Iraq Intelligence Report Phase 2: Bush Administration Lied About Pre-Invasion Intelligence
By Logan Murphy Wednesday Jun 04, 2008 9:15pm
Download | play
Download | play (h/t Heather)
Jon Perr at Perrspectives breaks it down:
Four years after Kansas Senator Pat Roberts triumphantly cleared the Bush administration of misusing pre-war Iraq intelligence, the Phase 2 report of the Senate Intelligence Committee he once chaired today reached a much different conclusion. After Roberts successfully stonewalled past the 2004 and 2006 elections the studies examining White House statements on the Iraqi threat and the role of the Pentagon's Office of Special Plans, his successor Jay Rockefeller today concluded:
"The president and his advisers undertook a relentless public campaign in the aftermath of the attacks to use the war against Al Qaeda as a justification for overthrowing Saddam Hussein."
While Democratic and Republican committee members battle it out over the implications of the Phase 2 report, Pat Roberts' role in obstructing the investigation of the Bush administration's uses - and misuses - of intelligence in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq is beyond dispute. Read on...
The world knew the Bush administration was lying all along, but it's good to finally have a definitive record. Senator Pat "Memory Pills" Roberts did his level best to run interference for George Bush and unfortunately for him, he hitched his wagon to a falling star. Roberts was considered vulnerable in his home state of Kansas before the release of this report, and in a year of change and the demise of the GOP, this isn't going to help. This doesn't bode well for Senator John McCain either. He's staked his whole candidacy on the failed Iraq debacle and he, along with the rest of the Republican candidates, will find it difficult to separate themselves from the disaster they helped to create.

Login or Register to post comments.
ah, it's so nice to see fellow dems get off the slam Hillary Clinton bandwagon and get back to bashing Bush the war criminal, geezuz keerist on crutches
Second Intelligence missing an "N" in title
[Thanks. I let the spelling correctors know-Sitemonitor]
i wish the other half would pay attention.......i'm talking republicians
Oil, contracts for Haliburton and other cronies. ...maybe they won't notice.
McCain continues to repeat Bush lies. There is no difference between Bush and McCain.
Nobody died when Clinton lied.
Impeach.
Indict.
Imprision.
Cage the chimp.
The first and second charges of the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials were these:
BushCo committed aggressive war.
Bush must stand trial.
OK, Pelosi, can we impeach him NOW????? Jesus Christ, Congress, just how much more must this guy get away with before you get some balls and fulfill your DUTY???
Look . . . we KNOW the fuckers lied. We've known it for YEARS. We know they continue to lie. But what is the real crime here? The real crime is that the Democrats do absolutely NOTHING about it. There are just some times when people do something so bad that you have to stand up regardless of the consequences. this is one of those times and all pelosi did was crawl under the table. The Dems are worse for letting this go on and on and on and on and on. The are accessories after the fact . . . and in law that makes you just as guilty as the principle
Unbelieveable that these criminals will get off scott free and that there will be NO accountability , if this was any other country but the high and mighty USA Bush and company would be facing execution and rightly so .
[Deleted. Off topic-Sitemonitor]
I'll catch news about this from the unbiased PBS - McNeill/Lehrer Report where they honestly report the news
[It hasn't been 'McNeil/Lehrer' since 1995, when Robin (Robert) McNeil left the show. I guess you don't get a chance to watch that often-Sitemonitor]
No Way! Get the Fuck OUT! I'm Shocked! SHOCKED!!! I tell ya. I never saw THAT one coming.
Shit. If you can't trust your government, who can you trust.
Would somebody please give this man a blowjob so he can be impeached?
Can Pat Roberts be indicted for obstruction of justice? Maybe throw him in the jail in the basement of Congress to keep KKKarl Rove company?
I'm currently reading Vincent Bugliosi's new book. His case for trying Bushco for murder and war crimes is very compelling. I shope Keith has Bugliosi as a guest soon.
Matt in Texas @ 9:
i'm with you more than you know........but let's get a democrat in office and watch for more confessions to come out
Surprise, Surprise, Surprise
Hey Pelosi, that's a nice bowl of peaches you put on the table but that's not what we're demanding.
Bush was lying during he 2000 debates.
L.A. Confidential @ 20:
"I'm going to have a humble foreign policy"
Right!
Thank you for publishing this. The story has gone virtually unnoticed or unreported in the media. Bush is caught outright lying and it is just another day.
L.A. Confidential @ 21:
It was these same debates Bush said "his would not be a nation building administration" and that he was "going to bring dignity and integrity back to the oval office".
