen. Not a chance. Due to lack of time, lack of support (Lieberman and friends) and lack of resources. They are severely out lawyered by the Whitehouse. Conyers is a stickler to due process. Which is much slower than the speed of crime. Said that Bush may fall in the legal system post presidency than firmed that there was no way that would ever happen either.
We discussed some of the woes and challenges in picking up many, many moderate republicans. He also confirmed the office outage from the flood of impeachment voices. Says their work is being severely hampered as a result.
They seem to recognize the “Undermining of every agency” by Bush Inc. Though says Conyers is going to use the AG scandal route to go after Bush’s misdeeds. Touted the resignation of several Justice Dept. officials. This Conyers staffer was polite, open and very sure of himself. I hope I get him again tomorrow. Again, he said no impeachment.
With respect and kindness to all.
Maria @ 51:
ummm, yes... i do.
but, really, that is a bad way to view this issue. does that really matter what people are ready for? impeachment needs to happen when the president uses his office to the detriment of the country and the constitution. it has nothing to do to with polls, or public opinion. laws were broken, and people must be held accountable.
the notion that our goal should be to increase the democratic majority in congress instead of holding people accountable for their heinous crimes smacks of petty partisanship and is just another reason why many refuse to join the democratic party.
put the country first, not the party.
Ladies & Gentlemen
Please move along now there is nothing more to see here.
Over the last 4 years all the screams to Impeach these criminals has not been heard nor will they ever heard by this congress.
Phone calls..blah blah blah. Faxes..blah blah blah. E-mail..blah blah blah. After doing all this I have to ask. Has your voice be heard?
Most would answer no. For Christ sake they want you to e-mail them they want you to call there offices because they can simply ingnore the message.
But:
300,000 folks marching on Washington DC screaming IMPEACH BUSH would do the job and quite nicley I might add.
They can not and will not ingnore that.
So what are you going to do?
Yes. By all means. Call, write, email Conyers. The same with Clinton. Feinstein. Pelosi. etc. etc.
It won't do a damn thing.
The Democrat political establishment has determined that impeachment by the voters is the only impeachment they'll accept.
George Bush could murder someone on videotape and the Democrats would tell you "it isn't in the people's interests" to pursue a criminal sanction against Der President.
>Impeachment needs to happen when the president uses his office to the detriment of the country and the constitution. it has nothing to do to with polls, or public opinion. laws were broken, and people must be held accountable.
Thank you!
There is another VERY important reason --- to the rest of the world, and for future generations, not impeaching is tacit approval of everything these
weasels have done.
After being a lifelong Liberal Democrat, I am now a complete cynic in regard to anything of substance being done by the Party to reel in the current criminal Administration. I will still vote Democrat in the election because I know the Republicans are far worse liars, criminals, and sociopaths. There is no hope for real change until the Democratic Party is purged of RINOs, the DLC Bluedog pack of corporate whores. Do not waste time debating their defenders on this board or anywhere else. They are immune to reality and facts, and feeding the trolls only encourages them.
Squash them in the next round of Democratic primaries.
robbie @ 56:
He already has. Many many times over.
... and:
If Impeachment proceedings are not done advanced this year, the entire section on Impeachment should be removed from the Constitution.
Hey! What about Pelosi's fax, phone & emails? And Emanuel... and all the "Blue Dregs" who vote Repug?
Maria @ 51:
Yes, as a matter of fact I do and I believe that it is in fact the sworn duty of Congress to impeach him.
And if the Democrats had any guts what so ever they'd take that slim majority and cram it down the Republicans throats. The Republicans are able to pulls off the shit they pull off because they stick together. They threaten a filibuster and the Dems cower and back off. They call the Dems soft on terror and the Dems go hide under their beds. The most recent example would be the FISA bill. The right thing to do would have been to strip any immunity provisions from the Bill. Yet the amendment still failed with quite a few Dems voting to kill it.
They need to decide who they serve. If they do indeed serve us, then they need to get on their feet and start cleaning house. No more of this bullshit looking into steroids in baseball. Start filing subpoenas for Bushies and if they don't show up go send someone to arrest them at their houses or jobs. And if Mukasey and his lackies won't do it, then start first with a special prosecutor and put Mukasey on trial...
and if any of this doesn't work, filibuster and vote down every bill that comes through Congress that Republicans want. Vote down every amendment and earmark. Paralyze the government.
All they need to do in order to do this is stick together and start leaning on the RINOS instead of cowering every time someone says 'Boo'
They work for US, not George W. Bush and not the Republicans in the Senate, not Blackwater and not the telecoms, and the only reason they still have their cushy Congressional seats is because WE put them there.
hug the moon @ 53:
If that's the case then we might as well remove the impeachment provisions from the Constitution with an amendment and have Congress officially declare that the President is completely and in every way immune to the law and that he is in fact the supreme law of the land and then just disband the Congress entirely
If we're going to turn America into a fascist dictatorship with that fucking reject Bush at the helm then we might as well just do it. Because if we're too damned cowardly to fight for our rights and freedoms then we don't deserve to have them.
All Hail Emperor Bush!
Samson- @ 54:
Samson- @ 54:
put the country first, not the party.
Here here!