The only thing he brought was debt, deception, death and destruction.
this makes iraq look like mass murder.
wasnt Ron Paul the lone voice that voted against the war , just saying .
L.A. Confidential @ 21:
It's good to know that, after all this divisive Clinton/Obama mishigas, we can still all get together and hate us some Bush! :)
First unprovoked war? I guess the Gulf of Tonkin incident really never happened after all.
I hope that Pat Roberts gets a challenger soon...
David N @ 25:
156 congressmen and 23 senators voted against the war, but thanks for playing.
It's great to see this stuff coming out now. Perfect timing ... makes me very hopeful. Keep peeling back the layers of this mouldy onion and maybe we'll reach the rotten core just before people cast their ballots.
slightly o.t., but the guy you want handling the monumental task of going after these scumbags as attorney general isn't john edwards, it's pat fitzgerald. remember, an a.g. needs to be a sharp prosecutor, and fitz is the only man alive to get a conviction vs. a bush crony.
edwards ought to be vp.
The Repubs are so bankrupt! Why on earth should anyone in their right mind vote for them. And there aren't enough CEOs to win them any elections. Frankly anyone complicit with this outrage should be forced from ever holding any office again. They they should spend the rest of their lives paying penance to the brave young men and women who lost their lives and were mutilated by their mistake and subsequent cover-up.
It'll be interesting to see which one of the Bush criminals is next to jump ship and tell all. Pretty soon Georgie won't have anyone left to catapault the propaganda for war on Iran.
In 2009, Bush is going to come out with a book explaining that his presidency was an elaborate piece of conceptual art.
SO impeachment is off the table, f you Pelosi
Old news. So many people have known this. But where do these revelations get us? Nowhere. No one in this Administration has been touched, and I doubt they ever will be.
I'm waiting to see who is on the list for the presidential pardons in January. That could get mighty interesting.
As Frank Costanza would say, "Serenity Now!"
impeach them now...don't wait...
It's a shame that Bush couldn't have studied a little history before assuming office. Whatever happened to Teddy Roosevelt's admonition to :"Talk softly and carry a big stick". The modern Bush paradigm seems to be: "Don't talk except to lie and hit everything in sight."
So here's Rockefeller saying what anyone with half a brain already knew. The intelligent far preceded the intelligence in figuring the obvious out. So, the question is, Rockefeller.. why are you still trying to roll over on the retroactive telecom immunity issue? Why do ANY of these democrats give an inch to this bastard administration, knowing what they're capable of? It's revolting. Totally revolting. We need to be revolting.
Thank you, Keith Olbermann, for calling a lie a lie. It's amazing how many euphemisms the media can come up with to avoid using the word lie.
I know you're a smart guy, Keith, but seriously, "First unprovoked war in United States history"? Are there fumes in the studio at MSNBC, or is your producer just afraid to correct you?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_wars
impeach, convict then its off to the world court for war crimes and [Deleted-Sitemonitor]
sas @ 12:
fyi sas - applebee's doesn't have a salad bar.
Imagine my shock!
Let's get to the bottom of it all. No fear. Wherever the evidence leads go.
I did not need any politicians to tell me that the Bush Administrations were liars. I was against the invasion in Iraq for the real reason: We had given Saddam those weapons to fight the Iranian who had replaced an American favorite The Shah.
He was a bad leader, but he was ours and had to be retained at all cost. I have seen that Reagan contact Iran before the election to make sure that they would not deal with Jimmy Carter who was the president for re-election. Any one who remembered the 80’s, Reagan’s era has good time should have their head exam. They were the worst.
The joke in Europe was; where I grow up, that South America was changing leader every year! But I learned that if they did not play ball with our policies, their leaders would be eliminated. See the book about an Economic Hit Man. (Democracy Now)
I am for all participant of the Bush administration to be indicted for war crime against humanity.
I sure hope the populace won't be satisfied when the masters tell them what they already knew. Let's commit to dig deeper and bring about the real charges these a-holes are guilty of. It started with Election Fraud in 2000. Followed by fake terrorism and false flag events. Ultimately led to lying us into war. Don't be satisfied with half the story. By the way, in the meantime, our Constitutional rights have all been signed away. There given to us out of convenience, but they are no longer guaranteed us.
Still waiting for this story to appear on the Fox News or Drudge web sites.
The only shocking part of this report is that we had to wait until now to hear it in the Corporate Media.
After:
1.2 million Iraqi deaths & the complete destruction of their infrastructure;
4100 US military deaths, countless maimed, families pain;
trillions plundered from the US Treasury, domestic economy shredded;
illegal detentions, torture, kangaroo courts;
etc .. etc .. etc
Believe it or not, even at a snails pace, this begins to set the stage for impeachment. By establishing the series of offenses, including lying to congress, abuse of power, treason, etc. whether or not peloser has the nads, this process, snails pace and all, can lead to impeachment of every member of the WH involved and all complicit staff(Liibby?), Tenet, Powell, Rice, et al, and possibly members of the press who knowingly foisted these lies when there was no evidence for the stories they committed their enterprises to print and publish.
If no indictments for the press, then they should certainly be made to testify as to the lies they were told by the WH. I can see russert, judy miller, wolf blitzer and the rest at the mike, explaining to America why they LIED!
not stupid @ 48:
true. but by the constitution, the politicians are the ones to clean this up.
oh if they only would have called me I could have told them it was all a lie to have a war for profits. nationalism and patriotism and revenge can overwhelm the rational mind.
but Americans wanted to kick some butts Muslim butts any Muslim behind for 9/11.
now they pay the price for their desire for their Texas style shoot them first bully mentality but yet they blame their politicians rather than look into a mirror.
America the super power is about to get its ass kicked again like it did in Vietnam. if a country does not learn its lesson the first time karma brings the opportunity to learn right back to ya.
Americans did not ask for forgiveness for the one million Vietnamese they killed in that illegal war so they continue to suffer with treasure and deaths and inner chaos from this latest illegal war.
but hey life is easy kind of if you live in denial. wake up Americans you need to change more than just your politicians.
once you Americans understand that you are a country of wars for profits maybe just maybe you will move beyond blame and accept responsibility for your war mongering and the tremendous suffering you have caused in the world.
it will happen like it did in germany and japan karma demands it.
Matt in Texas @ 9:
OK, it's a little hard to know exactly what Bush would have to do in order to get impeached. If this doesn't rise to the level of an impeachable offense, does that mean the only way to get impeached is to lie about a blow job? Seriously folks, what kind of message is sent by the fact that Clinton underwent impeachment hearings and Bush has not faced any serious hearings at all? This situation is a complete miscarriage of justice, a complete abrogation of the responsibility of Congress, an intolerable shame to all Americans, a statement of the lack of any ethical foundation or legitimacy for the actions of the nation.
I think it's time to oust 'em all. The '06 lot of democrats for the most part are all horseshit pussies.
Nancy and Harry are worthless! Screw holding their feet to the fire, I say grab em by the ankle and toss em into the fire!
Impaeach em all and hold them accountable down to the last fucking enabler!
Maybe it's time for the electorate to raise some hell and purge these fuckers in order to send a message to the future leaders.
You were elected to serve the public and defend the constitution. Now do your fucking job.
IMPEACH!!!
To the poster directly above me....I have thought about this often. I can't help but wonder if the whole "impeach Bill" wasn't just an attemp to trivialize and "dirty up" the impeachment process. This made the general populace very hesitant to call for impeachmentit and congress scared shitless to implement it. After all, certainly they already knew the dirt on Bill, they began investigating him the moment he entered the race if not before. So, maybe they knew there was nothing there, but they weakened impeachment as a process. Maybe THAT was the real goal.
OK tinfoil hat off, maybe.......
tr @ 24:
It does look that way. If your wife or daughter or son or mother, was killed by "shock and awe" how would you feel? But it's nothing personal. They just want your oil.
Let the War Crimes Tribunals commence!
John @ 11:
Extremely well said. I would also add that what Congress and the Democrats have also ignored are the Downing Street Minutes, which revealed that the U.S. was hell bent on going to war against Iraq in the summer of 2002. That alone should have been grounds for impeachment but still Congress and the Democrats failed to act. It is now wonder that people, turned off by the ineptness of the Democrats, are turning to a third party in 2008.
Let's all vote for McBush!!! Yeah right!!! Every day he makes a screw-up!!!
I wish we could impeach them all. But it is up the all of us to get rit of all old repugs in congress, to tell them that they will not again be able to get new law made by the Pharma, energy CO!
Lets get all republicans out
We've known about this for 5+ years now and no one does anything about it.
Bush sucks; he has nothing but contempt for Congress; his Administration is filled with liars and criminals; they lied about the war; they fired judges for political reasons; they deliberately leaked Valerie Plames name; the list goes on and on and on..............and I ask; so what? No one is going to do anything about it, except maybe pound on a desk and point their finger.