Checkur6 @ 55:
Yeah that's what I'm talking about.
I called and spoke with a human after 100 rings
E in Md @ 65:
Do these 300,000 carry pitchforks and torches? 150,000 US troops can not take Baghdad, with the ull mite of the US military and most of our tax dollars behind them. How will 300,000 people holding spray painted bedsheets going to take out the establishment? At least it will serve as an historical marker.
Maybe a national strike would be better.
WHAT FREAKING DIFFERENCE WILL IT MAKE? Bush is in office less than another year, time enough to do whatever damage he wants. Even if he is impeached, he can stall around long enough to finish his term and light out for the Paraguay Ranch. The impeachment is about 6 years overdue. At this point, Bush & Co. simply do not give a damn. Martial law can still be declared. The Halliburton-built prison camps are in-place. (They Exist! Check on it!) Face it...we're stuck with this asshole until January. And if we are really lucky, Obama will manage to get a few good things accomplished before he is either hamstrung by some manufactured "scandal" like the Lewinsky Affair, or until the dirtbags who are REALLY running this country, the Cheneys and Scaifes and their ilk, arrange for some Iranian Nutcase to assasinate him so they can go on with their war profiteering. .
Make that an International strike.
Again, I am only saying maybe. I do not pretend to have an answer.
I know being negative won't help, but, this CONgress has known this crap for almost 8 years. They haven't done ANYTHING up to now, and they won't. Before the Iraq invasion, millions and millions the world over marched in protest. Did that work? Nope.
hug the moon @ 69:
An international strike? European nations have national strikes fairly often, why would they need to have to help Americans get their shit together?
hug the moon @ 67:
Maybe.
If one looks at the history of the United States the only time in its history that changes,real changes have been made was when the people protested. I look back at the Vietnam War protest and if it weren`t for those we would still be fighting that war also.
There is strength in numbers. Look at our congress today that proves the point.
Tyler Durden @ 71:
Good point. Still the more the merrier. Maybe we can get Paraguay to join in. A national strike then. When? Is anybody out there?
> WHAT FREAKING DIFFERENCE WILL IT MAKE?
Because it's not about removing Bush or Cheney from office. Have NO illusion: an impeachment investigation will result in NO charges and even if it does a trial will result in acquittal.
Full stop.
I support impeachment not because it will have the effect of removing Bush from office. Nor I do I support it because I think it will advantage or disadvantage either political party.
I support it because I consider it to be constitutionally mandated. It is illegal, as far as I'm concerned, not to pursue an investigation wherever it leads when this much evidence of wrongdoing is lying thick on the ground.
You find a dead body in the Oval Office, you conduct an investigation. It does not matter if the president is popular and has so much congressional support that you can never hope to effectively prosecute him for murder. You investigate anyway and let history judge those who would acquit in full light of the facts and not based on spinuendo.
I also support an investigation because choosing not to investigate gives tacit and direct approval of the manner in which Bush and Cheney have conducted themselves. It says that the only disagreement between the administration and the congress is on matters of the politics of foreign and domestic policy. It says that there is no credible evidence of any real wrongdoing on anyone's part.
And it gives full permission to the next president...and the president after that...and the president after that...to do everything Bush has done. If they ever get called on it, they can say 'hey, you didn't even bother to investigate BUSH for this stuff...why am I so special?'
We owe it to history and to what integrity of good government we have left. Counting votes and dissecting internal party dynamics have no place in this conversation. That's what the regular order of business is for.
LOL
Ever noticed when there is talk of really doing something the room becomes empty.
ConcernedCanuck @ 70:
so true.
i live in philly and we had tens of thousands of peeps walking down market st and around independence mall protesting the notion of illegally invading iraq. the result: nothing. unless you were in center city when this was going down you heard nothing of it.
and, imho, the biggest reason why these protests and marches were so ineffective was due to the fact the msm barely covered them, if at all. what happens when millions of people come together to try to make a statement and the media, which supposedly (don't laugh) is supposed to cover the news, ignores and belittles a mass movement?
the corporate owned and controlled msm wanted this travesty. they needed this crime. and no matter how many people came together they wouldn't give honest coverage of the popular will.
now, does that mean we shouldn't protest, be activists, speak out, demand change, etc.? no, it does not. but we shouldn't fool ourselves thinking that the corporate establishment is going to willingly let our voices be heard.
Two words: Police. State.
Whether we impeach the bastards is not the point . . it is the process of impeachment that will bring the sewage into the sunlight.
There are plans to turn this country into more of a police state than it already is. We have to start pushing back. We have to put our bodies between the criminals and the constitution of the United States of America.
My country, 'tis of Thee,
Sweet Land of Liberty
Of thee I sing;
Land where my fathers died,
Land of the pilgrims' pride,
From every mountain side
Let Freedom ring.
I have a question:
Does impeachment really have to come from congress? Or is there anything that citizens can do to get it started? In my native country any citizen can file for impeachment, just as long as they can find one Representative to endorse it. What are the laws about this in the US?
reyvn @ 79:
In this country it comes from Congress. If it comes from the citizenry it's called a coup or revolution and Bush has already covered his ass on that with the Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007
reyvn @ 79:
Its been tried and apparently noth