We just have to put up with him for 6 more months, and we can then send him off to Crawford and close the book on this sad chapter of our history.
If there is a bright side, we can use his Administration as the excuse for anything that goes wrong over the next 10 years!
calgarylady @ 30:
Which is probably one of the real reasons Pelosi uttered her famous words about taking impeachment off the table. Keep Bush in office and then begin to pull all of this out as we get closer to the 2008 elections. All of this will pile up and it will be hard for all except the most fervent 25%'ers to ignore.
I disagree with Ms. Pelosi though because the only way this country can begin to function again is if these criminals are either impeached or put to trial. There is no way they can get away with all they've done and just walk away with all the loot. Hell there are people sitting in jail that have done just 1% of what these people have done and Bush and his gang just walk away with only a tarnished legacy? Hundreds of millions of dollars and just a tarnished legacy, if it weren't for the millions dead I'd say sign me up but then again I have a consious and at least one honest bone in my body.
With all that is now confirmed (we all knew it before, confirmed is another thing altogether) impeachment isn't enough. A lot of people need to go to prison and for a very long time.
One last thing, it's time we stop saying that BushCo didn't tell the truth especially you Senator Rockefeller. Bush LIED and it needs to be said. LIED gives a much stronger jolt to the brain and if we begin to use we might actually begin to get through to people. The president of this country LIED to take us to war. A war that has cost up billions of dollars, over 4000 military lives, 10's of thousand military members who are physically and mentally crippled, and millions of Iraqi's dead and misplaced. This country has committed genocide on a country over LIES told by its president and senior government officials.
Yes, George Bush is a LIER and it needs to be said loudly and repeated as often as necessary until everyone understands it. It needs to be repeated and it needs to be linked as often as possible to John McCain so he can quietly in to the night with nary a whimper.
I can't be positive, but I seem to remember the opening backdrop to the News Hour still stating McNeil/Lehrer up until very recently. I'd always thought it was a class A move by Jim Lehrer to keep it. Also, unless I'm mistaken, I think the News Hour is still produced by a McNeil/Lehrer joint production company.
[The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer-Sitemonitor]
lipstickhottie @ 57:
You know I used to rarely put any stock in conspiracy theories until this gang came to power. After what they've pulled I put nothing past them either in the past, the present, or the future. I won't be one bit surprised if they attack Iran or create some kind of problem that they have to inact martial law and suspend the elections. If you would say I would think this even just a year ago I would have said you were crazy but not anymore.
I don't trust any of them as far as I could throw them so pass me a tinfoil hat as well. It's going to be a long 6 months until they're hopefully gone.
fiver @ 65:
Thanx. It confirms the joint production company (no ysbadadden, that isn't what they produce), but the backdrop is still bugging me. I'll look some more.
Someone usually comes along right about now to remind us of this:
The House of Representatives votes to impeach, and the Senate holds the trial. Conviction requires a 2/3 majority, which the Dems don't have. Imagine the fun we'd have if we actually got around to the discovery phase, and the Senate called witnesses, and all manner of lies and indiscretions came to light. Everything--the stolen elections, the media complicity, the no-bid contracts--it was all exposed on C-Span, and the nightly news. "Good God!" we'd scream, "These people are criminals!"
Then they'd vote, and fall short of the 2/3 majority. And the media would say "They must be innocent, if they were found not guilty..."
I say it's much more effective (for the time being) to vote the scoundrels out. We'll get it sorted out eventually, and maybe we'll even see Bush stand trial at the Hague.
Tommy Hussein @ 68:
Not to mention there's no way in hell they'd get this done before Chimpy leaves office anyway.
Tommy Hussein @ 68:
Tommy,
We could have been conducting hearings for over a year now. The Republicans are running scared. The Senate picture could look very different now if the Bush criminals hadn't been protected by their Democratic collaborators. Judging from your phrasing (and you're right, it was about time someone mentioned this), I think we agree.
Where I disagree is that "voting them out and then worrying about it later" is a workable solution. I've predicted blanket pardons on Bushes way out, and they seem ever more likely. Of course, all the pardons will be given in the name freedom and protecting the "patriots" from frivolous litigation.
First unprovoked war? After what we now know about vietnam and ww1? common keith, you're losing it man.
yes...we could have been conducting hearings. We could have begun in Jan. '07. But we'd never have gotten a 2/3 majority, and still won't. It's quite likely that Bush and his cronies will never stand trial--in America.
But it's not out of the realm of possibility that we'd turn on the nightly news someday to see Bush de-plane in a foreign country, only to be surrounded by the local militia, and carted off to prison.
And it would be our turn to say "so?"
eyepennies @ 29:
I stand corrected thank you
Tommy Hussein @ 72:
So, in that case, does the Secret Service turn into an honor guard? Do they surround Bush as he breaks big rocks into little rocks for fifteen years? Well, we can hope.
I never thought I'd even think that of a U.S. president. We've fallen very far.
Indeed we have.
Pelosi needs to be impeached so Americans can get on with making justice on the war criminals.
Republicans were able to impeach Clinton with 33% of the country's approval. More than 50% of Americans have wanted to see Bush impeached for quite a while now.
Are the Dems completely impotent? Well, yeah!
I don't wonder how Republicans reconcile Bush lying about the case for war with Iraq. It's easy since they won't believe he lied no matter what evidence is reported to the contrary. If they don't hear it from Rush or Sean, it's just a lie to make George Bush look bad.
Oh, and that thing about Bush being born again makes it impossible for the simps to believe he could ever lie.
Ruthless People @ 14:
Like his 'private time' with Jeff Gannon wasn't enough?
The Republicans were able to impeach Clinton in the House of Representatives because they had the votes, regardless of the public opinion polls. They fell short of convicting in the Senate, because they didn't have the votes--barely.
The Republicans would never vote to convict Bush of anything, ever. Impeachment would ultimately fail, and then we'd be really pissed and indignant. Yes, even more so than we are now.
Bush will get his due. Karma is a bitch, and revenge is a dish that's best served cold...
karl @ 17:
My instincts tell me there will be no accountability. Whatever the reasons--threats, blackmail, deals, double deals, who knows. Pelosi's stand is the clue. This country is doomed.
Ruthless People @ 14:
Would that be Oral Roberts job ??
Tommy Hussein @ 79:
Bush has never received his due. From academic failure at Yale then Harvard, to Arbusto, to the Texas Rangers, to the Governor of Texas, to the Presidency, Bush's life has been one prestigious appointment after another, failing miserably at each one.
Karma may be a bitch, but it may also be a myth. Revenge is certainly best served cold, but I want justice - and justice delayed is justice denied.
If only it was a benign insanity being displayed for the Republicans, I'd feel much safer. But their insanity is a malignant insanity that has gotten over 4,000 of our soldiers killed over in Iraq as well as severely injuring anywhere from 25,000 to 50,000 of our soldiers (I personally believe this figure is much higher). And these casualty numbers don't even count the hundreds of thousands of our loyal and dedicated soldiers who have suffered severe mental distress due to their war experiences in Iraq. Nor do these figures include the dead and injured Iraqis, which some estimate to be well over 1 million while my own estimate is that Bush's unprovoked, unnecessary attack on Iraq has generated 2 to 3 million dead or injured Iraqis, along with 5 million Iraqis being displaced, about half inside Iraq with the other half fleeing Iraq entirely.
And rubber-stamp Republicans like Roberts keep defending the malignant insanity of the Bush administration, going so far as to try to hide how lying, deceitful and insane the Bush administration really is.
And then there are the malignantly insane Republicans on the intelligence committee who refute the findings of the full committee that the Bush administration intentionally lied us into a war in Iraq...which actually begs the question: why are some Republicans with so little intelligence and so meager morality doing on an intelligence committee in the first place? Ship them all to GITMO for their war crimes.
By waiting until election season, the Dems have opened themselves up to accusations of election year posturing. Why wasn't this done immediately after the 2006 elections? We know why -- because they see this as a way to damage the Republican party, rather than fact-finding.
BushCo belongs behind bars -- yet Rockefeller said he was not supporting criminal investigations. Why? Oh, because there is too much else to do in the Senate, and such an investigation would take up too much of their schedule. SO F'N WHAT?! 4000 of our finest young men and women are dead. Perhaps as many as a million Iraqis are dead. If Bush is criminally culpable, then who the hell cares about other legislative business? This is far more important than ANYTHING else they have on their slate.
Tommy Hussein @ 68:
Remember when Bush was petitioning all sorts of countries to provide immunity from war crimes prosecutions? Do you know how many of them agreed to it?
I happen to be an atheist, but I wish there were a God out there somewhere who would send Bush and his criminal gang straight to hell where they belong.
Casus B-Lie...
mystic @ 80: